Thread 106145635

Technology that will cure my homosexuality?

>>106145635 (OP)
Estrogen.

>>106145635 (OP)
also >>>/lgbt/
go back

>>106145635 (OP)
None (I tried)

>>106145650
oh my fucking good am I really stuck like this? please god no please NO

>>106145635 (OP)
Weaponize it.
Get a mac, be annoying, get the Steve Jobs look, buy many Porsches with the money you make.

>>106145660
Look on the bright side.
At least you don't have to put up with women.

>>106145730
>implying
The few straight /g/ users there are have 0 chance with women in the first place.
And the gay ones are still mostly incels.

>>106145635 (OP)
Exercise, eat well and sleep at least 7 hours. Testosterone will do the rest.

>>106145635 (OP)
It's technology which caused it.
Touch grass.

>>106145635 (OP)
You get to have sex without creating life, pat yourself on the back
You won

>>106145635 (OP)
Trooning out does the job

>>106145635 (OP)
>Get job
>Earn money
>Flight to Southeast asia
>Find a semi-decent bug creature to bang
>???
>Not gay anymore

>>106145635 (OP)
Dating me online.
You'll realize your mistake and switch back to banging broads

>>106146032
I can't tell if this is a self-deprecating comment (male) or a self-aggrandizing one (female.)

>>106145635 (OP)
The defaggotization chamber

Be a cool faggot like ecker

>>106145635 (OP)
It wont cure it but nice that you see that it is a disease.

Probably not X

>>106146050
The first one.
This shouldn't have even been a question, there's no girls on the internet

>>106145635 (OP)
This kind of evil desire can come about in different ways. Congenital deffect, literal brain damage later in life, child sexual abuse, exposure to certain chemicals, indoctrination, porn habits that got out of control or even demonic possession.

Tech could potentially help with all of these save for the last one. Ultimately you need to be able to physically and permanently rewire the brain, which thing has proved unsuccessful up to this point, but at least the specific parts of the brain involved in this abnormal exchange are known so there's hope. Maybe Musk can drill a whole in your skull and zap the fag out?

Noble pursuit, but don't leave God and His healing power out of the equation.

>>106145730
>the bright side.
Yeah.

>>106145635 (OP)
cunny addiction

>>106145635 (OP)
Shock therapy

>>106145635 (OP)
Men are gross, how can you like them? I don't understand.

>>106145635 (OP)
Islam says fasting is good for curbing sexual thoughts. Also, stop watching porn and gooning everyday

>>106146969
Muhammad fucked children and worshipped a moon devil.

>>106146968
Men are bros, not gross.
>how can you like them
It's a spiral into depravity initiated from being in a sexual society with whorish women and horny men that goon to porn and "respect women".
Add to that the "get canceled or accept 'pride'" mentality, and popularization/memefication of things like 'trap' and zesty among normies.

>>106146981
Women nowadays call men pedos for liking petite women. Please proceed to marry a roastie with 4 kids from 3 different fathers to prove you're not a pedo.
Also, post nose.

>>106147039
Anything that can birth children safely is fair game. Normal 9yo's, not a chance in hell.

>>106146968
Biceps. Also pecs. Also ass.

>>106147049
That's exactly what Islam teaches. Mental (i.e. not ignorant/safeeh) and physical maturity (puberry) is a prerequisite plus consent from both parties and marriage announcements makes it valid.
What do Christians believe as the proper age of marriage? We at least know for the Jews it is 3 years and 1 day.

>>106145635 (OP)
COCKS
IN YOUR ASS

>>106147093
Mohammed married a 6 year old and fondled her, then fucked her when she was 9.
Islam teaches that Mohammed was the perfect man.
Gee, I sure wonder why child marriage is so common in Islam.

>>106145635 (OP)
guns (kys)

>>106147093
9yo is pedo territory, there's no pussyfooting around that. What I said about fair game is basically what the bible conveys with everything it covers regarding marriage and sex, if you're honest and use your common sense to piece it together.

>>106145635 (OP)
Read some interesting stuff about the 'mectin wrt this on other boards. Could be bullshit but seems relatively safe.

>>106147114
She was engaged at 6 to another man, but it was broken off because the other party hated her and her parents for becoming muslims.
That is the social norm of that time. Everyone was marrying around that age.
Why do you think early marriage is a problem for people that are physically and mentally capable?
This very point is the reason why India will become majority muslim in a few dozen years, because while hindus are busy raping relatives and aborting children, indian muslims are busy marrying at a young age with high fertility rate.
Do you have any argument except >9 years old? We knows and it's accepted, because we don't worship feminists or obey jews or appease them by rejecting what God has made permissible.
You also didn't answer my question about Christians.
Actually, what other religion sets physical and mental maturity as criteria for marriage (a religious construct)?
Christians, jews, and hindus don't even have a limit for the number of wives, let alone a reasonable criteria for marriage that feels natural.

>>106147168
>Christians, jews, and hindus don't even have a limit for the number of wives.

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” (Genesis 2:24)

One wife, one flesh, not rocket science.

>>106147125
A 13 year old Mary marrying a 90 something year old man is acceptable by christians. Can (you) piece things together? Rebecca was how many years old again?
It wasn't until the late 1800s that people came up with this silly argument.
You think those before you who hated Islam and wrote critiques wouldn't love to mention this? They would, but early marriage was so normal socially that they didn't even think of it in their arguments nor did they want to made a fool by bashing on something the majority practices.

>>106147218
Here's where I stand on this issue: >>106147049

>>106147198
Why are you insincere? Before this verse, it is talking about about Adam and Eve. A man naturally lies with his wife, but where is the limit on wives though? You realize one flesh means union and not number of wives, right?
Since you acknowledge Genesis from the old testament then surely having 999 women like Solomon is OK?

do you think glp-1 drugs would help with this?
they seem to help with everything else

>>106147230
>shares opinion
>claims the bible agrees
>bible doesn't agree
>Aaaaanyways, Here's my view:
You NPCs are always silenced by simple questions. See >>106147218 and >>106147168
Late 1800 arguments can't hold a candle to the entire history of mankind and God's laws. Fools like you parrot 9 year old, when the majority of their grandparents were married early.

Stop obeying feminists and moralities of a sexualized society that allows nudity, polamory, adultery, but NOT marriage for God forbid you marry early instead of turning gay or frustrated or marry multiple wives instead of cheating or marry instead of having a 6 year old girlfriend.

>>106147276
>Why are you insincere? Before this verse, it is talking about about Adam and Eve. A man naturally lies with his wife, but where is the limit on wives though?

It's throughout the bible if you study it. In the OT, God is married to one nation only; Israel. In the NT, God is married to one people only; His Church.

>You realize one flesh means union and not number of wives, right?

That would be correct had He also said wives (plural).

>Since you acknowledge Genesis from the old testament then surely having 999 women like Solomon is OK?

Nope. God put up with a lot of things, but it was never His perfect will:

“Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.” (Deuteronomy 17:17)

“He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.” (Matthew 19:8)

>>106147337
If the bible doesn't agree on this (or rather the other way arround), then where do you find the "it's ok to fuck children" verse?

>>106147299
you'd still be gay, you'd just have a very slightly easier time being celibate.

>>106147299
Gluttony => visceral fat does indeed change body hormones.
GLP1 agonists prevent having a typical american day of high caloric burden, which also ruins hormones, visibly fatigues the person, ruins sleep, etc.
AKA it's the druggy alternative to Islamic fasting
The questions now are: would anyone be okay with risking GI paralysis and being a textbook example of nausea & vomiting 24/7?

>>106147366
Christians have no limit on age of marriage. Jews do at 3 years and a day. Hence, Rebecca, Mary, etc are examples that age gap is OK and 3 years old marriage is also OK in the bible, unlike your claim (can birth children).

>>106146895
Have they tried just not having sex with HIV infected people?

Maybe you should consider religion. There is no homosexuality in the catholic church, for example. They cured it by fucking boys.

>>106147276
“A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;” (1 Timothy 3:2)

“Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.” (1 Timothy 3:12)

“If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.” (Titus 1:6)

Notice the "one wife". These verses are specifically aimed at people seeking an office in the church, but one may ask himself, why just one? The answer is obvious, that's God's better choice for us.

get a BBC and enjoy life

>>106145635 (OP)
The same way you can introduce any new fetish or sexual preference. Gradual exposure.
Masturbate to increasingly feminine men, then at some point start introducing extremely masculine females (bodybuilders, FtMs, etc), concentrating on the masculine characteristics you like.
By being so gradual that you always have at least something you can latch onto, every time you masturbate to something slightly outside your comfort zone you're associating the arousal with the new thing.
Do it for long enough and you'll eventually become a bisexual (sorry you can't really cure your attraction to men).

>>106147428
“And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.” (Genesis 1:22)

Children cannot multiply.

>>106147432
Is this supposed to be an ironic post, because it is.

>>106147346
>God is married to one nation
>God is married to one people
Why are you like this? God fucks the nation of Israel according to you? This is clearly not about man-woman bond, but that of a God and servants bond.
Why can't you be like normal christians and not mention God's marriage? Mary, who is both the wife of god (father), with holy spirit "seed", and mother of god (human) is surely having an awkward time in Christian heaven. Good God.
>had He also said wives
Nope. "A man lies with his wife" has no authoritative take on dictating how many wives the man in question has, but still applies to any wife a man has.
>verse about choosing the king of israelites
LMAO so you just proved it is allowed, but the king of israelites must not practice it. The verse preceeding it says the king also shouldn't have many horses LMAO.
>verse about allowing divorce
Stop taking things out of context.
>never his perfect will
So things went against God's will? Prophets like Solomon disobeyed God by having hundreds of wives?

>>106147542
>Muhh dogma
Don't care. Fuck jewish superstition.

>>106147480
Genesis again? Tell that to the Jews that think diddling girls less than 3 and boys less than 9 isn't real intercourse. They clearly see no issue in marriage with 3 years + 1 day old girls, for it will be fruitful eventually.

>>106147592
Optimized resource utilization. Very /prog/

>>106147461
>Timothy, Titus
>paul: blabbers about, no proof
>Pauline worshiper: that's God's better choice for us
Who is your God? Paul?
I agree that God's command is the best for us, but we differ about the choice in question and that we have authentic narration chains, unlike your "I saw Jesus in a dream" "is totally not a disciple" dude.

>>106145902
This. Also avoid drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and caffeine. Stay chill do pic rel.

>>106145639
>>106146023
If you want to speedrun sleeping in a coffin that is sure a good way to start.

>>106145635 (OP)
stop watching porn

>>106145902
Nearly half of LGBT are "people of color" (who are high testosterone) and half of those raise children. How lovely and totally not nightmare fuel.

>>106145675
Agreed. Fucking use it.

>>106145988
Been using technology all my life and I fucking love women. Stop making excuses.

>>106146016
Thanks for the gold, kind stranger.

>>106147732
Can't groom the next generation if you don't create new groomers.

>>106147542
>Why are you like this? God fucks the nation of Israel according to you?

It's a spiritual bond.

>This is clearly not about man-woman bond, but that of a God and servants bond.

“¶ Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband, so have ye dealt treacherously with me, O house of Israel, saith the Lord.” (Jeremiah 3:20)

“For thy Maker is thine husband; the Lord of hosts is his name; and thy Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall he be called. For the Lord hath called thee as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when thou wast refused, saith thy God.” (Isaiah 54:5-6)

>Why can't you be like normal christians and not mention God's marriage? Mary, who is both the wife of god (father), with holy spirit "seed", and mother of god (human) is surely having an awkward time in Christian heaven. Good God.

Mary was simply a vessel for the incarnation of God. She was married to Joseph, not God.

>Nope. "A man lies with his wife" has no authoritative take on dictating how many wives the man in question has, but still applies to any wife a man has.

Again, the context (local and full bible scope) leads to this conclusion. Just take a look at the parallel discussion on sex; God never says "Don't fuck anybody below this specific age", but it's heavily implied when you take all things into consideration.

>>106147542
>LMAO so you just proved it is allowed, but the king of israelites must not practice it. The verse preceeding it says the king also shouldn't have many horses LMAO.

Again, it was allowed but it was never God's perfect will for anybody, and that's why He didn't want the king to get involved in that because through the king, the whoke nation fell, as we read later on in the bible. You just need to read the stories involving Jacob's wives and Elkanah's wives and Solomon's wives; absolute misery.

>Stop taking things out of context.

I didn't quote that verse to support monogamy, I quoted that verse to show that Moses had to deal with rebels and gave commandments to the Israelis that did not necessarily allign with God's perfect will, and so is the case with allowing many wives.

>So things went against God's will? Prophets like Solomon disobeyed God by having hundreds of wives?

Of course. The whole bible is a clusterfuck of historical records of relentless disobedience. Hardly anybody obeyed God.

>>106147572
The jews get that filth from their own writtings, not from God's word.

>>106147958
>Again, it was allowed
Plus no hard limits i.e. christianity allows polygamy without a set limit.
End of discussion.

>>106147690
Anything that's in the King James Bible God has approved for our learning and admonition, and Paul was raised by Jesus Himself to bring in the gentiles into the commonwealth of God by the preaching of the cross and the revelation of mysteries regarding Jesus and His church.

>>106147991
Putting up with something is not the same as being ok with it. E.g. God did not intend for people to be divorced for stupid reasons, but Moses allowed it because people's obstinate, hardened hearts, as the verse I quoted plainly spits out. The issue if polygamy is no different.

Ultimately, as a christian you want to obey God's perfect will, not Moses imperfect permissiveness.

>>106145902
Fags are more likely to be high test, lift weights and take testosterone thatn heteros.

>>106145635 (OP)
Tomboys (not technology).

>>106147710
>speedrun sleeping in a coffin
why? sleeping in coffin is comfier than in bed

>>106145635 (OP)
firearm (shoot yourself)

>>106145635 (OP)
A handgun and a bullet.

>>106147759
I own about that many guns. Still hook up with dudes. They're different hobbies

bunch of fat bipedos on here