>>105689186 (OP)This is actually an issue in the Linux community and has been documented several times.
So far there have been 2 studies that gather IQ and software preference in universities, and, to the surprise of anyone, Linux users are noticeably "smarter" (IQ not necessarily mean someone is smarter, as several things influence the ability to rationalise) than Mac users and Windows users (one of the tests includes both Android and iOS in the results because apparently, nowadays people don't own computers anymore).
The issue is. Everyone working on Linux and using it is so far off the curve that people with disabilities (IQ was literally created to measure mental retardation) just can't figure out the same thought process that the guys who made it had.
Women, children and ethnic groups with lower IQs struggle a lot with Linux, and it's not the developers fault. Google spends a ridiculous amount of money making their OS "retard proof" to the point where toddlers and even chimps learn how to use tablets.
Answering OP's question.
The only way to make Linux easy for children, women and some minorities is by including them in the testing groups, like Google did.
Meanwhile we will need to contend with "people" posting about how GNOME is hard to use...