Does barring people from good education keep then uneducated?

>>17768727 (OP)
>b-b-b-but <they> hurt me when <I> go to >>>/pol/
>the thread

not /his/

>>17768727 (OP)
Not in the age of the internet

Beyond a certain point education funding has virtually zero effect. If you have paper, pencils, a paper sharpener and access to books and internet, you can basically learn anything if you set your mind to it. It is just a case of getting over that human tendency of not caring about anything you are under no peer pressure to achieve.

pencil sharpener*

>>17769299
>Cato institute
Really bad starting point to get your talking points from.

>you can basically learn anything if you set your mind to it.
People still want teachers and classrooms. Online education is mostly ass, having no teacher/mentor or having ass srudetn teacher ratios is horrible for both of them.

>>17769299
Even then you need a teacher/mentor to guide you along the process and make sure you don’t waste your time on useless/outdated material.

Not everybody is going to do a Malcom X and educate themselves to a respectable level.

>>17769272
Wrong. The internet gives you unfettered access to information, and also to mindless distractions. Given the choice between mastering a difficult subject of study or masturbating to pornography, the slope-brained average man will opt for the latter.

>>17769860
In other words the internet cancels itself out as a useful asset to humanity

There are no excuses in today's technology based society, to be uneducated.

>>17769738
Check which public schools in the US receive the highest funding per pupil. Then check their performance.

>>17769860
post nut clarity is the best moment to learn about important things, too bad the bitch wants to cuddle instead