>>105918193
>Nooo you're morality much match modern standards of sexual degeneracy or you can be canceled by the community.
Sure. It's not politics at all. The linux kernel is totall not actually fully pozzed now. One just needs to view Torvald's stances and policies concerning the kernel during this radicalized view of reality. It's worse than the days FreeBSD socialists would ban you for unrelared political dissent. Hubris and chutzpah is a motherfucker.
>>105918057
>Politics free in the world
There's a difference between total apolitical involvement and wanting to avoid being doxed, being swatted, being canceled, being removed from a project or becoming person non-grata for simply having a wrongthink position. Your position would only hold water if the "circlejerkers" had no reason to form an echo chamber in the first place. The "chuds" in this argument were deplatformed many times from leftist takeovers on social media platforms not too long ago.
>>105916460
>User apolitical stance is the best option
I wish this were true, but the sad reality is that if attention is given to the projects after ridiculous responses and abandonment of the first principles of software freedom for ALL, then they expand efforts. The action itself rewards policies that aren't helpful and rewards both sides for going into extremes. Ultimately, the code also suffers and lags behind just to ensure the "successes" of the poor oppressed. We now live in a world of extremes, where common goals with the "enemy" is still oppression, regardless if the code can be used independently of the ideology.
I focus my ire on the "tranny" side of this argument because you don't hear about trannies or other leftists being removed for wrongthink on the "chud" projects. Granted, I have taken your approach pretty much as well and try to ignore the unnecessary drama. However, it can't be denied that the code suffers from the loss of competent programmers, and the flaming distraction of weaponized differences
