>>105694889
yeah
just give it more bits
and nothing says you couldnt have a an architecture which accepts arbitrary length adresses
in the you then keep the number in your code in an extensible object and feed it to the cpu piecemeal, whats the problem with that?
>inb4 but what if its an infinite ram, ahah!
infinte ram has room for an infinitely long number, no?
AND an infinite amount of data, thats kinda the deal with infinity, no?