Thread 7683347

>shitty art
>still looks somewhat appealing
How does one achieve this sorcery?

>>7683347 (OP)
Give an example

Heavy stylization plus a well designed character with a good color palette

>>7683592
It gets worse when you find out who shills her the hardest.

because it isnt shitty art

>>7683347 (OP)
I keep seeing this character, who is the artist?

thats one of my fave art styles, i love mistakes in art, gives off the feeling that the artist drew it just for the love of drawing.

i love it when art is badly drawn but well animated too, that cant be beat.

>>7683347 (OP)
>How does one achieve this sorcery?
Just make your character fuckable

>>7683347 (OP)
There's nothing shit about this art the fuck are you on about?

If it's appealing then it's not shitty. Cry about it pussies.

>>7683347 (OP)
....it looks good.

>>7683347 (OP)
listen here you are fag, I am sick and tired of us not being able to JUST HAVE FUN

>>7683347 (OP)
Some people are just concentrating a more simple style and get very good at it. Then you can add details with lineweight and color.

>>7683704
some /v/irgin

>>7683347 (OP)
i love seeing shity artist who only look at art from the surface level and thier messure art quality though fidelity and pixel count . the amount of thought and skill and experience that goes into a "shitty art" made by a good artist is something new artist cannot imagine . thigns like apealign artstyle , good subjects , pixel perfecty anatomy, pinpoint shading values .
go pick up pen and practice some more

>>7683347 (OP)
It's just stylized.
...study comics and cartoons I guess?

>>7683347 (OP)
is this appealing?

>>7683347 (OP)
That’s how i feel about this franchise. The creator’s art is beg/int level and yet there’s a degree of knowledge of fundies that shoe through even if he can’t execute them. I don’t know what it is about the style but when I play the game it becomes very endearing and enjoyable.

>>7683347 (OP)

I wouldn't classify your image as objectively shitty, but I think that when someone creates art and enjoys it, even stuff that lacks technical skill can have creative appeal (see pic related).

Even kids' drawings can be good examples imo

>>7683347 (OP)
>>shitty art
Can you provide any examples first?

>>7694002
Nope. This has the line confidence and artistic intent of a 5 year old.

>>7694033
it has sovl. and in the sea of indieslop about le mental health, depresshun and surrealism, something like a grimdark fantasy game with lore enough to hook you up while not being a loredump feels nice and refreshing.

>>7694033
>I don’t know what it is about the style but when I play the game it becomes very endearing and enjoyable.

Likewise. I like the /beg/ nature of the first game it's heavy impasto like brush strokes really gives it a sense of style. The second game ... I'm not much of a fan of the style.

There was a Jreg video (I think it was his second channel where he's pretentious about 'art') where he talks about this person who makes music and how he enjoyed his early works, when he was figuring out how to make the things he want to but when he learned the fundamentals of what he was doing the music was generic- like everyone else's. The charm is in the imperfections of the art when it comes to this one. OP's example seems more like the artist is using crude tools to make okay art.

>>7683347 (OP)
>shitty art
>still looks somewhat appealing
My art has been described like that. I'm highly aware I'm dogshit but some anons found it kind of interesting :P.

https://www.deviantart.com/mithrithnogg

It's what happens when you never studied the fundies but tried making art anyway xD.

What makes this artstyle so appealing that it gets lots of replies within minutes?
>>>/v/718314569

>>7683347 (OP)
that's not shit though? a simple art style does not equal shit art nor does it necessarily mean skill issue.

nice artstyle OP,
ya have some more arts?

>spend hours drawing something
>feel pretty good about it
>see a drawing with way fewer lines and way less colors
>is still 1000% better than my drawing

>>7698082
Just because you spent lot of time on something doesn't make it good. In artistic expression and presentation less is more. Draw more pics with less hassle for bigger impact.

>>7683347 (OP)
Literally just porn and obvious sexual innuendos.

There is no freedom, if I draw big titty lady I get likes. If I draw something I'm genuinely interested in like a landscape it gets 0 attention.

>>7683347 (OP)
She needs more porn.

>>7695036
This rapes anything I've ever drawn

>2017 was 8 years ago
Dang. Anyways, here's something I painted back when Shin Godzilla was the big thing and I was still a low-int. I think "shitty art" that has soul can really only come from artists that have high confidence and low skill. That's not necessarily a bad thing, either. They're untrained in a lot of areas, but they also care enough to finish whatever piece they're working on because it's their art. They're at the very peak of the skill curve before they realize just how much of a beg they really are, so they haven't quite reached that mindset of pros that hate their work, but they're also not begs that are asking questions that a simple Google search could answer.

>>7699488
Very nice anon

>>7683347 (OP)
>appealing
>engaging
>apparently if it's not superior in the technical sense it's shitty
Anon...

>>7694136
does this count as a hetauma?

>>7683347 (OP)
Thats just heavily stylized but you can tell the person that drew it has a pretty good understanding of the fundamentals, so I wouldnt label it as "shitty art".

>>7705585
I love it

>>7705893
thank you!
going to redraw it digitally later...