>>508493085i have never done a serious drug, for me God was an intellectual idea, im trying to prove a person made the world, and that worlds like this one can't happen naturally, as it is too unlikely.
the reason being unlikely matters, is because even if you had infinite budget of chance in an infinite multiverse, simpler universes that contain life are more common than complex ones, and if all that is being selected for is conscious experience, then we should expect to be the simplest conscious observer that can possibly exist, as it is far more unlikely to not be that.
We (and our universe) is, of course, the farthest thing from the simplest most common kind of observer universe, meaning it would be absurd to think we are actually in that multiverse. It would be like thinking we are in the world where a man got 10 royal flushes in a row, instead of thinking we are in the world where he is cheating. Even in a multiverse, there are far more worlds where he is cheating than where he is telling the truth.
For example, imagine a world where every square inch of space if perfect for life, and so is full of conscious observers; or you can imagine a mostly broken world, that just so happens to form a physical brain like thing for some moments enough to cause a single conscious observation, before breaking again. Given the share number of broken universes compared to orderly ones, this would probably comprise an absolute majority of all life anywhere in a multiverse, so why aren't we one of these observers? A well balanced world is the exact opposite of what we should expect to see come about by chance; So so much for not needing miracles, you need a miracle of chance just as much as we need a miracle of God.
Atheists rely on cope theories to fill gaps in their knowledge every bit as much as christians do, everyone uses temporary explanations until they find the real answer. This isn't some idiot superstition, there's legitimate reason to suppose God exists.
