Search Results
7/18/2025, 8:52:44 PM
>>17850587
>>17852074
Here's what he would've actually said if he wasn't a nordicist we wuzer:
>the Etruscans were similar to Western Mediterranean populations such as Iberians, North Italians and South French
>we can't really say anything about the Latins since there are only six samples and two of them are mixed
>>17852074
Here's what he would've actually said if he wasn't a nordicist we wuzer:
>the Etruscans were similar to Western Mediterranean populations such as Iberians, North Italians and South French
>we can't really say anything about the Latins since there are only six samples and two of them are mixed
7/12/2025, 3:02:06 AM
>>17834059
The Romans were pic related. East Med admixture is male biased. They were conquerors, not slaves. Cry about it.
The Romans were pic related. East Med admixture is male biased. They were conquerors, not slaves. Cry about it.
7/2/2025, 7:25:14 PM
>>17809293
>>17809298
Sorry, they're already dating the formation of the "Imperial cluster" to 200BC, before Rome even touched any area of the Middle East. Also these Latins are from 700-600BC. This could've very well been the genetic profile of the actual founders of Rome.
>>17809298
Sorry, they're already dating the formation of the "Imperial cluster" to 200BC, before Rome even touched any area of the Middle East. Also these Latins are from 700-600BC. This could've very well been the genetic profile of the actual founders of Rome.
6/26/2025, 7:13:53 PM
>>17792965
>Literally the same cope as nordicist.
It's not. We really need more samples. Both the Latins and the Republican period are under-studied. The Romans themselves said they were Trojan-mixes and there are actual Latins (2/6) with Trojan (Anatolian) ancestry. You think that's just coincidence?
>Literally the same cope as nordicist.
It's not. We really need more samples. Both the Latins and the Republican period are under-studied. The Romans themselves said they were Trojan-mixes and there are actual Latins (2/6) with Trojan (Anatolian) ancestry. You think that's just coincidence?
6/12/2025, 12:33:14 AM
>>17755512
Why are you still clinging to irrelevant Iron Age mudhutters? The real founders of Rome obviously had Greek/Anatolian admixture. Bell Beakers were not capable of civilization on their own.
Why are you still clinging to irrelevant Iron Age mudhutters? The real founders of Rome obviously had Greek/Anatolian admixture. Bell Beakers were not capable of civilization on their own.
Page 1