>>76483824holy shit
another badly made dietary study that controls for almost no confounders and shows only useless correlation??
no way! i'm blown away!
you know what has a "super high" Glycemic Index of 100 (by definition even) and actually CAUSES a bunch of health issues?
>refined sugarcurious
they didn't even bother to control for the most basic stuff like BMI / BF or physical activity
my point still stands
>high glycemic diet causes exactly nothing in healthy adultswell I admit this addition, which I though was self-evident
>IF you (mostly) avoid refined sugar and the worst uhp goyslop