← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106121989

32 posts 12 images /g/
Anonymous No.106121989 [Report] >>106122193 >>106122318 >>106122425 >>106122761 >>106123022 >>106123099 >>106123303
does anybody even use this shit in 2025?
Anonymous No.106122070 [Report] >>106122104 >>106122584
i don't know what this is and how can it help me get a gf?
Anonymous No.106122104 [Report]
>>106122070
you can be my gf, big boi. bend over and spread em.
Anonymous No.106122193 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
No.
Anonymous No.106122274 [Report]
No
/thread
Anonymous No.106122297 [Report] >>106122361
mogged by xue
Anonymous No.106122318 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
Naw mate. I like keyboard shortcuts for my desktop. And beyond that LXDE was better.
Anonymous No.106122361 [Report] >>106122379 >>106122385 >>106122430 >>106122737
>>106122297
mogged by MATE
Anonymous No.106122379 [Report]
>>106122361
>no cute rat logo
worthless
Anonymous No.106122385 [Report] >>106122677 >>106122710
>>106122361
false, mate is jewish and gay
Anonymous No.106122425 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
lxde is better
Anonymous No.106122430 [Report] >>106122517
>>106122361
>gtk3
nope
Anonymous No.106122517 [Report] >>106122830
>>106122430
what do you think XFCE uses?
Anonymous No.106122584 [Report]
>>106122070
/r9k/ is this way
>>>/r9k/
Anonymous No.106122677 [Report]
>>106122385
>The rat, when cornered, starts fabricating lies in self-defense
You guys definitely have a better mascot though
Anonymous No.106122710 [Report]
>>106122385
I keep seeing pictures of this rat. This makes me happy
Anonymous No.106122737 [Report] >>106122831
>>106122361
All the bloat of modern GNOME with all of the buginess of old GNOME.
Anonymous No.106122761 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
I use it on my shitty chromebook. It works, at the very least.
Anonymous No.106122830 [Report]
>>106122517
i don't use xfce, i use lxde
Anonymous No.106122831 [Report] >>106122842
>>106122737
that's XFCE though
Anonymous No.106122842 [Report] >>106122929
>>106122831
No it's actually MATE.
Anonymous No.106122929 [Report] >>106122953
>>106122842
nope, honest mistake though no worries bud
Anonymous No.106122953 [Report] >>106122959
>>106122929
You are literally using an eternally-hotfixed version of 2009 GNOME.
Anonymous No.106122959 [Report] >>106122976
>>106122953
funny, it was updated last month
Anonymous No.106122976 [Report] >>106123013
>>106122959
Your desktop environment that has been the same since 2009 still needs to be patched? Um, yikes!
Anonymous No.106123013 [Report] >>106123068 >>106123551
>>106122976
looks pretty changed to me. unless you're the jeet that still uses LXDE, all of them get updates.
it's okay kiddo, some day you'll learn to accept that you're just wrong on most things. that's when you start to learn :)
Anonymous No.106123022 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
I tried it but kde is very good so...
Anonymous No.106123068 [Report]
>>106123013
>looks pretty changed to me.
Please explain in as much detail as possible what "looks changed" to you.
Anonymous No.106123092 [Report]
Unfortunately I'm too used to gnome workflow and it working OOTB to go back.
s0ychan No.106123099 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
Ye it's good if you want to escape nu-GTK and not deal with the bugginess of KDE
Anonymous No.106123303 [Report]
>>106121989 (OP)
i do cus i value a modular Qt DE. i disable the panel and default WM and use everything else. way better than a standalone WM setup with a bunch of disparate apps to match the functionality of a DE
Anonymous No.106123551 [Report]
>>106123013
>brings up jeets out of nowhere
bro they live rent-free in your head