Search Results
7/6/2025, 9:04:09 AM
6/15/2025, 1:51:54 AM
>>712677268
the problem with ahsoka "dying" is that there are no concequences for it for her
>dies on mortis
>everyone forgets about it by the end, her dying there is never brought up again
>dies to vader
>actually she didnt die, she time travelled just as vader was about to cut her down, she is not injured
>dies to baylan
>actually she didnt die, she time travelled (AGAIN) just as she was about to fall onto some rocks after being knocked off a cliff
palpatine dies, and he's left crippled in his own clone body
ventress dies and she's scarred from the experience and has to pay a price to come back
the problem with ahsoka "dying" is that there are no concequences for it for her
>dies on mortis
>everyone forgets about it by the end, her dying there is never brought up again
>dies to vader
>actually she didnt die, she time travelled just as vader was about to cut her down, she is not injured
>dies to baylan
>actually she didnt die, she time travelled (AGAIN) just as she was about to fall onto some rocks after being knocked off a cliff
palpatine dies, and he's left crippled in his own clone body
ventress dies and she's scarred from the experience and has to pay a price to come back
6/13/2025, 12:49:12 PM
>"[thing] wasnt set up previously and therefor its bad!"
>"actually [thing] was described in this sourcebook and this novel, both canon, but I dont blame you for skipping the novel"
>proceeds to double down because he cant admit hes wrong
a quick wookieepedia search would tell him this, hell even a google AI overview could be pretty accurate
I just hate these fans who have only watched whats on screen and act like they know everything about star wars lore, and cant admit when written material proves them wrong
its what, willful ignorance? a book would prove them wrong so they just avoid all the books so they believe themselves to be right
>"actually [thing] was described in this sourcebook and this novel, both canon, but I dont blame you for skipping the novel"
>proceeds to double down because he cant admit hes wrong
a quick wookieepedia search would tell him this, hell even a google AI overview could be pretty accurate
I just hate these fans who have only watched whats on screen and act like they know everything about star wars lore, and cant admit when written material proves them wrong
its what, willful ignorance? a book would prove them wrong so they just avoid all the books so they believe themselves to be right
6/13/2025, 12:46:29 PM
>"[thing] wasnt set up previously and therefor its bad!"
>"actually [thing] was described in this sourcebook and this novel, both canon, but I dont blame you for skipping the novel"
>proceeds to double down because he cant admit hes wrong
a quick wookieepedia search would tell him this, hell even a google AI overview could be pretty accurate
I just hate these fans who have only watched whats on screen and act like they know everything about star wars lore, and cant admit when written material proves them wrong
its what, willful ignorance? a book would prove them wrong so they just avoid all the books to they believe themselves to he right
>"actually [thing] was described in this sourcebook and this novel, both canon, but I dont blame you for skipping the novel"
>proceeds to double down because he cant admit hes wrong
a quick wookieepedia search would tell him this, hell even a google AI overview could be pretty accurate
I just hate these fans who have only watched whats on screen and act like they know everything about star wars lore, and cant admit when written material proves them wrong
its what, willful ignorance? a book would prove them wrong so they just avoid all the books to they believe themselves to he right
Page 1