Thread 520193600

Sirs, how to access files in the cloud

N

I

>>520193600 (OP)
What about spacex scam? I doubt they have the capacity for the good morning bullshit.

Holy based!

>>520193600 (OP)
A rando Indian dude thinking this isn't as embarrassing as a U.S. Presidential candidate from a major parting thinking the exact same thing.

>>520193600 (OP)
Kamala Harris's caste

>>520193600 (OP)
To live in the mind of a child... It must truly be a wonderful thing. Imagine being a full grown man WHO WORKS IN TECH and you save something to the cloud and just wink at the sky.

>2025
>still not knowing the internet is tubes
NGMI

wait they are actually cables? i thought it was like wifi but more powerful

>>520193600 (OP)
These are the people that Microsoft is firing white people for

>>520193916
no it's actual magical fairies that carry your saved data back and forth to and from The Land Beyond Time

>>520193916
Nigger what? Does every building in the world have a satellite dish or a cable for the Internet you actual fucking retard. Their is a cable going to your house right now you fucking moron

>>520194039
>>520194052
wifi can send your data by the air
I also have internet on my phone and no cables

>>520194115
just stop posting man, you're making it worse

>>520194115
And your Wi-Fi router is connected to a cable you dumb faggot...

>>520194150
>>520194199
you dont need any of that you also have internet on airplanes and no cable running to the ground

>>520194115
If we were using wireless to transmit all of the cable data we would run out of bandwidth and end up "jamming" ourselves at like 3% capacity of that 99%.

Portuguese anon is right. They could also just use something like starlink too

>>520194274
yeah when you're on a plane you're actually flying through a bunch of people's saved data

>>520194356
hey dipshit, what do you think the starlink links to? I'll give you a hint: there are fucking cables involved

>>520193698
G

>>520194426
no there aren't the starlinks beam the data in space, the data is not even in the cloud but higher in space where there are no clouds

>>520194347
>>520194274
scratch that, not even 1% of the data could be transferred wirelessly.

You'd be better off making a physical copy and mailing it.

>Total usable radio spectrum (from ~30 MHz to ~300 GHz) is about ~270 GHz wide, but only a fraction is allocated for data.

>If each 5G link uses ~1 GHz of bandwidth, you’d need 25 THz of spectrum (!) — 100× more than all available radio spectrum on Earth.

>So no, it’s not physically possible to transmit all that cable data wirelessly through Earth’s atmosphere — even ignoring issues of interference, distance, and directionality.

>>520194274
Kek sorry you are correct

>>520194538
>the data is not even in the cloud but higher in space where there are no clouds
alright, I can't argue with that

>>520194199
This dipshit might actually be only using wireless and/or satellite.

>>520194115
Hey dipshit, where do you think these magical waves come from? A transmitting dish maybe? And these are connected to .. ..
>don't say you think they are connected to air

>>520194426
There are no cables involved with starlink. They use radio waves and lasers to transmit data. The only cables involved are the pre existing ones on earth to connect to the World Wide Web. You could easily get rid of all cables and replace them with lasers that beam the data across the earth, that’s literally just what fiber optic is except the light goes through a glass tube.

>>520194719
No he is just actually good at trolling... The greatest of the lost arts

>>520194115
Saaaaar

>>520194724
Kek I'll bite... Why do they put the laser inside a fiber optic CABLE?

>>520194724
>There are no cables involved with starlink.
>The only cables involved
shut up, just shut the fuck up

>>520194440
G

>>520194805
Indeed, his understanding of English (probably a second language too) is that of an adolescent but his understanding of science is that of a toddler.

He also deliberately switches to nigh babytalk when trying to explain his scientific hypotheses.

>>520194440
G

>>520194115
MY BROTHER IN CHRIST CMON

>>520193600 (OP)
>J is the new N
I'LL START;
>
J

>>520194996
E

>>520194545
The fact that we will be calling it the radio waves long after radio doesn't exist is entertaining. It's like calling iron swordrock

>>520194805
>No he is just actually good at trolling
Sorry, don't have time to sort twiggers out, I'm just going to have to file him under "retard".

>>520195074
E

>>520193885
Saaar he is stupid lower caste. Saaar I am smart higher caste

>>520195082
>comes from the Latin word radius, meaning "ray" or "beam of light"

The problem comes from the radio receiver being a misnomer.

>>520194995
You understand trolls aren't real right? Like that is the joke.

>>520195209
Yes the thing I said.

>>520193885
>>520195205
SAARS I HAVE JAGGANAATH POINTS

>>520194922
You’re retarded. There are no cables involved with starlink. The only reason it uses cables is because it’s forced to so that it can use the internet which was built on cables. You could easily make your own starlink network that uses no cables at all.
>>520194911
There is no difference between using fiber optic cable and just beaming the laser directly. In this video they connect two buildings using a laser and a dish. It can be done and you can make a cableless internet https://youtu.be/e9P_R-ApD-g

There is literally a company that sells products designed to let you beam data across buildings. Anyone who thinks it can’t be done is retarded

https://uisp.com/wireless/airfiber

>>520195541
>There are no cables involved with starlink. The only reason it uses cables
it's time to stop

>>520193916
>>520194115
>>520194274
>>520194538
Thank you for giving us this brief feel and nostalgia of what 4chan used to be like in 2010s, playing dumb and levels of sarcasm that most don't even get, have my upvote good sir

>>520195149
R

>>520196124
Yeah starlink itself doesn’t need cables you fucking retard. It is FORCED to use cables to connect to the rest of the internet which is built on cables. You can easily make your own private starlink network separate from the already banished internet that doesn’t use a single cable

>>520195082
Point taken, but radio waves are a category defined by wavelength/frequency, like gamma waves, microwaves, etc, so it's unlikely that it will be renamed. Now, telegraph, that's a word not used much (aside from the verb form).

>>520196311
>it doesn't use any cables, except for all the cables it uses
go drool quietly in the corner

>>520195541
What is diffusion...? Why do they put it in a cable?

>>520196311
>banished
Established*
>>520196420
You are genuinely retard beyond belief. Starlink doesn’t need cables, they’re forced to use it because they live in a cable based society. If starlink wanted to split off from the internet and make their own cableless network they could do it

>>520196430
Fiber optic cables also lose signal and are required to go through repeaters or amplifiers. You can still do it and it has been done

>>520195541
Lasers lose cohesion over distance. Fiberoptic cables retain cohesion over distance. Lasers are subject to atmospheric aberration whilst FO cables are negligible.

Lightbeaming technology or optical communication is EXTREMELY limited by weather and other line of sight issues.

That being said optical works outside the atmosphere and from high-atmosphere to space. But within the atmosphere it has a very short range. On the order of hundreds of meters to ~8 kilometers depending on the atmospheric conditions.

>>520196311
>no cables
Such a thing *could* be built, but not now. And not for the reasons you think. We don't have that technology yet. It would require transmission of all data from all terminals/sources (there are other things besides cell phones) to a data center/transmitter. We aren't there yet. And physical limitations require frequent retransmission to prevent data corruption.

And, frankly, I don't want such a thing. All these radio- and microwaves permeating everything have done something to people. I've seen the longlong ago and people weren't as stupid as now.

>fucking cell phones have ruined a generation

>>520195205
I have phd in comp science and maths (pure mathematics)

>>520193600 (OP)
This is the result of OOP and it’s consequences

>>520197033
Prove 1+2=3

>>520194115
10/10

This is like the ending to Escape from LA when Snake Plissken hits the entire US with EMP waves to reset the entire country

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tro-o0fOk4

>>520196731
Right so now we both know you are being a disingenuous faggot. We use cables for a reason

>>520197132
It's already proved.

>>520194052
>>520194150
>>520194347
>>520194719
>>520194805
reddit bullshit, it's a valid question. you know how it works so why would you be the one asking the question? mongs

>>520194199
>wifi can send your data by the air

>>520197312
Yaar pajeet, consider playing sudoku

>>520197348
Ok. What is the valid question?

>>520197629
Over short distances with limited bandwidth correct parminder good job

>>520194362
underrated

>>520198036
they didn't know all internet comes from cables and that "cloud" is a dishonest term implying it's all wifi or satellite, like starlink. You insult them for asking this and not knowing this already thereby keeping the scam going. You work in IT so you know it actually means server farms where you store data remotely, most people do not work in IT you fucking nerds.

Well if Starlink launches some in-orbit data centers, we could get rid of those ocean cables

have laser communication between satellites and in orbit data centers, its basically like fiber optics without the cable

all the satellites would be lasering each other all day it would look pretty cool from space

>jeets think "the cloud" is actually in clouds
I want to believe they believe that

>>520198429
Kek Im a photographer you stupid nigger and this isn't secret mysterious hidden knowledge people are just fucking stupid. Not knowing how things work and just assuming retard tier bullshit is shameful. People should feel bad for being fucking dumb. Isn't the sky Internet isn't a valid question

>timmicels are still using cables
lmao get good

>>520198868
normies and boomer they sell it to also believe this. they use that word because they know they will think something that. not "My Basement filled with your private data computing".

>>520193916
not cable, but tubes filled with glass

>>520194362
kek

>>520193916
it's mostly IP tunneling over homing pigeon migration patterns..

this guy needs to get his head out of the cloud

>>520194724
What the fuck do you think links the starlink constellation to the rest of the internet you twat?

>>520193600 (OP)
>Nothing is through air?
HAHAHAHAHA

>>520199535
How about you read the rest of my posts, you stupid faggot? I’ve talked about that like 10 times now.

>>520193600 (OP)
Based terrorists

>>520199662
Kek all that does is confirm you are retarded.... Being wrong more isn't something to brag about

>>520193838
she was great

>>520193600 (OP)
SAAAAR WE GLUE AWS CLOUD TOGETHER WITH SHIT AND PISS
VERY GOOD PHYSICAL TRANSMISSION AND PROTECTS AGAINST VIRUSES THAT VISHNU GURU SHITHIMSELFI ENLIGHTENED US ABOUT

>>520193600 (OP)
Boomer-level logic thinking cloud meant it was in the air.

>>520193600 (OP)
There are people, who think the cloud is an actualy cloud and not servers somewhere connected by wires??

>cable free since 2003
Sometimes I forget retards can type, it reminds me of parrots speaking. Do they actually understand or is it mimicry?

>>520201280
Indians, who are also probably the ones running Microsoft right now going off of the state of Windows

>>520201280
Yes, and those people are in this thread.

>>520193600 (OP)
lmao bet that jeet is ceo on some IT company

This board is brain dead. You're all literally 90IQ. KYS all of you

>>520202515
>SAAAARS

>>520193600 (OP)
Wait, so do the tech CEOs actually think it's all stored in a literal cumulo-nimbus? Thunderstorms are just mass data transfers?

>>520193916
Yes my on the outside looking in friend. It turns out if you want to reliably move massive amounts of data across the ocean you need fairly thick, like an inch or more, optical fiber cables. Not fairy magic that lifts it up to the spirit of the sky.

>>520194985
E

>>520195541
Sure, but there's a big difference between linus techtip doing this between buildings in some port coquitlam industrial park and a large scale system that can reliably move all of the world's data. What kind of unshielded laser do you plan on using?
What do you do in the case of environmental factors that bend and warp the fields that the light is to move through?
>Sorry South America, no internet today, it's just too humid

>>520202914
>he hasn't installed power over Ethernet cables.

>>520197033
Thats crazy. Yet you still end up spending your time here?

>>520202914
What do you think lightening is? You know the phenomenon when clouds produce thunder and flashes of lights? It's when a lot of gooners are cooming and it requires a lot of data to stream all those X vids

>>520193600 (OP)
Everyone knows that all of our data is stored in clouds. When it rains, this is actually just everyone downloading my the data. And when the rain gets into the earth and feeds the flowers and trees and animals, all of these contain our data as well and can transmit this data locally on earth. This synergistic effect of data in the clouds and all life on earth creates a giant cloud that encompasses all of existence and allows us to transmit data to any point in time.

>>520206260
That makes sense

>>520193600 (OP)
typical IT jeet

>>520193600 (OP)
SUPERIOR BHARAT IT EXPERTISE SAARS

>>520193600 (OP)
wow streetshitters are retarded. this poo probably has a “degree” in computer science too.

>>520205366
>Yet you still end up spending your time here?
Really? You think wage life is better? Don't count /polers among normies.

>>520210678
These people have internet.

>>520210678
X is a toy

>>520193600 (OP)
The amount of people that think "the cloud" is a physical object is terrifying
There are so many fucking retards in the world
It's almost too much to handle sometimes, maybe even a lot of the time