>>508611711 (OP)Other thread 404d so I'll just dump this here because it's lulzy and related.
>>508623076>once they hit the sex marketIt's not strictly a sex market and they hit it at like 4 years old. Why do you think everybody wants to be a little girl?
The only reason cunny does not control everything is that they do not exercise their power - which however is entirely natural even in adults: to voters or consumers realize their power? In short: no. This then leads to all sorts of problems, as power is appropriated from the ones who possess but don't exercise it, notably by jews.
What is true is that this power diminishes with age, first during sexual maturation, and then as their sexual viability gradually declines. Worth noting: in principle this is centered on procreation (producing more cunny), not sex. Hell, nobody cares your dick felt good.
While I cannot say for certain it's definitely possible this is all evolutionary: cunny on a pedestral. Until fairly recent times the number of cunny and viable females you could maintain was the main metric of your tribes long term success.
Even males being more combative and physically strong fits perfectly into these scheme beyond a mere "men hunt, women forage/babysit" concept.
>it's a copeTo deal with the overwhelming power of cunny and take the cunny for yourself; men were in effect forced to compensate somehow, which also led to them elevating themselves above women, and enhanced a certain division of the sexes.
In primitive human terms a 25 year old female already is rather old (and a mother of 7 [of whom half died tho]), which makes the premium on cunny even greater.
Consider the stigma on men attacking women.
>technically the power advantage is reserved for use against other men onlyMeaning it's not an actual check on cunny-power.