>>106299129
This is a dumb argument.
Two things wrong with it. First, am I to be magically transported into a parallel reality where there's no wheels? Or is it predicated on some disaster happening in our world, where all wheels are destroyed overnight next Thursday?
Second, if we're being "logical", you probably envision a scenario where I'd be somehow born in a world without wheels? In this case, I'd be born to parents who would teach me how to survive in said world.
The third thing wrong with the entire premise is that the whole notion of the "invention" of the wheel is ironic. Some empty headed academic first proposed the idea of the "invention" of the wheel, then everybody started making fun of that, usually depicting if in the form of a useless stone wheel, even in cartoons. The sarcastic mentions went over people's heads and people started actually picturing the funny depictions as something that actually happened.
It's like asking who created the first table leg? You know, during the time where tables still didn't have legs. Who created the table is a moot point of course, we're only talking about the table leg here. Or who invented the shirt hem. Before that, people just wore shirts without a hole for their head.
