Anonymous
6/13/2025, 6:04:18 PM No.17761301
Why did the perception of what a race even is shift so dramatically in the XXth Century? Beforehand most people saw race as a heritage of common descendance from a single person or a group of person participating in the same ethnohistorical event - like how the Old Testament call all races and tribes by the name of their progenitor.
Nowadays however "race" as contentious as it is, is used exclusively for vague genetic markings no sane man would ever try to ascribe to a genealogical tree - when it's not used purely to describe a single skin color. What the fuck caused that shift? Why is the old vision of race essentially buried six feet under when it's a perfectly valid way to interpret heritage through a ethnohistoric lense?
Nowadays however "race" as contentious as it is, is used exclusively for vague genetic markings no sane man would ever try to ascribe to a genealogical tree - when it's not used purely to describe a single skin color. What the fuck caused that shift? Why is the old vision of race essentially buried six feet under when it's a perfectly valid way to interpret heritage through a ethnohistoric lense?
Replies: