>>63886314
>>63886428
>>63886481
lol I wasn't in the last thread and have no idea who's linking to my posts. My final statement on the matter was open ended
>>63880546
>>63880556
To my eyes, it looks like the Geissele groups better. If that's the case, might be because
1. The G$ taper is superior to BCM's pencil
2. The BCM chamber seal is inferior [they fail .223 no-go gauge tests]
3. BCM's renowned QC lets damaged crowns pass
4. Radial marks visible throughout bore in spite of chrome plating suggests the CHF barrels are being rifled with worn mandrels
BCM still technically meets the mil spec of 2 MOA, but that's pathetic IMO when the competition does better for around the same price during sales