Thread 106320606

>kde can't do math
why would people use this buggy software when xfce exists

There is no defined standard on if implicit multiplication and division comes before explicit in order of operations. That said, the results should be consistent with each other

>>106320606 (OP)
Post beef.

>>106320606 (OP)
>6/2(2+1)
>6/2(3)
>3(3)
The division symbol isn't a vinculum.
>Parentheses
>Exponents
>M/D left to right
>A/S left to right

>>106320730
OP, the absolute buffoon, completely forgot about Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally

>>106320606 (OP)
You're dumb
L2 ooo.

>>106320606 (OP)
>posted it again award

>>106320776
In South Asia it's BODMAS
t. obsessed with Jeets

>>106320689
This. The equation is a math version of spaghetti code and no one should ever write like that.

>>106320730
this is not how you do common core math you stupid faggit.

>>106320776
I included PEMDAS in my description and showed you.
I'm sorry you were taught Multiplication comes before Division, and Addition before Subtraction. These reverse operations are treated equally in an equation.

>>106320908
Then explain it to me. Because the only thing common core does is grouping, which is normally done mentally. Forcing mental shortcuts and thought processes to the unenthused is retarded, but that is exactly what all math teaches regardless of how you get there.

>>106320914
wrong

>>106320938
Source?
Text in a picture without source means nothing.

>>106320947
https://www.storyofmathematics.com/glossary/order-of-operations/

>>106320938
source?

>>106320956
see >>106320952

>>106320606 (OP)
Looks fine to me.

>>106320606 (OP)
>The /g/ version of a /sci/ thread

>>106320938
>>106320952
and? let me guess you trust every bullshit site on the internet?

>>106320938
I tried contacting these people to ask why their explanation of PEMDAS is different from everyone else and they didn't reply.
But their opinion doesn't really matter because it had already been decided in the 19th century that multiplication and division had equal precedence.

In the end, these are just agreed upon standards of how to assume precedence. So long as both parties agree on the precedence it can be whatever you want.
If you want to be explicit, use parentheses.

>>106320952
Uses to at odds Order of Operations called conventions. This site says it also uses wikipedia as a source, so since it considers that relevant, pic related. There are many more examples. Your source is retarded, but it didn't source that particular page.

>>106321024
It's for the repeatability within the context of communication.

>>106320606 (OP)
This is why RPN exists

>>106320606 (OP)
Every single source uses a different order of operations than they described.

jesus you people are fucking stupid lol

>>106321024
>decided
by who?

>>106320606 (OP)
>The amount of retards that took the b8
Fucking kek

>>106320606 (OP)
bait thread

>>106321174
It is an obvious bait thread. They're still fun from time to time. Explain the storyofmathematics.com though.

>>106321223
>>106321437
samefag

>>106321516
Maybe >>106321437 and >>106321460 are.

>>106320689
OP Image is literally about software not understanding algebra rule 1. Wtf are you talking about?

>>106320606 (OP)
if you cant write math expressions without allowing ambiguity you are retarded
>inb4 its not ambigious because of this retarded acronym I was taught in elementary school

>>106320689
There is. Did you skip middle school?

>>106323219
It's literally not ambiguous.
P
E
M or D depending on which one is first
A or S depending on which one is first

There is no room for ambiguity. These are the rules. Either you accept them, or you're retarded.

>>106323309
THE M AND D AND A AND S ARE GROUPED AND INTERCHANGEABLE YOU FUCKING RETARD IT'S PE(MD)(AS) AND IT ALWAYS HAVE BEEN YOU JUST WERENT FUCKING PAYING ATTENTION OR YOU WERE TOO FUCKING BUSY DIGGING IN YOUR ASS TO HEAR THE TEACHER BUT I"M BEGGING YOU IF THIS ISNT RAGE BAIT TO FUCKING KILL YOURSELF AND MAKE THE PLANET A BETTER PLACE

>It's not ambigious!!
*literally ambiguity within next post
>>106323309
>>106323328
If only we had a syntax for situations like this

>>106323328
How is this different from what I said, schizo?