>>214087562
No, because I can go look at what they found and how they arived at their conclusions. If I knew what I'm looking at or what methods they used I could try it myself to see if my conclusions are different. Are you suggesting that we should all assume anything you don't personally know for a literal fact (as opposed to an assumption of fact) is untrue? No, you're suggesting that if we at some point must rely on trusting the word of another person, how is it not different than the bible et. al. But I told you how it's different