>>213388001
>QOTD
Outstanding question of the day. I thought about it while showering, and I believe it could have something to do with how the respective medias are consumed.
Most people don't really take audio fidelity into consideration, since high end audio equipment is out of reach for the average consumer. They simply enjoy their tunes with low end consumer equipment that would not benefit from high fidelity audio files. That's not to say niche high end stuff like DSD, electrostatic headphones, or some autistic platter spinners aren't a market, but they're for a marginal group of ballers.
Cinema on the other hand is experienced on the same equipment by everyone sitting in a given audience. Most consumers can afford a movie ticket every once in a while and enjoy a memorable high fidelity experience. It's beneficial to more consumers for a film to be designed with high fidelity in mind. Everyone gets the same experience more or less, so the bar is set pretty high.
This of course is not taking film streaming into consideration, but let me make my own rules to make my argument more valid.
Does this make any sense? I'm still a bit cranky from being woken up by loud noises.

Fifteen select Japanese filmmakers and how likely they used the hard-R in private, ranked from least likely to most likely.
>Yasujiro Ozu
>Kon Ichikawa
>Akira Kurosawa
>Masaki Kobayashi
>Yoshishige Yoshida
>Keisuke Kinoshita
>Toshio Matsumoto
>Kenji Mizoguchi
>Takeshi Kitano
>Mikio Naruse
>Shohei Imamura
>Nagisa Oshima
>Sion Sono
>Seijun Suzuki
>Nobuhiko Obayashi
Source: a study I've done
>>212970494
THE HATED CHINEEEEEEEEE
SMOKE OOOPIUM

>>212408254
>QOTD
Full uncut version of Soldier Blue (1970)

>>211372860
You want every user or any board seeing /film/ on the list of boards? Your wish has a fatal flaw.