Search Results
ID: phdSyZJC/biz/60553310#60561632
6/29/2025, 8:59:25 PM
Yes. There are several ways to make it in the game dev world:
1) Make a porn game that doesn't look like shit (Art focus)
2) Be innovative and make an addicting phone/indie game (Creative focus)
3) Be talented and make a dynamic game in some way (Engineer focus)
4) Slow crawl your way to fame by herding a following based on previous game releases (Long game)
5) Get really lucky making a viral game (Short game)
1,3,4 Require time.
2,5 Require experience in the industry.
You need to love making games which can initially be a massive timesink. Do it in your spare time after work.
t. 6 figs indiedev (multiple successes)
1) Make a porn game that doesn't look like shit (Art focus)
2) Be innovative and make an addicting phone/indie game (Creative focus)
3) Be talented and make a dynamic game in some way (Engineer focus)
4) Slow crawl your way to fame by herding a following based on previous game releases (Long game)
5) Get really lucky making a viral game (Short game)
1,3,4 Require time.
2,5 Require experience in the industry.
You need to love making games which can initially be a massive timesink. Do it in your spare time after work.
t. 6 figs indiedev (multiple successes)
6/29/2025, 3:52:54 PM
>>40213302
I've thought about this considerably and I think unless you can provide a viable alternative to same-sex practice, it's cruel and inhumane and "setting someone up to fail." I was encouraged to read on the subject by pastors and Bible study leaders etc. growing up, as they could not offer a solution; I read a lot of "ex-gay" and "yeah I'm same-sex attracted but I can't act on it because that's wrong" books and the common theme was that these people were abjectly miserable, barely alive, despite having faith. In Autobiography of an Androgyne the author just, breaks and winds up sucking a billion cocks because it's too much to bear. I repressed for several years because "same-sex practice is wrong" and it was miserable and didn't draw me closer to God.
I'm under no illusions--by transitioning and pursuing straight men, that's still 'same-sex practice' in the eyes of God. But what else am I to do? No writings, religious authorities, conversations with other Christians have yielded anything but "be miserable all your life I guess," which simply is not practical. It leads to desire curdling up and becoming even uglier, manifesting in weird ways. I think someone like me fucking [his/her?] husband as a "pressure relief valve," larping at normalcy, is the "best" and most viable solution, "harm reduction."
I'm always open to alternatives, provided they're feasible, they just never arise.
I've thought about this considerably and I think unless you can provide a viable alternative to same-sex practice, it's cruel and inhumane and "setting someone up to fail." I was encouraged to read on the subject by pastors and Bible study leaders etc. growing up, as they could not offer a solution; I read a lot of "ex-gay" and "yeah I'm same-sex attracted but I can't act on it because that's wrong" books and the common theme was that these people were abjectly miserable, barely alive, despite having faith. In Autobiography of an Androgyne the author just, breaks and winds up sucking a billion cocks because it's too much to bear. I repressed for several years because "same-sex practice is wrong" and it was miserable and didn't draw me closer to God.
I'm under no illusions--by transitioning and pursuing straight men, that's still 'same-sex practice' in the eyes of God. But what else am I to do? No writings, religious authorities, conversations with other Christians have yielded anything but "be miserable all your life I guess," which simply is not practical. It leads to desire curdling up and becoming even uglier, manifesting in weird ways. I think someone like me fucking [his/her?] husband as a "pressure relief valve," larping at normalcy, is the "best" and most viable solution, "harm reduction."
I'm always open to alternatives, provided they're feasible, they just never arise.
6/14/2025, 5:04:09 AM
People play pokemon for the collectible monsters. It's the defining iconic feature of the series. The most centered aspect of every main series pokemon game are the battles involving the pokemon, and the pokedex. This is what 99% of players spend the vast majority of their time focusing on. Therefore these pokemon being the heart and soul of the series are what people attribute to defining a game being "2D" or "3D". The 2D era was when the pokemon in the battles were drawn using 2D sprites. The 3D era was when the pokemon in the battles took a decline from sprites and became rendered as 3D models. Nobody ever cared about a cutscene or a tree or building in the overworld. So yes, Gen 1-5 are the 2D era, and gen 6+ are the 3D era (pbuh).
6/13/2025, 8:58:21 AM
>>527250060
The only thing that decides whether something is genuine or not is the perception of the observer, how can you differentiate between fake and genuine if the fake is equal or even better than the original? there is value in the fake being able to reach that level of perfection.
The only thing that decides whether something is genuine or not is the perception of the observer, how can you differentiate between fake and genuine if the fake is equal or even better than the original? there is value in the fake being able to reach that level of perfection.
Page 1