>>33908792 (OP)
In a pursuit, the pursued is generally at a disadvantage, and that's without the specificity of this situation and the additional advantages cops have. From a disadvantaged position, you win by exploiting the opponents weaknesses or nullifying their advantages, ideally by exploiting them as weaknesses.
>I imagine the key is to get out of their sprinting distance after which they are automatically at disadvantage since they wear boots and carry heavy equipment.
In a foot pursuit, you are up against someone who trains for and has experience in this situation. You are not and do not. You are physically disadvantaged.
>Then you can just jog in a zigzag until they don't see you
You zigzag when you're being shot at. A pursuer will not zig or zag like you, they will concentrate on running in a straight path that follows your mean path in order to close the distance.
By being particularly fast, agile, clever and lucky you might get away from a cop or two on the first leg, but that's just going to piss them off in most cases, they are generally highly competitive and don't like to lose. Then they bring in more advantages, numberical and cooperational. They can be in many places at once, coordinating their actions. You cannot. They also have time on their side. They can wait you out all day, all night, for months or years, and they get paid pretty well to do it. You don't have those luxuries. Your only real advantage is potentially being smarter than the collective intelligence of a bunch of midwits with operational experience. I don't think you are, but
>take off a layer of clothes and get into public transport or some building with multiple exits.
This could work, if you get out of sight, which is hard to be sure of. Not matching the description they're broadcasting is a good strategy. Blending in to a large crowd can work, or as a "scenery person" doing a job.