>>28583536
Seems good, looks like you saved me a trip to the garage.
Yeah, 46/1000 seems very low. There's a culprit of "privately owned", some additional amount was technically owned by the state, but that wouldn't be enough to raise that number to a 100
>>28583494
>While discussing
Well, yes. My argument was, it isn't really necessary to own a car when your city is built walkable and with proper public transport, so even today a car's role is reserved to what I described. Well +luxury, and roadtrips I guess but those aren't fun when you have to dodge potholes and imbeciles on a two lane road
>The families were not that big especially in the cities
Two sets of grandparents, parents, 1-4 kids. 7-10 people total, not including parents siblings
>Soviets didn't even have personal vehicles capable of seating a lot of people
Well there are RAF-110, but why would one need to move a lot of people at once? Every scenario I can imagine is covered either by public transport or by a cargo taxi
>privileged
My ass. The numbers don't lie-we had barely more cars than rsfsr despite having ZAZ, LuAZ, 5 car assembling plants, 10+ car repair plants (that in practice were assembling cars too), and that's not counting plants that were making trucks and buses. If anyone was privileged it's the Caucasus republics
