>>63851407 (OP)>or it's a false problemCross-eye dominance is a real thing, and it is a 'nerf' so to say, but it's not absolutely critical and ruinous either.
For just regular hunting, regular sport shooting, self-defense, combat in a military setting, etc, you're gonna (presumably) have practiced and gotten used to it and you're gonna do fine, you can even become a quite good marksman in spite of cross-eye dominance, as long as you practice and apply yourself. All the same fundamentals remain the same.
Cross-eye dominance starts becoming a bit of trouble at higher levels of competitive sport shooting, where every little bit starts adding up and counting, because you're competing with a lot of people who are really fucking good at this thing.
This can still be helped, which, if you saw some of that Olympic footage a while back, is why you saw some of those guys wearing those things which cover one of their eyes, being their dominant eye, so that their non-dominant eye can focus on the task at hand. This is allowed at high level competition. Some people instead choose to learn to shoot with their other hand, which is doable, but more work.
So, the short of it is that cross-eye dominance is really not a good thing by any metric, but it's not a catastrophe either, you can deal with and adapt to it.
>>63852629>You should be shooting with both eyes open no matter what.Ideally, and especially in a combat situation, but if you're not ever expecting that you might end up in a combat shooting situation, it's less important. It's fine to close one eye while taking aim at an eminently edible deer, you're not gonna get flanked by another deer with an AK.