Thread 106356776

Is it down or did they change domain again?

>>106356776 (OP)
who cares faggot get a life

>>106356811
You've got your own thread there, haven't you.

>>106356828
nta but most people cant fathom spending 1000s of hours stalking a random loser online that is slightly more pathetic than you
you need help lil nigga

>>106356776 (OP)
This board isn't tech support for retards. Nobody here cares about Kiwifarms. Null is a grifter and you are a brainlet.

>>106356776 (OP)
Nool didn't take Kingcobra's death well...

>>106356776 (OP)
>>106356891
Can confirm. Null lost it last stream

>>106356811
this is a very big deal. my gang stalking website is down rn :(

no one care about that place for low lifes.

>>106356884
Null is the only person who truly cares about free speech online you'd think fa/g/s would support him
>>106356965
The farms isn't about 'gang stalking' it's about collecting and sharing information about interesting online individuals

>>106356988
Nobody cares about free speech and arguments for free speech are just slave morality. Null argues for it, because he is in a position of weakness and this particular form of slave morality is an attempt to protect the weak from the strong. If Null were in a position of strength, he'd be censoring people and things he doesn't like. This is true of essentially every free speech advocate who has ever existed. Humans love censorship when it is pointed at people, ideas or groups they don't like, and despise it when it is pointed at people, ideas or groups they do like. The only thing that really matters is asking who has power to impose censorship, since power will be determining where censorship is applied and against whom. Trying to convince people you are a free speech warrior, so that they support you and you have more resources to fight the censorship aimed at you is just a grift, and I would respect him more if he openly admitted that he does not care about free speech broadly, but feels the Kiwifarms has a right to exist. He doesn't do this, because it is much harder to argue the merits of a specific website with a bad reputation than it is to argue in favor of free speech more broadly.

>tl;dr: Null has about a 130 IQ, and he is pretty good at manipulating people with IQs 100 and less, which is a good description of the majority of his site's users.

>>106356988
>Null is the only person who truly cares about free speech online you'd think fa/g/s would support him

Which is why I was banned after talking to the k_w_fa_ms people after 1 day.

>Get this fucking pdo out of here
>On it!
>BA_NED!

Get the fuck out of here christian.
YHWH allows child brides.
Bring your version of "free speech" with you.
Dipshit fuck.

>>106356988
>it isn't about gang stalking
>it's just a place for people to group up and cyberstalk someone
>if you didn't want to get cyberstalked you shouldn't have used the internet

>>106357107
>>106356988
>free speech online you'd

I was banned after 1 day.

>>106357111
>jew talking

>>106356988
>Null is the only person who truly cares about free speech online you'd think fa/g/s would support him

Your a seething hive of anti-anime anti-child bride christian faggots that are 1/2 women.

Why would "we" support you?
> NOO U r NOt /G/
I've been online longer than 4chan.
Been programming longer than you've been alive dipshit fuck.

"freedom of speech" does not mean banning anyone who disagrees with you.
It means the opposite of that.

Ditchbag (since you love "MUHHH WHOITE WUHHMAN" whores so much) (you even have a section for "your women" on your site)
4chan is an anime website.

I don't like how josh pronounces roblox.

>>106357139
Do I look like "a jew" to you?
What colour are my eyes?
<--------------------
(you won't answer that).

Let me tell you this: douchebag: we are going to find you and kill you for banning us while claiming "free speech". Do you understand me.

We will enforce against you: the things that you claim.

>>106357152
you are brown
please shut the fuck up

>>106357139
Where's my 6 threads, piece of fucking shit?
I only see 2 there.

You fucking faggot fucking piece of fucking lying shit ("free speech"! (I was banned after 1 day of talking to you), also bragged you had "6 threads" on me about 4 years ago.

Where are they?

What colour are my eyes?
<--------------------
(you won't answer that).

>>106357107
When the mechanisms and tools for censorship, which are being put in place, can be easily turned against you in the next election cycle, it is rational to be broadly against censorship.

>>106357183
Do I look "brown" to you?

>>106357198
The frogs eyes in that cartoon are blue.
However our k_w_f_rms guy will claim "the frog is brown", will ignore the question, and claim freedom of speech on k_w_f_rms when confronted with basic anti-feminism and banning the "perpetrator" of said speech.

Joshua Moon now owns kiwi dot st
thats the new website

>>106357200
k_w_f_rms people are not against censorship. They are against anime and oppose YHWH's law.

If they were against censorship I wouldn't have been banned within 1 day of speaking to them.

I wrote positively about Hans Reiser, the brilliant file system programmer.
Responded negatively to them dissing me.
Posted about my opensource project.
etc.

This was too much for them to tolerate.

Free speech is when people say things I like.
Spam is when people say things I don't like.
I learned it from the Free Speech absolutist Elon Musk.

so i guess it is down?

>>106357200
Elections (at least in the US) don't matter whatsoever as both parties are subsidiaries of AIPAC. No matter who is elected, censorship will be in place. This is how you can elect people who just spent a decade whining about "censorship on campus" only to immediately have those same people immediately turn around and start taking actions against colleges and individuals for protests/op-eds they don't like, while also lecturing the British for having their own censorship goals. Nobody actually supports free speech, it is just an argument made by those currently lacking power to try to get those currently wielding power to leave them alone. Or an argument made by those in power to justify bullying those with less power (as is the case with the USA lecturing the British about censorship, while the USA simultaneously has its own censorship regime).

It is just slave morality, and Null grifts off of people who can't understand that. He isn't really unique in this graft, it is the same game with all free speech advocates.

>>106357183
Do I look "brown" to you?
What colour are my veins here
<--------------------------

Your site is a pro-censorship site.
You hate anyone that supports YHWH's law
(Such as: according to you, Richard Matthew Stallman, the Jeremy fellow who is a free software dev) regarding young virgin girls.

It's simply a seething feminist site where you try to "hemm up" or "woodchipper" anyone who does not promote your feminist style of marraige or whatever women do in your christian country.

>>106357229
The "only one person can post per IP" new restriction makes it hard to use now.
Since everone is on like 5 tor addresses.

>>106357274
When were these pictures taken? I found articles on a stupid wiki that were complaining about schizoposts you made in some Linux group in like 2006. Aren't are like 50 now? I have a hard time believing these are you, because you would be way older.

>>106357274
Spiritually brown

>>106356776 (OP)
I hope it is down for good: since they _OPPOSE_ freedom of speech.

They banned me in 1 day of talking to them, engaging with them.
1) Pro-Hans Reiser thread (this is a no-no: he's a SKIZO, don't you know: it's crrraazzzy that the MMALLLEEE of the species would use VIOLENCE against his ENEMIES (look up what male actually means, latin root))
2) Pro-YHWH posts: this is also a no no: No PEDOPHILE GODS ALLOWED ON FREE SPEECH WEBSITE, JJEEEWWWWW, BBROOOWN (note: I have blue eyes, and I burn in the sun, I do not tan at all)
3) Opensource/FreeSoftware project posts: again, this is the 3rd thing I did, angered them

they also have a "rule" against not direct messaging people.
So if someone disses the shit out of you to your face:
you're not "allowed" to /msg them and confront them and ask them where to meet and at what time to kill eachother dead.

They made posts complaining about my private messages to them.

Just like here, were "wallmart employee" demands jannies "perm ban" whomever they dislike here as if they own the place: they were doing the same thing vs me there: "BAN HIM" "DONE".

>>106357309
I've been anti-feminist posting on linux groups since I was 13.

I've been making 3d maps since I was 10 or 11.
I've been programming perl and C since 13.

It's up

>>106357334
You are my favorite internet schizo. Please live to be 100 years old and post in every thread, and make ten threads per hour.

website full of seething bitter retards obsessing over literally who ecelebs

>>106357314
>>>106357274(You)
>Spiritually brown

So white, dipshit. Every white person is a christian. Which is a "brown" religion.

As I said: I burn in the sun. I do not tan at all. There's no melinin to save me from the star.

>>106357348
>You are my favorite internet schizo. Please live to be 100 years old and post in every thread, and make ten threads per hour.

Thanks, but 10 threads shouldn't be a problem on a "top 100 popular website" like 4chan. We used to have more articles per hour on slashdot.

Also I'm not a schizo. People today call anyone who's views they dislike as "schizo". They call Hans Reiser a "schizo" too because he used violence instead of acquiescing to his children being sent to hell in Russia.

Male means the violent one, essentially. The violent animal. Femina is not the male. Yet you all call actual males "schizo" today.
Schizo used to mean hearing voices: not having thoughts.

>>106356776 (OP)
Don't you have some mentally ill minors to harass?
/g/ is not your tech support, fuck off.

>>106357355
>website full of seething bitter retards obsessing over literally who ecelebs
They seem like women to me. Are they women?
I asked them to help with my opensource project.
They did not.

What use are they?
It certainly is not a free speech site.
It's only "free speech" in the christian sence: "if something agrees with the new testament, it is free to be spoken; if it agrees with the old testament; it is not free speech". "No stone woman, dontchaknow. Better a MILLSTONE! JAYYSUS ABROGATED YHWH'S WORD! YHWH is a DEMON!, etc." --K_w_f_rms

>>106357357
A true white person posesses a calm demeanor, they wouldn't be as angry as you are over being called brown.

>>106357397
Maybe they should claim freedom of speech some more while trying to get swat teams to "wood chip" some of those people for quoting the [old testament god] instead of their beloved new testament ["chop off ur dick 4 heaven" feminist faggot]?

i got banned for simply stating facts on kiwifarms
the staff there are very sensitive and ban you for upsetting them. tiktok and 4chan doesn't ban you for stating facts.

>>106357408
>>>106357357(You)
>A true white person posesses a calm demeanor, they wouldn't be as angry as you are over being called brown.

No dipshit, the "true white people" of europe, did not posess a calming demeanor. They were at war for 2000 consecutive years.

They killed their enemies dead.
They were not faggots like you are.
They were not women like you are.
And they didn't know how to read your new testament.

They just killed you if you disrespected them.
That's what swords and rapiers were for.

kiwisisters i would like to redirect your attention to ebussy and gnome foundation again

>>106357403
i am an 18yo christian trad girl with huge boobs and i like to chatter on kiwifarms

>>106357426
>i got banned for simply stating facts on kiwifarms
>the staff there are very sensitive and ban you for upsetting them. tiktok and 4chan doesn't ban you for stating facts.

So did I.
I said Hans Reiser did nothing wrong.
And that I was going to kill those who dissed me to my face putting "DURRR AUTISM" "stickers" on my posts.

Just facts.

>>106357433
watch how fast this thread gets deleted now
anything to cover up the truth behind the gnome foundation

>>106357440
>i am an 18yo christian trad girl with huge boobs and i like to chatter on kiwifarms
Slaves are only allowed women 10 years after their prime.

>>106357433
This years GUADEC was even worse than the year before.
Gnome isn't what it used to be anymore.

>SHE WAS JUST 17 YEARS, 364 DAYS AND 23:59 HOURS OLD CHILD YOU SICK PEDOPHILE
- the most normal kiwitranny

>>106356776 (OP)
stop posting about this retarded website
>hurr lulcowz hahah so le funny
grow the fuck up, it was not funny 20 years ago, it's even worse today as no one but subhumans use the term lolcow anyways

4chan is full of glowniggers and trannies trying to make everyone a pussy

>>106357450
>>106357454
How was Jeremy's talk?
I respect him for DOMINATING little girls since he was 11.
Like an ANIMAL.

Romans would be proud.
What white people call "MMAALLLLEESSS"
Romans called vir (virile).

Even though I don't like rust, and I do like Xlibre.
I also like Jeremy Bicha: the 1 non-gay Navy Man (they kicked him out for this).

Naturally, christians hate him, k_w_f_rms hate him.

>>106357467
>4chan is full of glowniggers and trannies trying to make everyone a pussy
Ah, so real white people, according to the k_w_f_rms faggots.

>>106357464
IMO the retarded website is interesting because of how much effort normies and jews have put in to shut it down. It's a case study in clearnet censorship, and observing the ways in which it continues to stay up is valuable
The actual content of the website is garbage but since cuckflare et al. have made it into a martyr website it's now actually worth watching what happens to it, since they could use the exact same modus operandi on anything else in the future if they so choose

>>106357429
>not a jew
>anti new testament

>>106357472
>How was Jeremy's talk?
He didn't even do a talk. It was a complete nothingburger.
Gnome is dead at this point.
You can't milk a dead cow.

>>106357454
You can't have security on linux without the kernel being secure: that means PaX/Grsec: which we had in 2001, but do NOT have anymore.

Any wayland isolation of windows etc does nothing when the kernel is swiss cheeze. Since none of the 9000 linux copyright holding programmers will sue to actually enforce their copyright against violators such as grsecurity.

>https://perens.com/static/OSS_Spenger_v_Perens/3_17-cv-04002-LB/doc1/pdf/40-2.pdf
>Page 9: Stable Patch Access Agreement.
>That's where the No redistribution terms are.
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/106346638/

GPLv2:
> 4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance.

>6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein. You are not responsible for enforcing compliance by third parties to this License.


Grsecurity Codicil:
>Redistribution
>Notwithstanding these rights and obligations, the User acknowledges that
>redistribution of the provided stable patches or changelogs outside of the explicit
>obligations under the GPL to User's customers will result in termination of access
>to future updates of grsecurity stable patches and changelogs
>

>------------------------


As you can see:
The "rights" are changed from: You can redistribute to non-customers at will, (GPL
To
You must not redistribute to non-customers at will (Codicil)

>so what do you like to do on your free time
>so uhm... I like to go on this website the kiwifarms and follow up on the latest drama of , , and
>who even are those people?
>they are very famous on the internet believe me

>>106357507
There is some schizo here 24/7 spamming jew shit and posting pro-child-rape rants ever since Jeremy Bicha got ousted. He wants to normalize child rape.
He tried multiple times itt to do the good old:
>I can't post videos about toddlers getting raped to death? Then you are not free speech!
An argument that stopped working over ten years ago.

>>106357507
>>>106357429(You)
>>not a jew
>>anti new testament

I'm Irish/Polish/Swiss-German. Indeed: I am not a Jew.
I hate your new testament because it is a feminist slave religion for women and castrated faggots.
It appeals to women with: "NO STONE WOMEN"
It appeals to castrated faggots with: "CHOP OF YOUR DICK FOR HEAVEN (matthew 19, greek)"

It appeals to both with: "BETTER A MILLSTONE, SLAUGHTER PEDOS!!!"
>Hell yeah, slaughter these MAALLEEESSS who opresss us women and faggots who have had their dicks chopped off!!!

YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Infact: young virgin girl children are the only really "allowed" XX to marry often:
you are not permitted to live the white christian life of "serial marraiges" or "dating and dumping": that is adultery.
The first man is the actual Ba'al (it's ba'al in the old testament: master/lord. or as you christians say: DEMON. Not "husssbannnd" (caretaker))
The rest is your blood corruptions.

YHWH allows child brides.
Girls are not true virgins after first blood, rabinically. You will ignore this.

>>106357429
That's a nice speech but you're still brown.

It's up
Why was my thread invaded by schizos, wtf /g/

>>106357544
>>>106357507
>There is some schizo here 24/7 spamming jew shit and posting pro-child-rape rants ever since Jeremy Bicha got ousted. He wants to normalize child rape.
YHWH explicitly allows child brides.
Jeremy Bicha was FUCKING young girls since he was 11 years old.
A very VIRile young lad.
Which is what the ROMANS called men: VIR.

>He tried multiple times itt to do the good old:
>>I can't post videos about toddlers getting raped to death? Then you are not free speech!
No I did not.
I only post anime girls, YHWH"s word, and Rei+City (this one gets you the maddest)

>An argument that stopped working over ten years ago.
If you do not allow us all to marry young virgin girls of our own kind: we are going to end your civilization.

>>106357588
>It's up
>Why was my thread invaded by schizos, wtf /g/

"IF SOMEONE DISAGREES WITH ME THEY ARE SCHIZO!!!"

>>106357588
It's the ruling class making sure people don't get to say or see what they want.
Trannies are their first line of defense.

>>106357254
I'm saying that free speech does not have to be justified by liberal ideals, you can support it for pragmatic reasons. And I've never seen Josh ever make any such idealistic case for it anyway.

>>106357564
>I'm
...a gypsy /int/ reject
https://desuarchive.org/int/search/text/child%20YHWH/

>>106357588
This is the reaction you deserved and MikeeUSA is /g/'s first line defense against normies. He is our schizophrenic guard dog and he shits up threads which don't deserve to exist. I am 110% team MikeeUSA.

>>106357240
I believe you. Kiwitroons are very inane and butthurt and moralfagging people.

>>106357611
And I'm saying the "pragmatic reasons" are largely illusory. Nobody actually supports free speech, they merely debate about where censorship should be applied, and to whom.

>>106357568
>>>106357429(You)
>That's a nice speech but you're still brown.

What colour are the veins in my wrists
<---------------------

>>106357612
>>>106357564(You)
>>I'm
>...a gypsy /int/ reject
>https://desuarchive.org/int/search/text/child%20YHWH/

What colour are these veins
<------------------------

>>106357611
If they get rid of spam, advertising, and unfortunately anything illegal in their country of hosting, then that should be considered freedom of speech.
If they are smart enough to host anonymously outside of the niggercloud, then they don't even need to restrict illegal things.

If you disagree with this then you're a dipshit, and probably a tranny.

>>106357588
He's an automated bot made to distract from, detract from and destroy threads about topics its maker doesn't approve of

>>106357426
There is a serious selection bias on the website. It should be obvious considering the nature of the site, but no one there really acknowledges it. Nearly everything posted there is treated as truth and representative of whatever community or person they are discussing. This leads to extremely skewed and biased theories about everything being discussed. It almost makes sense why they are so hateful, if all they ever are exposed to is the worst presented as the whole.
But the thing is that even if you correct them, they won't listen or will straight up ban you. They are not rational or objective, they get off by projecting that degeneracy they both despite and are fascinated with onto everything. They choose to be disingenuous and act on bad faith. They are not like nerds attacking others to gatekeep and protect their hobbies, they are just like mob of roasties who are obsessed with gossip try to project themselves as morally superior in order to hide their malicious intents.