Thread 106319516

Useful to anyone?
https://pastebin.com/JQE7d9BW

>>106319516 (OP)
no, it’s useful to google who invented it to save bandwidth. it’s a shit codec and im convinced the webp schizos on this board are paid google employees

>>106319615
you are retarded

>>106319615
Maybe schizos like you should look at the link instead of assuming context from the image.

>try to give /g/ something useful
>ignored because my OP isn't an AI related slop general thread or obvious low quality bait
delete this site

>>106319725
kek, what did you expect? pastebin is only used by spammers. use the code tags.

>>106319788
character limit, you retarded dumbass. no useful script can fit in a post.

>>106319828
kek, even after I told you to your face why your post flopped you refuse to accept it. Nobody here is gonna read a wall of text in a pastebin about converting webp to png or jpeg you dumb cunt.

>>106319516 (OP)
>>106319725
>>106319828
Stop wasting time and effort, just recommend people use squoosh. The bitching and whining will never end until this shit ass site adds support anyway.

https://squoosh.app/

Anyway I saved picrel from a while ago and from what other experts are saying online when WEBP was first released around 2010 it wiped the floor with the old jpeg turbo encoder. However modern jpeg encoder have gotten better and no longer rape images with excessive blocky artefacting and the compression efficiency gains of WEBP are no longer worth the loss of compatibility anymore.

but I wanted JXL

>>106319937
It's 70 lines of code. Even a retarded cunt like you who has no business on /g/ could read it.

>>106319954
>Stop wasting time and effort, just recommend people use squoosh
nobody wants to manually convert shit

>>106320010
That's the only fucking thing these monkeys understand.

>>106319983
JXL will never be an image format just like Millhouse will never be a meme.

>>106319516 (OP)
But more importantly, when will 4Chan support this? WebP is everywhere now, and I hate to run my pics trough a converter every time I wanna post something in WebP.

>>106320061
genuine question

isn't it straight up a jpg replacement?

>>106320068
Not exactly, see >>106319954

But by volume there's more jpeg turbo jpeg images than there are jpegli jpeg images.

>>106319516 (OP)
>>106319725
4chanXT already has this seamlessly integrated.

>>106320068
>isn't it straight up a jpg replacement?
In theory, kinda. In practice, not really. As an original format, it's marginally better and capable of looking subjectively better than jpeg at the same size. However, nobody uses it as an original format, instead using it to crush down other files as much as possible, quality be damned.
It actually has a lossless mode like PNG that's straight up better in most ways, but again nobody uses webp for anything but shitty samples.
The real jpeg replacement is JXL, which can shrink the size of existing jpegs with absolutely no quality loss, and is a much more powerful format all around.

>>106320089
>4chanXT
dunno what that is, don't need it. not installing 70,000 lines of jeetscript when 70 will do.

>>106320296
>70,000 lines of jeetscript
BUT SAAR! YOU CANNOT ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING WITHOUT AT LEAST 2.7MB OF MINIMIZED JAVASCRIPT! TO TEST IF A NUMBER IS ODD YOU MUST IMPORT 3607 DIFFERENT LIBRARIES SAAR.

>>106320357
plz do the needful and run millions of lines of unverifiable javascript.

>>106319615
fpbp

>>106320580
mouth breather

Google aren't sending their best to shill webp on 4chan

>>106320706
not a single person in this thread has shilled webp

>>106319516 (OP)
I hate it, no image editor, software or OS supports them, I just convert them to jpg or png someway, or just find another source that's in correct format