>>106375528
i did read your post
no need to be an asshole
VB.NET is still viable on Windows, but Microsoft has ceased developing the language and is only providing bugfixes at this point; it seems likely they will drop support for it entirely at some point
VB6 is functionally dead
Gambas, ironically, doesn't have great Windows support; fine if you're permanently on Linux, not so great if you're on Windows or want cross-platform utility
Freebasic is pretty cool, but kinda niche and uses an older BASIC dialect
i'm assuming you're not interested in BASIC retrocomputing, not because you said so, but basically because you decided to be an asshole instead of answering my questions (great work, anon)
if you want to develop something that will work for the next ~10 years and you're on Windows, VB.NET should be fine
otherwise, anon's suggestion to consider an alternative like Python is probably a good one
Python's not going away anytime soon