Thread 105747916

>"we made this with ai!"
>look inside
>complete dogshit

>>105747932
>>complete dogshit
its good enough to get 400k monthly listeners.
and regardless, its only going to continue improving at an exponential rate

>>105747916 (OP)
Who are you mocking? I have never seen this sentiment from artists.
Hey, you're a mediocre person making this website more mediocre. Mind closing the tab?

>>105747983
>I have never seen this sentiment from artists.
that's a good joke anon

>>105747916 (OP)
95% of normie music is using the same chord progression along with some family friendly lyrics about love or difficulties, this is completely expected

>>105747916 (OP)
Streaming bots

>>105748130
No, you don't understand, le lyrics are soo deep, about him standing there, rejected in the rain. So original.

>>105748090
I guess because I'm not obsessively reading through every xitter manifesto I can find I'm not very familiar with hot button topics such as this. being a programmer must be really tough when the whole world's against you, and the misgendering just won't stop.

>>105748175
if OP is wrong and artists are doing so great then why are you triggered into defending them? they are doing just fine as you said right?

>>105748199
>artists are doing so great
I'm implying the very opposite, abusive narcissist. I've consistently only ever seen artists complain about AI, but the OP in her post is implying that artists have been celebrating their irreplaceability all this time. It's valid to feel that way, but I also have a right to express my feelings.

>>105747916 (OP)
first AI band: 411k listeners
second AI band: 13 listeners
third AI band: 0 listeners

>>105747916 (OP)
>411k
>cultural velocity
Literally who

>>105748245
>I have a right to ad hominem
fuck off cunt

>>105747977
you're talking to people who are ideologically opposed

>>105747916 (OP)
Do you make money doing that?

>>105747916 (OP)
>bot producers
>bot listeners

The whole scheme will eventually collapse into exporting subsidised electricity.

>>105747916 (OP)
desu that track sounds pretty good and not that different from what something like tame impala puts out mixwise. everything is megaprocessed these days anyways. you can only really spot the ai in some of the vocal phrasing which are bit unnatural

>>105747977
>an entire python script's worth of monthly listens
wholly moley!!!

>>105747977
>>and regardless, its only going to continue improving at an exponential rate
I've been hearing this spiel for 3 years now, especially from /g/ faggots spamming on that already cancerous /ic/ shitshow

>>105747983
>I have never seen this sentiment from artists.

>>105748793

>>105747977
>its good enough to get 400k monthly listeners.

I do not use this app, so I cant say for sure but just like 400k views on X can mean nothing(only the interactions matter), I would only count those who are not bots and added the song to their most used playlists, because there are too many investors getting impatient with AI and too many people willing to cheat to save their asses.

>>105747977
>artist name and song title are obvious autocomplete traps
>this strategy will scale forever bro

>>105748294
I was adding a comedic flair, and if you read my comment you'll see that it was in no way an ad hominem. Ad hominem is a fallacy, it doesn't mean just adding "stupid" to the end of your sentence. Back to phil101, boy.

>>105748869
Where is it made apparent that he is an artist, and that he believes that art is immune to AI?

>>105747916 (OP)
I'm not convinced that the views/listens/etc on AI slop are genuine people. Probably mostly bots.

>411k listeners
That's like 25 cents. Why are Indians so obsessed with fabricating an AI takeover? It's really repulsive, like everything about Indians.

>>105747916 (OP)
>yeah bro AI will take over our boring, pointless jobs so we can focus on our hobbies, self-improvement, pursue arts etc
>in reality it's the complete opposite
You VILL live in the pod, goy boy. AI will create your culture and entertainment while you slave away in a shoe box, so the gdp chart keeps going up.

>>105751437
The guy you're replying to has some unhealthy grudge against artists. Everything he does revolves around trying to spite them in the pettiest way possible.

>>105747916 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQJ9IWoclhk
Lol it sounds pretty close to real, that's scary

i remember a while back some pr agency planted a bunch of stories about how much their ai influencer was making and it was clearly fake and a promotion for an onlyfans alternative.
i remember a midwit friend of mine going like
>bro we should do this we'd make so much money
this sounds like that

there are already a lot of people who do the following:
1. get popular song
2. stem separate vocals
3. pitch them slightly
4. throw them into suno or audio to generate a 'remix'
5. upload it to spotify
this was from a few months ago

>>105747916 (OP)
They stole that name from one of my favourite songs
https://soundcloud.com/adustam/velvet-sundown

>>105747916 (OP)
>haha AI will take your art job. us coders we are safe, we never have to worry abou-ACK!
haha

>>105752201
Most people are too lazy to exploit the obvious money printing machines. There are AI prompters on patreon, taking money for AI prompts, and they're open about it. They make as much money as artists. Why aren't me and you doing it? Cause we're lazy retards, no other reason

>>105747916 (OP)
spotify make AI tunes so they can put those songs in playlist and dilute the number of songs which sends royalties outside of spotify.
spotify is going to be 30% AI music made by spotify in order to keep giving away money.
this is their stated aim. it is no great secret, just journos don't talk about it because they want to be invited to the next spotify party.

>>105752590
when fleshes are replaced by AI, spotify business model will finally makes sense. it would work much better for curating AI music

>>105747916 (OP)
>>105747977
>>105748262
400k on spotify is nothing, I can tell you aren't even using the platform

>>105747916 (OP)
You may not like the expression "AI slop" but it is the most appropriate one that exists to describe the phenomenon we're currently experiencing

>>105747916 (OP)
>the velvet underground
>dust in the wind

>>105748534
and in that 3 years it has progressed at an insanely fast rate. quit being a retard

>>105752627
400k on spotify is actually really good, especially for something thats only been up a few weeks

I don't care if people like listening to the slop. I'm not going to listen to the slop.

>>105747983
i've never seen a post more nakedly, more obviously soaking in seethe or maybe even rage, like a wild dog that's about to snap.

>>105752627
Post your account that has 500k then

>>105754759
What if so many people listen to the slop that they stop making non-slop songs for you to listen to?

>>105747916 (OP)
It's the usual problem: The majority decides what works and what doesn't.
The majority is normies.
This is why everything gets worse.

>>105747916 (OP)
I think it's funnier that this AI band's """"""success""""" is just as synthetic

>>105755165
The majority in the 2020s is bots and fake numbers though.

>>105755180
Mostly because those things influence the normies and what the recommendation algorithms present them.

>>105747932
>>105747977
look at any top 10 song list
it's all abhorrent dogshit
if anything AI slop will be an improvement

>>105747977
To be fair, genuinely horrendous, brain wrecking, thought stopping stuff has hundreds of thousands of views all over social media these days and it's all AI made.

>>105754745
sure, exponential rate right? I've been hearing how I'd be out of a job in the next two months for three years now.
I haven't seen this so called exponential rate of improvement in image generation in the last three years.

Why are AI fags so adamant about rooting out human creativity and passion

>>105757518
look at the first AI videos of will smith eating spaghetti from like a year or so ago and compare them to AI videos generated today.
anyone who downplays AI advancement is nothing more than a midwit that lacks the ability of foresight

>>105757607
>from like a year or so ago
>2022 was a year ago
anon I have devastating news for you...

>>105747916 (OP)
you shouldn't be listening to music unless its performed live. as AI eats the revenue, we'll have less grifters

>>105757662
regardless, the level of advancement in the short amount of time is insane and its only going to continue getting better

>>105747916 (OP)
Shame all those listeners are also AI...

>>105747977
>Look guys, a whole new AI band!
>Go listen to their song
>+1 monthly listener
>Do this 400K times indirectly by making shit threads such as this one
>Wow guys! 400K listeners, entirely organically too!
Wait a month and see if this artificial hype remains. I guarantee it doesn't.

>>105747916 (OP)
>Dust on the wind
>Rebel shout
Wow, how legally distinct this AI band is.

>>105757607
>>105758265
>and its only going to continue getting better
I never said there wasn't a jump or that it will not get better, I'm saying that it's not exponential, at least not in immediate short term as a lot of people have been saying for the last three years, that's why I cited image generation, which definitely didn't have the exponential jump it had before 2021/2022 in the subsequent three years of amazing leaps forward just around the corner.
The fact that now video generation reached a similar level to image generation and music generation doesn't necessarily mean that in a year you'll have perfect video generation cause there was a leap before.
Similar to when we went to the moon in the 60s and a lot of people believed we'd have androids, extra planetary colonies and flying cars by the 2000s

>>105759278
the second exponential doesn't make much sense there, please ignore it

>>105747983
Yea youre seething

>>105747977
Yes, and dumping your garbage in the river is ‘good enough’ to get it out of the way. This is the difference between pajeets and people who would like an Internet actually worth using.

>>105747916 (OP)
>>105747977
Something tells me the 400k listeners are not entirely organic.