Thread 18100100

We need an antidote to this superstitious nonsense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNZEG08BT4o

The reason Christians hate Jews is because Jews are a constant reminder of how ridiculous their belief system is.

> Adam and Eve were an androgyne.
>Their bodies were covered in fingernails.
>It did not take billions of years to create the world. Only a second.
>Science is totally whack lmao.

>>18100100 (OP)
Talmudic brainrot. Not in scripture.

>>18100100 (OP)
"Why don't they convert to Christianity if Jesus was so obviously their prophesied Messiah?" some of them ask. Others (more biblically literate ones) realize that it's because the Jews read the Old Testament and know just how easy it is to debunk Christianity.

>Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near: So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.
Mark 13:28-30

>Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Matthew 16:28

>And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.
Deuteronomy 18:21-22

Here we have Acts 3:22-23 directly quoting Deuteronomy 18 and the chapter literally tells the reader that Jesus was nothing but a failed apocalyptic preacher. If every Christian read the Old Testament (most haven't even read the Gospels) there'd be hardly any Christians.

>>18100119
/thread
Jesus still making jews cope and seethe after 2k years.

>>18100132
>Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When her branch is yet tender, and putteth forth leaves, ye know that summer is near: So ye in like manner, when ye shall see these things come to pass, know that it is nigh, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things be done.

The only timetable given is "this generation" which doesn't mean the people alive back then, and we know this from what's said in the very same speech: "And the gospel must first be published among all nations. " (Mark 13:10)

That alone (the time it would have taken back then) makes it impossible for "generation" to mean anything but the state of unbelief and rebellion the jews would continue to be in until the end times, which are indeed approaching.

>Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Fulfilled right away in Matthew 17 when 3 of His disciples witnessed His transfiguration.

>And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.

Correct:

"And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. " (Matthew 24:1-2)

>>18100183
>The only timetable given is "this generation" which doesn't mean the people alive back then
It does.
>That alone (the time it would have taken back then) makes it impossible
No, it just shows Jesus was wrong about yet another thing.
>Fulfilled right away in Matthew 17 when 3 of His disciples witnessed His transfiguration.
So that was the Second Coming?
>Correct:
Yeah not like the temple hadn't been destroyed before or anything lol

>>18100100 (OP)
You will never have a pagan society, Timmy.

>>18100206
>So that was the Second Coming?
How? He had not even left at that point. This was a sample of it for them to witness.

>Yeah not like the temple hadn't been destroyed before or anything lol
Pretty sure the pharisees were not counting on it happening again considering how they got their panties in bunch over the idea.

>>18100231
>How? He had not even left at that point. This was a sample of it for them to witness.
Then why are you saying that was the Son of man coming in his kingdom?
>Pretty sure the pharisees were not counting on it happening again considering how they got their panties in bunch over the idea.
John 11:48 states otherwise

>>18100176
Their sages are literal 65iq pedo animals. Look at this shit:

"It turns out that three generations were born in twenty-four years, and that each and every parent begot a child at the age of eight."

Why is a man who engaged in intercourse with a three-year-old girl who was married to another man liable to receive the death penalty?

https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.69b.1?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en

>>18100132
Jesus Christ came as a King: Matthew 21:1-43
Jesus Christ affirmed he is the Son of Man: Matthew 26:57-65
Jesus Christ explained he was working through the Father’s Will: John 10:22-38
Jesus Christ spoke about the Truth and his Preexistence: John 8:31-59

>>18100100 (OP)
>Adam and Eve were an androgyne.
No Scriptural basis
>Their bodies were covered in fingernails.
No Scriptural basis and goes against Genesis 2:7; at worst, Adam looked like dirt or clay, and Eve likewise, as she was made from his body.
>It did not take billions of years to create the world. Only a second.
Genesis 2:4 :
>These are the *GENERATIONS* (Hebrew : toledot, PLURAL FORM, meaning "generations, history"; the lineage of Adam until Shem is listed in a document of the same name in Genesis 5) of the heavens and the earth when they were created.
Can the rabbis explain how multiple generations of Heavens and Earth happened in a single second?

>>18100292
Forgot to fulfill this one apparently

23So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time.

24“But in those days, following that distress,

“ ‘the sun will be darkened,

and the moon will not give its light;

25the stars will fall from the sky,

and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’ c

26“At that time people will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. 27And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens.

>>18100238
>Then why are you saying that was the Son of man coming in his kingdom?
Where did I say that? The claim is that some of them would get to see it, and that's exactly what happens in the transfiguration mount. You are assuming He meant the kingdom would come back then, which indeed would have, had they repented.

>John 11:48 states otherwise
It doesn't. That's talking about the relative political autonomy they enjoyed.

>>18100327
>some of them would get to see it
See what exactly? A glimpse of a prophecy he would never fulfill?
>That's talking about the relative political autonomy they enjoyed.
And the loss of the temple.

>>18100100 (OP)
Jews know Jesus was the messiah because in retrospect they were scattered, their temple was destroyed, and the body of Christ was enthroned in dominion over them.

That's why they created Talmud jew religion, which is not old covenant Judaism, and its purpose is to destroy all who are of God but themselves. They do this so that although they were not identified to be the whole of Israel, by murdering Christ they think they'll inherit His kingdom.

Evil, truely evil and sick people is what jews are.

>>18100323
That happens at His second coming, which's yet in the future.

>>18100345
Mark 13 is all Jesus telling people to watch for signs like the destruction of the temple because doomsday was imminent not more 2000 years in the future. There's a whole cope about two more weeks in 2 Peter 3 because people had already realized back then that it wasn't ever happening.

>>18100100 (OP)
Why did rabbi yeshua enjoy cruising with teenage boys in public gardens? Why was this schizo tranny jew such a faggot?

>>18100337
>See what exactly?
Jesus in His glorified form, which He has in the kingdom.

>A glimpse of a prophecy he would never fulfill?
That's your wishful thinking. He will indeed fulfill it after the tribulation as He did all the other prophecies at the appointed time.

>And the loss of the temple.
Your assumption. No mention of the temple whatsoever. They were already under the roman rule. The full takeover would have been political, and the temple probably used for something else rather than destroyed.

>>18100372
>dude still waiting for the fulfillment of prophecy that was supposed to be fulfilled in the 1st century talking about wishful thinking
Lmao
>Jesus in His glorified form, which He has in the kingdom.
Which that generation didn't get to witness like he prophesied.
>No mention of the temple whatsoever
Didn't you just quote Matthew 24? What is the "holy place" he's talking about?

>>18100359
>>18100183

>>18100402
>>18100206

Holy shit guys I feel like the heavenly bodies are being shaken for real this time turn on CNN

>>18100391
>dude still waiting for the fulfillment of prophecy that was supposed to be fulfilled in the 1st century talking about wishful thinking
"Supposed" according to your wishful thinking.

>Which that generation didn't get to witness like he prophesied.
Again, He never said the kingdom absolutely was coming right away; that's your assumption and indeed it's wrong given the fact that He said the gospel had to be preached around the world first. The mount of transfiguration events happened to fulfill the prophecy that some of them would get to see it, and that's what 3 of them indeed saw.

>Didn't you just quote Matthew 24? What is the "holy place" he's talking about?
You can cool it with the sophistry already. It ain't working.

You quoted: "If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation. " (John 11:48)

And there's no mention of anything being destroyed, let alone the temple. That, again, would have meant a political takeover leaving them without power or autonomy.

>>18100441
Nvm just had to fart

>>18100447
>>18100323

>>18100447
>and take away both our place and nation. " (John 11:48)
>“So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— (Matthew 24:15 )
What is their place, anon?

>>18100454
Again, sophistry ain't doing nothing for you today. Let's recap:

You said: "Yeah not like the temple hadn't been destroyed before or anything lol"

I said: "Pretty sure the pharisees were not counting on it happening again considering how they got their panties in bunch over the idea"

You said: "John 11:48 states otherwise"

I said: "It doesn't. That's talking about the relative political autonomy they enjoyed."

You said: "And the loss of the temple."

I said: "Your assumption. No mention of the temple whatsoever. They were already under the roman rule. The full takeover would have been political, and the temple probably used for something else rather than destroyed."

You said: "Didn't you just quote Matthew 24? What is the "holy place" he's talking about?"

I said: "You can cool it with the sophistry already. It ain't working.

You quoted: "If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation. " (John 11:48)

And there's no mention of anything being destroyed, let alone the temple. That, again, would have meant a political takeover leaving them without power or autonomy."

And now you're suddenly talking about Jesus and what He said about the temple as if that somehow magically causes the totally unrelated verse John 11:48, which you quoted, to imply the destruction of the temple?

Retarded and dishonest.

>>18100488
>I said: "Your assumption. No mention of the temple whatsoever.
>And there's no mention of anything being destroyed, let alone the temple.
You should call people retarded and dishonest when you're so bad at pilpuling, anon.

>>18100488
btw
>totally unrelated verse
https://biblehub.com/john/11-48.htm#crossref

>>18100498
Sorry, not working. John 11:48 does not imply the pharisees thought the temple would be destroyed. That's something Jesus prophesied and it was indeed fulfilled.

>>18100119
Talmud = tradition

It's like if you reject all Christian tradition and accept only the New Testament, not knowing that it was compiled and that the Catholic Church approved of the book, but that it also has an extra-biblical tradition.

The Talmud is a continuation.

>>18100509
You have already realized their "place" is the temple, that's why you silently dropped the claim that there's no mention of it. Very unintelligent and disingenuous.

Also, are you ready to read Acts 2?

>>18100503
Unrelated to Jesus' prophecy concerning the destruction of the temple, not unrelated to other verses that cover the pharisees scheming againt God to keep their dirty game going.

>>18100536
>Unrelated to Jesus' prophecy concerning the destruction of the temple
Matthew 24:15 is there for shits and giggles then?

>>18100517
>not knowing that it was compiled and that the Catholic Church
It wasn't. The canon was discerned and believed across many churches both comtemporary and much older than catholicism. Early catholics played a role like others did, but they did not dictate anything. It was God directing it all along as He promised He would.

Also catholicism and the jews' religion (as Paul calls it) self-appoint a wicked elite who claims God gave them permission to contradict Him, and make up a bunch of demonic garbage out of thin air that cause people to march straight into hell just to retain power. Truly 2 sides of the same coin.

>>18100543
Correct. No relation.

>>18100566
lmao

>>18100520
*crickets*

>>18100342
/thread
OP unmasked and btfo

>>18100630
>We can ruin the ancient pure bloodline of an Aryan child by convincing him or her of the altruism of begetting interracial children
So by converting them to Christianity?

>>18100520
"If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation. " (John 11:48)

I didn't even talk about what "place" may actually mean here, which could easily be their political power structure/status and relative autonomy. I said specifically that even if you read in "temple" here (which's reasonable given it's part of the nation), it's not talking about a physical destruction thereof, which makes no sense given it could have been taken over and used for something else, as often happened in antiquity.

Bottom line, the pharisees had no idea what was coming.

>>18100649
>which could easily be their political power structure/status and relative autonomy
Nope.

>>18100653
>I said nope therefore reality btfod

>>18100648
Non whites weren't even considered people until about 100 years ago, and that too is a crime which can be rightly attributed to the work of Jews.

>>18100656
>could easily be
>reality
Kek

>>18100659
Well yeah all the early Christians were Jews.

>>18100648
Yes.

>>18100706
>>18100670
Race blind jew worship is not "christianity" and never will be. Call that what it is, noahidism.

>>18100713
Christianity transcends race, there's no Nigerian nor Norwegian we're all children of God.

This very important verse I coul not remember but now I do:

"When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. " (Acts 1:6-7)

Anybody saying Jesus implied the kinddom was determined to happen immediately, specially in light of what He says about the preaching of the gospel to the world as a prerequisite, is disregarding the reality that it depended on the Father's will according to the state of repentance of Israel collectively. The Messiah was rejected twice and the kingdom was thus postponed.

>>18100713
>Race blind jew worship
That's actually a perfect description of Christianity.

>>18100725
>>18100520
Keep reading.

>>18100731
You need to be more specific. What exactly is your point?

>>18100741
>In the last days

>>18100744
He's quoting Joel, and those verses have multiple applications (not as in different purposes but as in addressing the same events at different times) just like those covering the day of the Lord (a generic term for the day of judgment), which has happened twice already and will happen yet a final third time.

>>18100769
He's quoting Joel to tell them that the prophecy is being fulfilled. Pentecost was God pouring out his spirit on them, which means it's the last days.

>>18100784
Because it was being fulfilled, but some of the events prophesied by Joel already happened during the first day of the Lord, some were happening back then (which led to the destruction of the second temple) and some will happen again for the third. That's the whole point. The application is correct even if he did not understand the timing.

>>18100839
Those last days sure are lasting.

>>18100855
"Day of the LORD" and "Last days" both cover specific chains of events spread across 3 distinct time periods in history and are ultimately identified by the defilement of a temple standing in Jerusalem. How can this be so hard to wrap one's head around?

>>18100869
>spread across
No? All of that shit was supposed to happen following the Siege of Jerusalem and the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. These "prophecies in installments" only exist in the headcanon of coping Christians who can't accept that the prophecies were supposed to be fulfilled back then but weren't.

>>18100719
>>18100726
>christianity is when you commit suicide by miscegenation and worship Christ killers

you dropped this

>>18100894
Not at all.

"But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. " (Revelation 11:2)

That was written roughly a quarter of a century after the destruction of the second temple in 70 AD. It's a pattern and it's destined to happen again.

>>18100903
Christians are the best goylems bar none.

>>18100922
Call that what it is, noahidism.

>>18100928
Christianity is the foundation of Noahidism.

>>18100931
>Christianity


>the foundation of Noahidism.

>>18100904
>It's a pattern and it's destined to happen again.
In two more weeks when they build a third temple and it's destroyed again? Or is it about the temple that had just been destroyed?

>>18100941
Paul explains it, check out Romans 11.

>>18100945
There will be a third temple at some point (the pieces are already finished and ready to be stacked into place), but they're waiting for the man of sin to show up and strike the peace deal that will allow this.

>>18100959
Won't make Jesus come back though.

>>18100964
He's coming back because it's written He will, not specifically because of a temple that's bound to be defiled and destroyed, though these events signal His return is close. Jews, however, do believe the man of sin (who they'll mistake for the Messiah) shows up to build the temple.

>>18100972
>though these events signal His return is close
They did. In the 1st century. Dude just didn't return like he promised, because he wasn't actually the Son of God but a delusional Jew.

>>18100975
Fake news, not what scripture says.

>>18100978
Scripture IS fake news.

>>18100948
>romans 11 says to commit suicide by miscegenation and worship christ killers

>>18101075
That's about Noahidism, the Jews are still the chosen people. Wild olive shoots are lumped together in Romans 2.

They got psyopped into thinking they would go to hell if they don't grovel to a magic rabbi

>>18101105
Do you even feel bad at all about lying? I realize that the Talmud instructs you to lie in order to destroy, but do you not even at all believe that you do wrong by telling lies? Appealing here to whatever shred of humanity there may be in you still.

>>18101137
>religion of peace and love

>>18101141
>religion of peace and love
It has never been that, and nobody who claims it should be is telling the truth.

>>18100517
Like half of Christianity doesn't even accept tradition as a valid source of belief. Protestants.

>>18101141
>religion of peace and love
It has never been that, and anybody that claims it should be is not speaking truth.

>>18101144
>Be harmless as doves

>Be suffering servants

>Do not resist evil

>Forgive every time

>Carry your cross

NOOOOO THOSE WERE ALL METAPHORS AND WE SHOULD GENOCIDE EVERYONE WHO DOESNT BOW DOWN TO JEWISH CENTRAL BANKING

>>18101137
Lying about what?

>But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. God “will repay each person according to what they have done.” To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For God does not show favoritism.

Translation: First for my cultivated olive branches, then for you filthy wild olive shoots. No favoritism or anything

>>18101162
Within the context the advice is good, how to be within the bounds of the kingdom of heaven, ruled over by those who form the body of Christ. Nowhere does it say they should allow themselves to be destroyed, and in fact it says to destroy all who will not submit to their rule. For it was for their salvation from death that God gave them his Son, and surely you would not think that God would condemn any who ensures they have their eternal life.

This is in fact how it was understood for over a thousand years, and playing pretend like modern noahidism is christianity is nothing but a disgusting lie.

>>18101163
There is no hierarchy in Christ, the jew is not ranked above anyone else that is born of the Spirit. In fact, the jew which does not hail the Lord is a poison because they sow only evil wherever they go.

>>18101179
>There is no hierarchy in Christ, the jew is not ranked above anyone else that is born of the Spirit
Then why the Jew first and only then the goyim?

>>18101192
Any jew which does not comprehend the salvation in Christ is more worthy of scorn than a non jew who does not at first perceive the Truth. The jew should know better, and they only bring shame upon themselves when they do not hail as Lord the Son.

Jews never were the whole of the tree, and that fact is the point of contention over which some pharisees killed him. So it is said that he went to the cross to demonstrate his love for all of his people, because he would rather let his own people destroy his body than forsake those that are the lost sheep and the wild branches.

Furthermore, the tree being the body of Christ and those that are in Christ, those like jews who have not hailed the Son as their Lord are cut off from God and forfeit their inheritance.

>>18101204
Everything you said is wrong.

>>18101179
No verse supports your violent ethnonationalist nonsense

"He who loses their life will save it"

"Your kingdom is not of this world"

>>18101216
God is the root, and everything I have said is the Truth. I have said not to boast, that in Christ the jew is not ranked above (or below) anyone else that is born of the Spirit.

>>18101217
>"Your kingdom is not of this world"
The kingdom is formed of those that are born of the Spirit, not of this world, but which proceeded from the Father. All which is of God upon the earth is them and they form that kingdom which is of Heaven and it has one Lord, the Son and ruled by the body of Christ.

You will willingly lose your life, give it all up, if you have perceived the Path.

>>18101226
>Backpedals

I accept your defeat

>>18101222
>God is the root
It's the patriarchs. Imagine only reading the KJV because it's the version your baptist cult worships and being unable to understand what it says.

>>18101229
Where in that was any backpedal? I revealed to you the meaning of the Truth, and you can now be righteously destroyed in the rising fire if you do not exercise discernment by perceiving the path of salvation.

>>18101231
It is God, all which is of God upon the earth is from God and it is God who is the root and the wellspring which is their nourishment.

>>18101234
>immediately threatens hell even though his position is nonsensical

I have judeochristian fatigue

>>18101239
What makes you think I was referring to hell, I assure you that I was not and some after life fantasy is not what you should fear.

>>18101236
You're gonna hurt yourself doing so much mental gymnastics

>>18101244
Worshipping the patriarchs in place of God is quintessentially jewish, and if you seek THE patriarch then you know already which one lies at the beginning of it (double meaning pun intended).

>>18101204
I like that pic.

>>18100323
He's telling people who would be long dead to be on their guard lol

Also Paul was under the impression that he and his churches would get raptured

>>18101336
Yeah they were really convinced that doomsday was just around the corner. Paul even advised people to stay single and not start families because the world was about to end anyway and it was better to focus on God and shit.

Wtf, did Michael dip into this thread? Crazy shit happened here.

>>18100119
True. Scripture is:
>Adam and Eve were identical twins of opposite sex.
>Their bodies were literally made of dirt.
>It did not take billions of years to create the world. Only 6 days.
>Science is totally whack lmao.

>>18100100 (OP)
>mistake
No it was very successful Jewish psyops

>>18100100 (OP)
>jews
are retarded cultists and will never win
1000+ expulsions and they still haven't learned their lesson

>>18102526
when will we learn our lesson tho
they can't get all those expulsions without having been invited in as many times

>>18102959
Jews will always exist as long as men seek justifications for their evil ways. In jew religion, by worshiping their devil, they believe themselves to be justified in any evil they design. That is why although all original jews are destroyed, the synagogue of Satan always has a fresh stream of converts.

>>18102966
That's a TRVKE the world is not yet ready to receive
I remember a great philosopher once said "Every country has the jews it deserves" or something similar

>>18102959
I am of the same line as the other anon that replied
Christendom must purify itself so the jews don't profit off vice and wickedness
they're like leeches that feed off a weak body weakening it even more. If the body regains its strength it can remove the leeches

>>18103001
read and learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism

>>18100100 (OP)
Hello rabbi

>>18103062
>replies to the Bible with a wikipedia link
Lmao

>>18103300
there is a lot of Bible in that link my j*wish friend
that's why I said read and learn
but picrel is from the Bible. Let's see you pilpul your way out of this one

>>18103390
>Let's see you pilpul your way out of this one
Paul did it all by himself lol

>>18103419
>takes the bait
>but pilpul inadequate
Does Paul abrogate Jesus in your deranged mind?
Supersessionism is NT compliant therefore unchangeable until the end of times
your 'ideology' is nothing but a passing fad like the French sojourn or the saeculum obscurum

>>18103519
>"i-it was bait!" *immediately switches to another writer after Paul refutes his unbiblical doctrine*
Oh no no no

>>18103558
>Jesus Christ
>another writer
I'm sorry moshi but as a Christian should I not take Christ's Word above anything else?
How did (you) prove supersessionism wrong when you don't even know what it is and you call Christ 'another writer'?
What exactly did Christ publish since you claim He was a writer?
The good news is (dispensationalism) is dying off as it deserves and will be soon cosigned to the dustbin of history along with the deranged ideology that spawned it.
The better news is you are unqualified for this debate and should scurry back to your rat tunnel to reflect on what just happened.

>>18103582
>starts with Paul
>doesn't work
>"s-should I not take Christ's Word above anything else?"
>plays dumb about John being the aforementioned writer
Kek, based retard. Good thing you stopped trying to post Bible verses because you're utterly incapable of comprehending what these books say.

>>18103613
>he thinks he's the root
>not the branch that was cast aside
real talk schlomo. You are not of Christ as per your own talmud, which I will not post
What I said about supersessionism is 100% true and verifiable. It goes back 2000 years and has been supported by all Christian authorities
your crypto-jew well poisoning scofield bullshit is just a flash in the pan and thank God dying off among young Evangelicals
and how's picrel for a Bible verse?
now back to the tunnel

>>18103678
Jesus called you a dog btw

Don't be so noisy at your master's table

>>18103678
>not a single scofield verse posted itt
>all that strawmanning just to admit that the Jews are the branches
Holy shit

>>18103705
>disingenuous rat pretends not to know its own talmud
>continues to post verses without understanding any of them
>thinks Paul overrides Christ somehow which does not even make sense
>'w-we wuz the root goy'
Beyond pathetic even for a jew
stop this nonsense
you have nothing to do with Christianity
Not after what you have written and done
Maybe Kariates and Samaritans I will recognize as legitimate, but not your talmudic brood

>>18103686
be quiet behenchod fecaloid
indians should not speak of things they do not understand

>>18103705
and Paul is waiting for (you) to be regrafted btw
any news on that?

This entire thread is a steady reminder that the world would objectively be better off without all Abrahamic religions, and 'confrontations' like these are like fights between a burglar and a pedophile

>>18103974
>>thinks Paul overrides Christ somehow
I thought St. Paul was Alpha and Omega Based??? How can he override THE Alpha and Omega?

>>18103977
I can't, I'm just another goy like you. If I were grafted in it'd be just to make his chosen ones jealous.

>>18104674
>kvetching pilpul does not realize how stupid he is
Alpha and Omega based is not the same as Alpha and Omega
Do you even read the Gospel fellow 'Gentile'?
And are you allowed to denounce the talmud?

>>18100100 (OP)
No. No we don't. You can't just grasp at meaning from out of the void, you must invert it.

>>18100100 (OP)
Rabbi Yeshua liked to take in the ass from teenage boys in cruising sessions at public gardens btw, it's all in the Jewble

>>18104680
>Alpha and Omega based is not the same as Alpha and Omega
But you're implying they disagree with each other...why else woud Paul have to 'override' Jesus?
>Do you even read the Gospel fellow 'Gentile'? And are you allowed to denounce the talmud?
Of course. In fact, I'm allowed to denounce both the talmud AND the torah, because I don't worship their god of genital mutilation.

>>18104838
>but you're implying
Wrong. (you) implied it and I played along to show you how stupid you are by using Paul to contradict Jesus Himself
also your smarmy "another writer" that I called you out for and you pretended it was about John (yeah right)
And (you) have not addressed the wickedness and blasphemies in the talmud
Now you're coping and pretending to be a gaytheist when a few posts earlier (you) were kvetching about 'double Covenant' (lmao)
We good now or do I need to humiliate your retarded pilpul further?
As for genital mutilation, it's your people who push it, not Christians. Paul was clear on the issue, you would know that if you were an actual Christian and not a filthy kike

>>18104856
>(you) implied it and I played along to show you how stupid you are by using Paul to contradict Jesus Himself
It was the other way around, actually. You tried to use Jesus to contradict Paul when I replied to your 1 Thessalonians quote with Romans 11 in >>18103419, where Paul says the Jews are still the chosen people despite being enemies because God's gifts and his calling are irrevocable. By doing so you're implicitly saying that Jesus disagreed with Paul, which is why I asked you how could the former have to override the latter. That's when you realized Paul, the All-Based, wouldn't be of any help, and had to resort to Johaninne literature instead (so desperately you didn't even realize until I pointed it out and thought I was calling Jesus the writer of John's gospel lol).
>As for genital mutilation, it's your people who push it
No, I'm pretty sure it's your holy jew god who pushes it in your holy jew book.

>>18105077
>where Paul says the Jews are still the chosen people despite being enemies because God's gifts and his calling are irrevocable.
>but I'm not a jew bro trust me
wrong talmudist
it does not apply to (you)
unless you get baptized and 'regrafted' as your favorite Apostle says
>Johannite literature
So that's what you hellspawn call the Gospel of John?
Good to know. And I was quoting Jesus, as was John. You're the one grasping because you don't accept the Truth.
goodbye and good luck with all your lies
>muh circumcision
yandex this: "the trouble started when we tried to publish our study"
and you'll see your tribe's paws all over it

>>18100517
>Talmud
That's a medieval invention.

>>18100517
your 'continuation' is some blasphemous degenerate drivel invented by Sassanids
whatever you do, do not associate your eruv line kapparot bullshit to anything Christian

>>18105898
it's worse than that
it's a Persian invention

>>18100100 (OP)
48:20 wtf did he just admit Jews control the world