>>514956716
>So are you agnostic
Agnostic atheist. As I still lack belief
>These are the only two options to me.
It's more nuanced to me as agnostic and gnostic ate branches in both theism and atheism

>>512966957
>The existence of God isn’t a personal feeling or opinion
100% it is.
>>512966957
>it’s the objective truth about the fundamental nature of reality.
To you

>>512966962
>the claim that atheism is merely "disbelief or lack of belief in gods" suffers from a superficiality that fails to engage with its deeper epistemic and metaphysical commitments
Atheism doesn't have epistemic or metaphysical commitments

>>512966962
>atheism is not a passive absence but an active rejection of theism's central claims
It's both. Which breaks down into agnostic atheism and gnostic atheism, see pic

>>512544416
Again
>>512544311
>There are agnostic and gnostic atheist. Agnostic and gnostic are branches in both theism and atheism.

>>511999075
>This also means that claiming God isn’t real, being a double negation, while stating it’s a lack of belief, is actually a statement of faith in the lack of faith.
You don't account for agnostic or gnostic atheism

>>510646842
I agnostic atheist bud and what am I lying about?

>>509645941
>There are 2 types of Atheist
Agnostic and gnostic

>>508524288
>or agnostic theists.
Yup. Gnostic and agnostic are branches in both atheism and theism

>>508240733
>I literally highlighted these things you absolute moron
Nome of it refutes anything I've said
>>508240733
>You think atheism is the active denial of God(s)
That would be gnostic atheism
>>508240733
>and not merely a psychological state wherein you "lack belief"?
That would be agnostic atheist

See, my 1 dimensional friend. Gnostic and agnostic are branches in both atheism and theism

Now I'll sit back and watch you not understand this

>>508120284
>It literally is you retard

>>507650494
>"convinced atheists"