← Home ← Back to /g/

Thread 106213208

16 posts 6 images /g/
Anonymous No.106213208 >>106213294 >>106214120 >>106214175 >>106214241 >>106214254 >>106214279 >>106214380 >>106215843 >>106217676
>get linked a xweet
>every reply is "@grok confirm sir", "@grok what is your geostrategic analysis on this matter", "@grok is this real", "@grok what is this post about"
What the fuck? I thought that was a meme.
Are we building an underclass of people who fully outsource their thoughts to the machine?
Anonymous No.106213294
>>106213208 (OP)
Yes. Next?
Anonymous No.106214074
@grok thoughts on this?
Anonymous No.106214120 >>106214182 >>106214294
>>106213208 (OP)
This underclass had already outsourced their thinking to (((experts))), (((journalists))) and (((politicians))).

Nothing changed, just add (((AI))) to the list of shabbos goys.
Anonymous No.106214175
>>106213208 (OP)
the scary part is how readily they believe whatever stupid made-up shit it hallucinates
Anonymous No.106214182 >>106214254 >>106216001
>>106214120
You are retarded. The archetype of guy who posts @grok is this true is a guy like you.
I.e., the kind of guy to poo-poo experts and journalists instead of listening to them.
God you're such a slave.
Anonymous No.106214195
@grok please explain sar
Anonymous No.106214241
>>106213208 (OP)
Why do you fall for the lowest hanging trigger available? I @ grok just to get reactions.
Anonymous No.106214254
>>106213208 (OP)
>>106214182
nobody cares
Anonymous No.106214279
>>106213208 (OP)
A lot of shit on Twitter is fake and even if Grok is the authority on truth or always accurate it does provide helpful context on whatever a tweet is going on about. Too many people post intentionally vague things to farm engagement and Grok is the easiest way to get the context that was intentionally left out.
Anonymous No.106214294 >>106216001
>>106214120
But the @grok people are usually those with your disposition, "do your own research" illiterate idiots that want affirmation from the "redpilled" AI.
Anonymous No.106214380 >>106214858
>>106213208 (OP)
>Are we building an underclass of people who fully outsource their thoughts to the machine?
Said the OP who couldn't figure this out on their own. lol
Anonymous No.106214858
>>106214380
>what is a rhetorical question
Anonymous No.106215843
>>106213208 (OP)
Indeed, though twitter is largely botted to hell now
Anonymous No.106216001
>>106214182
>>106214294
>The world is divided to either free-thinking libs who resist the establishment by trusting the experts, or Drumpf cultists who think the Earth is flat and climate change is a hoax
I sincerely pity you
Anonymous No.106217676
>>106213208 (OP)
it's intentional it's all part of the plan