Thread 106517657

Lol lmao xD even, imagine needing resources when duckduckgo, yandex chatgpt chin-gpt and so on exist.
Just go read something.

Pro-guiness on tap thread, no cans or bottles allowed.

>>106517657 (OP)
Based.

>>106517661
heh

>>106517657 (OP)
i only use sveltekit

>>106518163
show it, censor whatever you need to censor or just yolo it, a pic will do

>>106518126
would

>>106518126
no actual back end though?

>>106518163
Well, are you gonna show us, Anon? The whole class is waiting.

>>106517858
Name 1 (one) advantage of using jQuery in 2025

>>106519183
second, we got people trying to center a div over here
>>106518163
NO PRESSURE
>>106519990
there's no advantage, I don't use it, I won't use it, I don't need it. it's useless. but it defined modern js's first steps
the key is in "second coming", aka do it again jQuery, show us the light, show us which features we were lacking, what is the way forward, and most importantly, purge react and node

>>106520021
* from the FE
did u know jQuery plus som library (just another js added on the html) had full SPA functionality like 15 years ago if not more? ajax helpers, low resources real time animations and so on
the comouters back then were literal toasters, but they could handle a spa, some style animations and so on,, thx to jQuery

>>106520066
>>106519990
>>106520021

just google the computer specs from 15 years ago, normal comouters, and share insight

>>106520021
>there's no advantage, I don't use it, I won't use it, I don't need it. it's useless. but it defined modern js's first steps
>the key is in "second coming", aka do it again jQuery, show us the light, show us which features we were lacking, what is the way forward, and most importantly, purge react and node
I don't think we need jQuery to show us new features. Also React and Node are decent because they just work, but there are alternatives to each (Angular, Vue, Svelte; Deno, Bun)

>website is supposed to be 14kb or less
my font is 4422kb
this is retarded

>>106517657 (OP)
Can't spell Guinness,
>no cans or bottles allowed.
Nitrosurge wants a word.
OP's an imposter.

>>106520138
>Also React and Node are decent because they just work
I too.enjoy the deprecation and vulnerability warnings, having a server, on the front end? brilliant af
who needs basic files when you can have dependency clow cyrcus. I get your point.
Guys, pack it up, react + node for FE is based (lmao)

>>106520167
DAAAAAMN DONAL, BACK AT IT AGAIN WITH THE JEWJEW CUM!

>>106520167
>Nitrosurge
the what? elaborate

>>106520204
>>106520167
>googles it
I definitely wouldn't, I think that's like being overly protestant in the pub

>>106520208
I was a sceptic too until I said fuckit and bought one, it's smooth as christmas, exactly like a pulled pint, none of that gassy shit from regular draft cans or bottles.

>>106520234
look, cans and bottles are not meant to be consumed

>>106520195
>I too.enjoy the deprecation and vulnerability warnings
Yes they are good. They're telling you that you have security problems that need fixing. Other package managers for other languages might not tell you this, so you don't know if your application has security problems in its dependencies.

>>106520244
we didn't have this problem with jQuery, mostly because it didn't have a back end server in the front end
you get a pass because you're saying what the senior was saying, but regardless I press the button
> we need all these packages btw
do we? do we really? do we really need all those packages and node and dooobedooobedaaa? do we really do?

>>106520528
>we didn't have this problem with jQuery, mostly because it didn't have a back end server in the front end
With jQuery you would still need to update it regularly because security issues could potentially arise in jQuery.
>a back end server in the front end
It's not a back-end server, it's Node running so that it can constantly watch and bundle your React app because you're probably using JSX which the browser doesn't understand. So it constantly transpiles your JSX into JS.

You don't need to use that though. You can use React without JSX for example. But why does it bother you to have Node running on your dev machine? Why is that a problem?

It seems what you really have a problem with is the large number of dependencies in a typical React front-end, and maybe in front-ends using other frameworks. Okay well just write vanilla JS then. Today's vanilla JS is very powerful.

>>106521000
you know you know more than me, I'll let you be, but careful with that package though

>>106518312
>>106519183
>>106520021
https://projectdream.neocities.org/

>>106521199
I'm not going to read all that text, but I really like it you mentioned comodores or some shit, that shit's cool

>>106521000
>Okay well just write vanilla JS then. Today's vanilla JS is very powerful.
you're going to do that for me anon?
it's ok you can write react it's fine, we need devs after all

>>106517657 (OP)
>be localization company
>break words in half

we eating good today
https://youtu.be/9xzqqZMXjjg

>>106517657 (OP)
deadliest warriors were hillarious.

imagine being so terminally online that you make websites.

>>106521374
I'm just saying you can choose what you want. And the choices available today are much better than jQuery in my view.

>>106522574
Web devs can make good money. Pic related.

If were are developing the web does that make us spiders?

>>106523455
The web is more like a spoke hub now

what do I use to host images for a website with user generated content

>>106524228
FBI should have a good list for you

>>106524261
?

>>106524228
I know the answer to this question but if I tell you then you might beat me in the job market

>>106524502
don't worry I'm never getting a job

>>106524228
I got u. Start a discord server and never invite anyone. Set up a node.js program that uses the discord api to simply upload everything to your discord chat and keep track of the message id for simple retrieval