>>105630145 (OP)
>What are some browsers that are better than Chrome?
Not the one in OP's pic, that's for damn sure.
Its vaunted privacy paradigm, while ostensibly laudable, falters under scrutiny. The browser’s ad-blocking machinations, designed to thwart intrusive trackers, oft disrupt legitimate web functionalities, such as analytics APIs or hardware concurrency protocols, rendering certain applications inoperable. Users lament this overzealous sanitization as a pyrrhic victory for privacy, sacrificing utility. Moreover, Brave’s integration of a cryptocurrency ecosystem, dubbed BAT, is an unwieldy appendage. This pecuniary contrivance, meant to incentivize ad viewing, burdens the interface with superfluous widgets, bloating what should be a svelte browsing experience. Critics decry this as a descent into bloatware, a betrayal of its minimalist ethos. Performance, too, invites opprobrium. Recent user reports bewail sluggish page-loading times, a stark contrast to competitors like Chrome or Edge, which dispatch content with alacrity. On mobile, Brave’s propensity to overheat devices and deplete batteries exacerbates its infamy. Lastly, its customization paucity and lackluster iOS integration alienate users seeking seamless synchronicity. While Brave aspires to be a bastion of privacy, its execution, marred by functional overreach and technical lethargy, renders it a suboptimal choice for the discerning netizen.
