>>107103362
Do you really think jpegli will catch on?
4chan Search
11 results for "a3e5a12853f8e2a3856bb5cef8c3dfd0"
Also anybody using jpegli yet? Kinda makes Webp obsolete IMHO.
I have a crazy idea, why not ban tech illiterates like OP? Like what would we have to lose by not allowing them to post? They can lurk all they want and cry on twitter about their dogshit e-celeb controlled opinions all day long and at the same time 4chan gets its ad revenue.
On a related note, has anyone started using jpegli for personal use yet? Like it's a pretty solid competitor to Webp IMHO.
On a related note, has anyone started using jpegli for personal use yet? Like it's a pretty solid competitor to Webp IMHO.
>>106634818
>30 year old boomer jpeg gives it a run for its money in some types of content.
In the OP source mentioned, mozjpeg was used. If compared to libjpeg-turbo then webp achieves like 40% better compression efficiency. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where Webp does "lose" is when you compare it to 444 JPG as it retains more color information and unsurprisingly can achieve a higher quality ceiling that Webp can't because it's limited to 420.
>30 year old boomer jpeg gives it a run for its money in some types of content.
In the OP source mentioned, mozjpeg was used. If compared to libjpeg-turbo then webp achieves like 40% better compression efficiency. You have no idea what you're talking about.
Where Webp does "lose" is when you compare it to 444 JPG as it retains more color information and unsurprisingly can achieve a higher quality ceiling that Webp can't because it's limited to 420.
>>106319516
>>106319725
>>106319828
Stop wasting time and effort, just recommend people use squoosh. The bitching and whining will never end until this shit ass site adds support anyway.
https://squoosh.app/
Anyway I saved picrel from a while ago and from what other experts are saying online when WEBP was first released around 2010 it wiped the floor with the old jpeg turbo encoder. However modern jpeg encoder have gotten better and no longer rape images with excessive blocky artefacting and the compression efficiency gains of WEBP are no longer worth the loss of compatibility anymore.
>>106319725
>>106319828
Stop wasting time and effort, just recommend people use squoosh. The bitching and whining will never end until this shit ass site adds support anyway.
https://squoosh.app/
Anyway I saved picrel from a while ago and from what other experts are saying online when WEBP was first released around 2010 it wiped the floor with the old jpeg turbo encoder. However modern jpeg encoder have gotten better and no longer rape images with excessive blocky artefacting and the compression efficiency gains of WEBP are no longer worth the loss of compatibility anymore.
>>106040390
VP9 was added recently like a few years ago so OP isn't incorrect I think. Before that we could only use VP8 which fucking blows and is only like 20% better than mozjpeg.
VP9 should fare better especially since it supports 10-bit but at the same time many hardware VP9 hardware decoders do not support 10-bit so maybe it's a wash...
VP9 was added recently like a few years ago so OP isn't incorrect I think. Before that we could only use VP8 which fucking blows and is only like 20% better than mozjpeg.
VP9 should fare better especially since it supports 10-bit but at the same time many hardware VP9 hardware decoders do not support 10-bit so maybe it's a wash...
>>105988627
Honestly at this point I'm becoming more convinced that Hiro sees 4chan more as a side business, like a little crackhouse on the outskirts of tokyo. This is highly evidenced by the fact that not even Webp is supported yet despite the image format increasing in popularity recently and having over 10+ years of security hardening behind it.
Honestly at this point I'm becoming more convinced that Hiro sees 4chan more as a side business, like a little crackhouse on the outskirts of tokyo. This is highly evidenced by the fact that not even Webp is supported yet despite the image format increasing in popularity recently and having over 10+ years of security hardening behind it.
>>105980176
BUT the real question is will jpegli succeed where mozjpeg failed?
BUT the real question is will jpegli succeed where mozjpeg failed?
Have you started using webp for personal images yet? It's fast to encode/decode and has more software support than tel-avif and jew xl.
>>105938571
picrel mostly
picrel mostly
>>105936877
It's nowhere near as bad as the rotting corpses known as JPG/H264 persisting in 2025. We only have corporations pushing cloud storage on us because keep using uber outdated technologies that take up TBs of storage space.
It's nowhere near as bad as the rotting corpses known as JPG/H264 persisting in 2025. We only have corporations pushing cloud storage on us because keep using uber outdated technologies that take up TBs of storage space.