How to request advice:
>Budget>Intended use (media, source, environment)>Frequency response preference and music examples>Past gear and your thoughts on themFAQ:
>Where do I buy IEMs?Amazon, Aliexpress, Linsoul, Hifigo, Shenzhenaudio
>Shopping Guide (IEMs, PMPs, Cables, Ear Tips, etc.):https://rentry.org/consoomer_guide
>EQ Guide (EQ 101, Targets, Myths & Misconceptions, Case Studies, etc.):https://4ciemg.github.io/IEM-EQ-Guide/
>/iemg/'s Blog/Wiki (Archieve, Books & Papers, Music Editorial, etc.):https://4ciemg.github.io/IEMGazette/
>Frequency Response Graph Toolsquig.link
>Budget Wire Over-Ear IEMs:โข Tripowin Ruta10 (Mild V) - $18
โข Tanchjim Bunny (Mild U) - $20
โข Truthear Gate (Mild V) - $22
โข Kiwi Ears Cadenza (Mild V) - $35
>Bullet IEMs:โข Tanchjim ONE DSP (5 Presets/5-Band PEQ) - $28
โข Etymotic ER2XR (Neutral) - $140
>Flathead Earbuds:โข Blue Vido (Warm) - $5
โข Yincrow X6 (Warm) - $10
>USB-C DACs:โข JCally JM6 (Non Pro) - $8
โข JCally JM20 Pro (8-Band PEQ) - $24
โข Tanchjim Stargate II (8-Band PEQ) - $38
โข Qudelix 5K (20-Band PEQ/GEQ) - $110
>PMPs:โข HiBy R1 - $85
โข HiBy M300 - $200
>AVOID USING:โข Mainboard audio when using multi-driver pos
Previous Thread:
>>105876675
why not put kbear kb01 instead of cadenza
>>105893064cadenza is more widely distributed and the better known quantity. if anything can just put both tho
techs
md5: b6165b7eb4e13bc065e42ef1f5fc4cff
๐
you can see that the techs are not good on this one
>>105893585Do you mind waiting until tomorrow before posting more? We don't work on weekends...
>>105893585Why did you buy that pos...
>>105892944>if by techs you mean FR then yesdipshit
>>105893585>needs to strip completely to sell xer pos
>>105893703Square wave is just FR at a dozen of points. And if it actually resembles a square it means there's just one driver(abysmal techs).
What a proper techy square wave looks like. Mathematically proven.
>look at that square wave showing the same thing as FR but in a linear scale. checkmate deafzos!
techs are stored in the balls
tr
md5: 2a5e97f078de7d94b78b0a735d554539
๐
>Azla new ultra low cost iem, the Trinity featuring Azla's ARD driver and aluminum housing, price is 2200 yen or 15$
bulletzos we are so back
jap
md5: e99e4d147da5976b874466ddcf5bd964
๐
>DITA Prelude $160 1DD jap-fi techs
>full metal pos
eww
>>105894102what's this? a pos for little school girls?
>>105893585Is the warped effect supposed to signify insane soundstage?
>>105894152they are so behind...
>>105893585why is she naked?
>>105893585holy fuck didn't know asano was that stacked, fat ass mommy milkers on that transqueen
I'm gonna start a pos company and put half naked irl bitches on the boxes. tuning wont be v-shaped for vaginas, but v-shaped. a mound on the right for the right tit, the dip in the middle because no tit there and the right hump for the treble. will call it JPAL-1 for japan phat ass ladies. or something.
>>105894714pre-order link where?
>280 dollars for a 2DD hybrid
Our QVEEN would sell it for under 100.
>>105894742Nigga you have like 4 sub-100 2DDs already.
r00d
md5: 36e92a12b718521198c3f8e57ccbe1d8
๐
>>105894742stfu bunny whore!
>>105894742bring back the hola you retarded cunt
TECHS
md5: 3d03176598155cb309708e61b12725a3
๐
>>105894742truthear has no feet techs
>>105894735have you completed the sacred burn-in rituals?
>>105894102>hi-quality dynamic driverheh
>>105894605she was FORCEd to
>>105894839yes, also burned in your mother with my dick
>>105895226we take fr seriously here. you gotta lock yourself in a room with no windows or lights for 72 hours straight playing pink noise at exactly 72.8dB.
then you gotta recite crinacle's top 10 list backwards while holding an ea500lm in one hand and zsn pro x graph in the other.
finally, you must sacrifice your foam tips to the altar of soundstage.
no exceptions
What's the best TWS earhook available right now?
uhoh
md5: abf3dbc9e90b135cc5028837a7d224d1
๐
>>105896340My cats can't grab the wires inside the earhooks when they sit on my lap, they can grab the wires leading to my IEMs.
>>105896347UTWS5 2025 is your only option
TimeEar Blossoms should replace G10 as the new 35$ rec and im not even joking
>>105896772The entire point of g10 is that it's comfortable as fuck. This is ass.
They are right, Q1P is better than EDC Pro which is better than Origin.
Bunny? To be determined.
>retard 1 shows a single unit with a slight imbalance
>retard 2 goes full ape and removes it from OP
why is this general like that
>>1058967720 squigs to be seen so it's not a safe pick compared to G10. If schizos here are going to try to shit on G10/Q1 Pro, at least pull up an iem that's more appealing.
>>105896823>small imbalanceI shiggy diggy
>>105896772I'm not against an IEM with Q1pro tier shell and better tuning but this ain't it
>>105896833>no one buys new iems cause no one graphed them>no graphs cause no one bought themSound logic working in favor of the shills here
>>105896845it is a small imbalance tho
qc
md5: 5d2fef64696d6ec6da6748ecd1cc360e
๐
>>105896845>within QC tolerance bandswow...
>>105896845Way better than origin.
>>105896878Bro having a melty with tanchjim all the time lol
>>105896888Why did you buy that imbalanced pos, bro.
>>105896900Asano loves you, yet your self hatred wont let you see how wide and immersive her love is
>people extolling Q1pro comfort
Really? Seems pretty average to me. Also look what I did to my gate cables, super spammer isn't going to like this one.
I think it's time to admit that ALL chink IEM makers have shit QC and it's basically random if you get a unit with good channel matching or not.
And you will never know if you don't have a measuring device because all of you dumb fucks are fucking deaf.
Discussing this beyond that is silly.
>>105896927Nah tanchjim would win the QC game
>>105896916everybody's ears are different. Some people like how edc pro fits. I can't even make them stay properly inside my ears lol
>>105896833Replace g10 with g20.
>>105896940we simply do not have data to confirm or deny that
even if we take ALL of squigs... it's still not enough data points
I have a Variations but I'm afraid it's wasted on me because I skipped over everything between $15 and $500 so I don't have much of a point of reference
>>105896963Variations were obsoleted by fox iem, sorry.
>>105896867If this is how the hobby worked then there wouldn't be the hype culture we have for new iems. There exists no squigs for Blossoms because nobody cares. Simple as
>>105896916At worst, it's average in terms of comfort.
At best, it's as good as it gets.
>>105896927It's the opposite, most have decent to great channel matching (QC not so much). Unit variation take is based and the rest is true except that since most are deaf they will not notice <1db imbalance.
>>105896953No.
>>105896957Good take, and I would argue that most data points are bad.
>>105896963You need to either have a good speaker setup, music production experience, or read the EQ guide.
>>105896963>I have a VariationsMy condolences bro
>>105896963moon...DROPPED!
If you have no rig you have imbalance. If you have a rig but can't EQ per channel you still have imbalance. Until proven otherwise.
>>105897002Who named you the sheriff?
fun fact: your ear anatomy is probably asymmetrical, and so you will have a difference in length mode frequency, but also amplitude across the whole range
https://4ciemg.github.io/IEMGazette/monthly-issues/may-2025/#insertion-depth-change-explanation
>the dude with his 30$ set feeling like he is hot shit for using an equalizer
My sides
So is there even one good technical explanation why EQ isn't the most efficient, accessible, and powerful tool to change how something sounds?
>>105896983>Good take, and I would argue that most data points are bad.711 couplers are fine for channel matching data. We don't need to compare actual FR. Just channel matching measured with the same coupler.
It is much easier but yeah there's no real control or methodology with a lot of them but it'll just lower the number of data points available. (some of them are measurements of the same IEM reviewers are sending to each other lol)
>>105897019>he thinks there are IEMs that don't need EQ
>>105897015I don't really hear peak imbalance on any of my IEMs.
>>105897071>I don't really hearMany such cases.
>>105897019you are in a wrong thread to push dumb bullshit like that
this whole hobby emerged because $30 IEMs became as good as $300+ shit
>anons that post pics and measurements are mega chill
>retards that don't post anything shitting up the thread with senseless debating in at the schizo round table
why???
>>105897076are you stupid? I CAN hear it by changing insertion depth lol My peak is super fucking loud and it's unmistakable when tone is playing in the middle or to the one side or the other...
Force
md5: 880d5e860eb281e79cbf3e3a751aa1f5
๐
Force graphs. No real opinions on sound yet, they seem alright but I'm not immediately noticing the claims of huge soundstage. I don't know what the point of the Effect Audio collab was, the cable is nothing special apart from Tanchjim's modular plug system which is the best out there.
RE: Channel matching, I'll let the shitposters decide on the final verdict. I can hear it but I can't quite decide if it bothers me just yet.
>>105897128Channel matching is above average, really good by my books.
>but I'm not immediately noticing the claims of huge soundstageAny extraordinary claim of soundstage is false, and if you learn how localization works in both production and reproduction of music then you will know how to perceive it and communicate your experience better.
>>105897128How's the subbass distortion. Truthear zero had a rolloff like that and it sucked.
>>105897143>Any extraordinary claim of soundstage is false, and if you learn how localization works in both production and reproduction of music then you will know how to perceive it and communicate your experience better.Soundstage for pos is just your brain playing tricks on you, and these pos don't trick my brain the same way pos with less isolation does. Other people might not have the same experience.
>>105897152I don't listen loud enough for that to remotely matter.
>>105897128how thick is it compared to origin and kara
>>105897128>I'm not immediately noticing the claims of huge soundstageRussian propaganda.
it's called psychoacoustics you swine
>>105897261It's called stop buying used IEMs, pagpag.
>>105897261you literally don't know anything about psychoacoustics
>>105897181Way bigger but I like the comfort more.
I actually got a postcard for the first time ever, it's nice.
>>105897321>it's called a hamburger>you don't know shit about hamburgersthat's you. that's what you sound like. fuck you
>>105897323wtf it's fucking HUUGE
>>105897361this is amusing because
>psychoacustics = hamburger is the level of your understanding of the matter
>>105897377it's called an analogy you lil skamp
>>105897399what the fuck else would I goon to? people?
>>105897388it's a dogshit analogy because you open you mouth about psychoacoustic without any understanding about what the fuck you are saying and why
>>105897323never been so over, that is massive for a tanchjim pos
does anyone know if they are releasing any other completely new iem (so no lost manor)? if not then i'm redeeming the fission next
also
tribute when?
psychoacoustic don't really say anything about why one IEM would have a better soundstage over the other in the first place because it's all very vague individualistic and hard to research
>>105897128paying $200 for 2DD to get a weirdo subbass roll off and 1DD tier treble? yeeeeeah I don't think so
>>105897547>it's all very vague individualistic and hard to researchNot really if you are up to date with current research on localization. In the grand scheme of things we are decently close to audio personalization for external localization.
>>105897563>Not really if you are up to date with current research on localizationresearch on localization is irrelevant to IEMs... feel free to link the research tho
>In the grand scheme of things we are decently close to audio personalization for external localizationwell fucking show me a soundstage on the graph then
>>105897581Oh I wasn't talking about passive IEMs, I was just discussing about the topic in general.
I think the closest we'll get to the optimization of soundstage is with isolation/openness and FR.
Most of the research nowadays is based on VR anyways.
>>105897560DDs are the best at treble, sounds good to me.
>>105897605why the fuck are you talking about irrelevant shit then?
The fact of the matter is some people hear what they would describe as a "soundstage" with some IEMs but not the others and nobody really knows why.
There are some assumptions but IEMs just do not have ANY of localization queues our brains use.
There are two classes in /iemg/.
Subhuman genetic freaks, and Superior Pioneers of Sonics with perfect HRTF matching with 1DD IEMs.
Which one are you?
>>105897677>There are two classes in /iemg/.nope, just one: man-children who blow way too much money up chink's asses
>>105897658asking almost $300 for basically $30 tuning is insane
>DDs are the best at treble, sounds good to me.do you not hear 14k peak?
>>105897128>I'm not immediately noticing the claims of huge soundstagechannels are too closely matched for a good soundstage
>>105897785I get peaks all over the place with every driver type, pretending like DDs are the only drivers that have peaks is retarded.
as per usual, the real lessons is to read the eq guide
>>105897532you keep saying I don't know shit about it so confidently. again, fuck you.
entry level IEMs?
i don't want to bring my big boy cans to work. but i don't actually know if i'd like IEMs. if they suck i don't want to be out hundreds of dollars, but if they suck just because i got cheap ones i'm missing out. where's the sweet spot? what would you recommend if your friend asked you? (i am your friend)
>>105897785>asking almost $300 for basically $30 tuning is insaneYou don't get it, you pay $300 for atrocious shells.
>>105897813read the eq guide, realize that price doesn't matter, that every iem will work, that you're using them at work so get some airpods pro 2
>>105897823>airpods pro 2i don't use apple. i don't want my electronics to be made by slaves.
>>105897833then get whatever is in the op, or buy some other anc tws
>>105897581you can't graph it, but I'm sure diagrams could be drawn to illustrate how you perceive where different sounds "placed" in your head. 99.999% of all reviews mention soundstage. you're a dolt
>>105897804because it's obvious that you don't
don't ever say "psychoacoustics" ever again if you don't have anything substantial to add, kid
uuh achtually it's psychoacoustics
no actually you are retarded
>>105897833>i don't want my electronics to be made by slaves.Who do you think makes IEMs sold for $3 with global shipping and somehow still making profit.
>>105897813waner 2 or bunny dsp
>>105897833Tanchjim Bunny by our Queen Asano.
Approved by /iemg/ and everyone, small, comfy, available on Amazon, and so cute it'll make all the office ladies fawn over you (based on real testimonies).
>>105897844>you can't graph itproof?
>I'm sure diagrams could be drawn to illustrate how you perceive where different sounds "placed" in your headyeah that's not what I'm asking and is irrelevant.
>99.999% of all reviews mention soundstageok? who asked?
>>105897876>and so cute it'll make all the office ladies fawn over you (based on real testimonies).that's a straight up lie
>>105897887Like you'd know anything about pulling in hot hags at work!
>>105897849because you have a hard-on for these convos that you anticipate sperging over every line and logic because you're coping. I think there's a pill for that
>>105897879this isn't a religion discussion. you don't have to be this emotionally involved in chinese plastic piece of monkey shit earbuds.
I think we can all agree that greasy pre-clogged secondhand ea500lm have no soundstage. Don't eat with IEMs on, fatso.
>>105897952pagpagnastyea500lmtrvthnvke.jpg
>>105897915you know that conversation would be over already if you actually were able to demonstrate your understanding of psychoacoustics? which you can't do lol
and only thing is left for you is to seethe for being called out
>>105897924>proof?>d-don't need to get emotionalask me how I know you are retarded
>>105897952>>105897966>>105898001you're samefagging because you know nobody here will save you. I don't have have to demonstrate anything to you. before even engaging in the topic, you went straight to dismissing my understanding of it. I'm not here to cater to your neurotic fuckin tendencies to always be right and have that validation on the goddamn internet. we've been here a million times already. also, you can't eq techs.
>posts idiotic facebook level theories
>gets called out
>goes schizo
you got me, i'm literally all of the posters in this thread
hilarious
he's so fucking mad
>>105898057>you can't eq techs.can't eq something that is not real
Tourist here do you guys still use PMPs like the 400$ Sony and shit. Or its a waste and its better to get a Hiby?
>>105898118>Or its a waste and its better to get a Hibythis
>>105898072>>105898093>>105898106it's all you. alone lol. almost sad, really
>>105897128Not enough bass but otherwise pretty good.
>>105898124>>105898143bro you are unironically schizoing out
chill
Techs come temperature differential effects on filters, skin, and pos.
>>105898123Why the Hiby sounds the same as a 400$ sony?
weeee
md5: 7461cc234f186cb7f10bc824dd2cd701
๐
>>105898143it TRULY is amazing how confident you are.
thoughts on the MOONDROP Rays? Im consider picking them up to be my gaming IEMS
>>105898181>thinks he can trick anons by changing the sourceactual crackhead schizo wtf
>>105898157...why wouldn't it?
>>105898201crack??? got any?????????????
>>105898200get the mays, same thing but less gaymery and without the retarded ugly inverted faceplate
Remember to remove BUNNY from OP
>>105898253while we're at it, remove the eq guide
>>105898200I think moondrop dropped the souse and are out of it with their overpriced shit
>>105898253you'd need to remove everything from OP if you'll be basing it on random measurements with poor channel matching
>>105898297Q1 Pro did nothing wrong!
>>105898308I think if people bought q1s from EPZ and get poor channel matching they should contact EPZ and shit on them in the reviews they get very pissy about it.
And if they can't actually hear it then it doesn't matter.
remember to laugh at vatnik ziggers getting blown to pieces by based zelenskyy's killer drones
>>105898419wrong thread, stranger
>>105898432i think this is the right thread i was told there was a butthurt russian furfag here was I wrong?
fission sound so much better than hexas
>>105898530i have both and fission sound better stock
IR-2
md5: 2870aa77038a6544f1807ce80c7d16b9
๐
EQzo, you have REW's powerful ass AutoEQ to match it 1:1, and yet you failed. We need a better proof. This is half-baked.
>>105898566class 3 listener moment
I am from the Draftdodginsky Oblast, I love doing meth and big dildos, tho i dont consider myself gay
>>105898568The main point of it is shown: FR and IR are linked. As described, this was done using REW's EQ matching, which is not precise enough, so I added manual EQ changes afterwards.
REW's EQ and arithmetic functions are not perfectly precise either, most noticeably at high frequencies.
If you are adamant that this needs fixing, I will do so when I can, but as it is the measurements show both the link and lack of use of IR as these differences can be attributed to differences in the FR.
>>105898572For AI slop, she's still pretty cute.
>>105898203cuz is cheaper and Sony is the finest crap
>>105898935audio performance in general does not correlate with price
>>105898935you don't want for PMP to color your sound in the first place
shit should sound transparent
at what point does a source start showing diminishing returns for pos?
>>105897078You are a sad broke faggot, acquire Hype R
>>105899410there are only a handful of "flagship," DACs implemented in >70% of devices. AK4493/AK4499, CS43131/CS43198, ES9039/ES9069.
These are the newest gen of these companies' DACs, and they all have good performance metrics. it's up the specific manufacturer to implement it well, with good supporting architecture to manage clock, jitter, and interface with inputs smoothly (allow high pcm/dsd decoding, reliable usb, etc.)
there are excellent sources from $50-$300. not much more needs to be spent, and you get into inverse returns (higher THD and higher noise floor with tube amps, R2R, or other B.S.).
>>105899410Diminishing returns start at apple dongle. At best you'll get better build, better software compatibility, more features. But not "better sound".
The blue vido are so good especially at $2.5 I can't get over them, I just wish the cable didnt feel so shit but I mean the whos complaining at that price. I need to clean out their aliexpress
>>105900123This is a good anwser. Same happens with iems, you dont wanna go too expensive, but dont cheap out either, something like tanchjims DMT 5 diaphragm will sound much better than some random LCPos.
>>105900419And if you scavenge your IEMs from a dumpster that's even better value.
>>105900667Based pagcore jollymaxxer
>>105894102It was never over for us.
>>105898716Drivertards will still believe in headfi nonsense even if you show 100% IR match. This is good enough.
>>105900757Dunning Kruger effect makes you think that your knowledge is absolute
>>105900825You think psychoacoustics is a burger, shush.
Tyvan Lam is currently the best IEM designer. EDC Pro is a masterpiece.
>>105900970True, look at all these edc pro enjoyers.
>>105900970I wonder if KZ knows what EDC stands for or they as usual pick three random symbols and called it a day.
>>105901111Exceptional Dynamics & Clarity for Professionals
>>105901111What does EPZ stand for?
I just got these and they are not honksmaxxed at all, whoever did those graphs is colluding with the vatnik.
Was fully expecting it to me brighter than Wyvern and its clearly very treble tame.
Liar, liar, cock on fire
>>105901434Why did you buy that pos...
>>105901447Frankly for 23 euros I paid, the cable, tips and case are worth it already
Are you a child of the universe?
https://youtu.be/kqzgA-jTO88?si=L8r2KSXUmXJIgbAL
>>105901434timestamp + post beside naked body as PROOF
Remember. Listen to your songs, not to your gear. Stop visiting audio equipment foruns and sites (including this general). Stop consuming audio equipment, go support the music artists you like and listen to more music.
>>105900267you get more power, meaning louder
and everybody knows louder is better
>>105902047Only listen to real music
https://youtu.be/VR0XfHWRqA8
>>105902095Needing more power is the number one indicator of shit tuning(or ears).
>>105902444it's an indicator of low-sensitivity, never 'shit tuning'. holy hell.
>>105902466No IEM has low sensitivity. Even old-school tinhifi planars with 90 something sensitivity run fine from apple dongle.
>>105902483have you a/b'd 30mw vs. 240mw?
>>10590258920% for good volume vs 2% for good volume(basically unusable without negative preamp).
>>105902444WHAT I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER THE RINGING IN MY EARS
>>105902466When there's not enough bass or treble you instinctively crank the volume up to compensate.
>>105902441I will say it now despite the seethe: gargantuan soundstage.
>>105902095that's bullshit. you a/b apple dongle off your phone with something like a ds2 and you can easily tell the difference.
>>105902605this is more about scaling and giving particular pos the juice they need, not so much volume. what have you heard scale when adding power?
you're right about negative pregain being necessary.
>>105902990>what have you heard scale when adding power?Nothing. If you match the volume then the sound is identical.
>>105902990hearing loss scales when adding power
Hello, fellow retards.
I need a Bunny -- same sound, fit, price -- but with a sane cable connector. No proprietary tanchjim bullshit.
What are my options?
>INB4 it's a regular 2pin
It's not, you can't buy replacement cables for bunny or One.
>>105903007sounds like a discernment issue.
>>105903022when adding volume, yes.
How durable are OP's recommended USB-C DACs? I listen while out a lot so I have phone in pocket and the DAC cable naturally bends at right-angle down out of the pocket because the headphone cables are longer. The UGREEN one I has worn from this over 6 months and now won't output left channel anymore unless I hold it specifically at this bent angle. I know they're only 10 bucks but it's annoying. Do these JCally ones with the braided cables last longer? Thx in advance frens.
>>105903451There's no physical mechanism by which an IEM can discern whether it receives 1V from a 30mW source or a 300mW source.
What is the opinion on the Aful explorer? Are there any similar priced alternatives?
>>105903356Salnotes zero original, maybe Moondrop Lan, based on graphs
>"it's not about more volume bro, it's about the headroom"
>look inside
>more volume
>>105903584if my 4head is a 5head, do I need more volume
>>105903670You need to give head.
>>105903678do i get edc pro if i do
>>105903551sine wave at 1V isnโt the same as transient-rich audio like busy music even film scores that have instruments, voice and ambient sounds, all competing to fit in the mix perfectly,
which only competent amps and speakers can accurately reproduce, without collapsing or distorting.
power delivery quality matters just as much as quantity
13523
md5: c8a061274d56204f56b751098f2da498
๐
>>105902441>>105901434Tbf I still prefer the QKZ x HBB, something about 2DD's is jarring to me, both the Draco and the Truthear Red
>>105903993I don't know if you've ever looked at a "transient-rich audio like busy music even film scores that have instruments, voice and ambient sounds, all competing to fit in the mix perfectly," but it's actually just voltage going up and down. When you set both to 1V peak its integrated power will be less than of a sine wave actually.
file
md5: f0a38a663fe209d6150638e6a05152ba
๐
>>105904035An actual amp stress test has a waveform that looks like a brick. No transients in sight, just constant power.
>>105901135Sounds about right.
>>105904035you're being pedantic about waveforms instead of talking about audible differences.
>>1059043971V is 1V. No matter the waveform, no matter the amp.
is light song by livetune still /iemg/'s favourite song?
>>105904423no it is not there are these things called damping factor and q
>>105904662Literally just output impedance.
>>105904423so you're saying audible differences do not exist, right?
>>105904715so you're deaf?
>>105904841are you a nihilist?
>>105903531meh they're not gonna last much longer
>>105903553alternative: kefine quatio
>>105904829Of course silly we call him deafzo for a reason
>>105903356>inb4 it's a regular 2-pinyo dummy, regular 2-pin DO fit tanchjim iems like the bunny perfectly fine, irrespective of the stock cable having longer pins
>>105898716Fair, but the anon's image that inspired you was 1:1. One can argue it's not the same since you can see some leftover.
>>105902441>>105901434wait why are you guys suddenly buying this random dumb shit?
>>105905546To own foxzo or something. Just went apeshit 2 weeks ago, completely unprovoked, and pranked themselves out of $30. Lmao!
DONT2
md5: 5ba001889812045a5f79da9e43c35528
๐
Let me just say that I am not an audiophile, I'm just curious about iem's. Ive never had good luck wearing earbuds that I could tolerate for more then 30 mins. Flatheads are the only ones I can tolerate for long periods of listening.
Is it worth looking into buying special eartips or bullethead gels? Ive always just felt uncomfortable or felt pressure build up in my ears canal after wearing gels so I'm wondering if I'm just built not to enjoy them.
Like to hear from other anons that found what worked for them.
>auto eq bunny to gate
>it doesn't sound like gate
>>105905882EQ it by ear
which frequencies sound different?
>eqing without reading the eq guide
>eqing without using peqdb
>>105904430We only listen to real music
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyPhsFxnc_c
>>105905901GYAAAAAATT THIS IS A W FAP ONG CUH
>>105905882Happened to at least 30% of techs retards(the rest never seen a graph in their entire life).
>>105905610It started from the "there are no openback iems" discussion. It was already known they're not openback. They still bought it.
>>105906090>cause I said so
>>105906090There are but /iemg/ isn't ready for this discussion.
>>105905747After trying too many tips, spinfit cp100 ss tips and narrow deep insertion iems like etymotics are the only ones I can use for more than about 4 hours at a time
>>105906090if I obstruct the nozzle and crank up the volume, sound is clearly coming out of the vents, so they are open back in that sense, and this definitely contributes to them feeling more spacious and less congested
>>105905882>auto EQ two iems to each other on all the squiglink databases that have both>the EQ profiles differ by ยฑ 3dbYou can't accurately EQ match two IEMs, the measurement and unit variation is too great.
>>105906414You won't believe what happens when you do this on regular vented IEMs...
>>105906466its just for fun anon, they do sound interesting, i dont think i got the honkmaxxed one, its also way more comfy than qkz x hbb fit wise
>>105906466Thinking an open design will lead to a more spacious sound is dentoid propaganda. Don't fall for it guys, you'll just lose out on Sub-bass.
>VeryFuhKaySchun nawt ree-kwired.
>>105906090thx anon ill look into these and try them out
>>105906528The sub-bass roll off is what makes it spacious!
niggas will do anything but buy a quirky iem for fun
>>105906579They can't afford it.
desu if some of those are kz stealth revised i wouldnt advice getting them in good conscience
>>105906579No I just don't want to buy an iem associated with some attention starved sperg who comes here to shit his pants over foxes.
>>105906697theres several fox hating schizos, I just want yall to stop buying the same iem over and over, its boring
>>105906720Nooo its only one guy everybody else loves trannyfox surely surely
>*3 years of fox*
>I sleep
>*someone remembers foxzo is russian*
>wtf "we" hate fox now!
>>105906791Correction: foxzo gets butthurt and deletes a bunch of joke posts and exposed himself as an eternally seething faggot
>>105906742based, my brother whacking these troons before they appear, that being said im not sure if the graphzo was being facetious, if some of those tri's are stealth revised I would be careful
editor here
why do i even bother with this anymore
>>105906801And he deleted
>>105898572 because uhh
*aneurism*
Hilarious, pretty sure mr fengru doesn't even post that much
>>105906822yeah he doesnt allow fox sloppa, yet I can post tanchjim feet all day
>10 summerfags cannot even produce as much vitriol as chuzo
yall fell off lmao
>>105906830No he just deletes posts and malds lmao
>its ukrainians
>its a newfag
>its hpg
>its the jimmies
>its /pol/
>its summerfags
whats next?
>>105906888>trips of truthhang up the paws you troons
>>105906961wow a /pol/ meme? naughty naughty
>>105906454depends on iem
you're telling me i cant eq my $10 pos to a $3000 one?
>>105907370you can if you read the eq guide
>>105907370You can't. I can, because I'm super intelligent and awesome and not a poor russian.
>>105907370you an but it's not a simple as autoEQing 2 random squigs online
>>105907370No, $10 drivers are too high quality.
same old regurgitated sloppa about eq....
Best budget techs monsters?
>>105907383make a case study out of curiosity
>>105907498yeah, they always claim they can eq to kilobuck, but they never show their eq or what pos they use, presumably for comedic reasons
>>105904430It's made by KZ, so the answer is yes.
Dummie here
>BudgetIdeally under 150$
>Intended use (media, source, environment)I wanna get an IEM for my waifu with custom cute anime prints on the "tips"(?)
Like this anon for example
>>105897776She listens to stuff almost exclusively on her samsung galaxy s25 via bluetooth or the usb-c port
>Frequency response preference and music examplesShe listens to a lot of classical music and podcasts on spotify, so sound fidelity isn't a huge concern I think
>Past gear and your thoughts on themShe's been using some pretty scuffed bluetooth JBL 500s for a while, recently her sister let her try some apple airpods and she was impressed with the sound quality relative to the JBLs but thought that the price was outlandish
I understand I can buy some basic ones on aliexpress or temu or whatever, but I was hoping there was some kind of one stop shop for my use case which would be a mid-ish quality sound with the ability to just customize the print
>>105907689EDC Pro + good cable + good eartips + EQ + paint job
>>105907689Aliexpress, official epz store, ask the seller, you can customize most of the IEMs. This is epz g10.
My triple flange toys arrive today, sistas. I can't wait to penetrate my ears!
>>105907746Good opportunity to become a flangebro like us.
>>105907689get her Both the epz's that are like $20 with the custom faceplate (not "tips" those are the silicon parts that go in your ears) AND if you want, the moondrop Space travel (tws) for $30. it'll give her the option of portable ones that are better than the jbl's and the custom pretty ones. and teach her about eq.
>>105907746shit hurts my ears too much so I just can't do it lol
>>105907689Totally organic post
After EQ, my EDC Pro is now as good as any other of my pos.
But why does nobody ever EQ one pos to another?
The real question is why EQ to another pos, when you can EQ to something better?
>>105907980>But why does nobody ever EQ one pos to another?researchers did
>The real question is why EQ to another pos, when you can EQ to something better?it's not a real question it doesn't really matter
>>105907980EQing one pos to another is a shartur meme, eqlets just didn't get the memo.
>>105908030how is it a meme at all
>>105908123>no IEM sounds good without EQ>EQ your IEM to something that doesn't sound goodGenius
>>105908143first point is simply not true
it all really depends on a lot of things
>>105908161Liking something without EQ is a skill issue.