>>941967047 (OP)
that's really cool, but it's kinda disturbing to consider in the next few years you won't be able to trust anything
you could argue you already can't, or that you never could, but the fact of the matter is someone could fabricate convincing "evidence" of anything with this tech, even crimes someone never committed
i wonder how long this technology has existed in secret, and if it was used in the past 50 years to simulate events we think were real
