The atheist response to this as usual is to disingenuously equivocate beliefs that people died for with witness/experience based beliefs (WEBB) that Christians died for.
Both are martyrdom but you obviously can't use the former as if it's the same as the later.
It's a classic case of the fallacy of equivocation.

The atheist response to this as usual is to disingenuously equivocate beliefs that people died for with witness/experience based beliefs (WEBB) that Christians died for.
Both are martyrdom but you obviously can't use the former as if it's the same as the later.
It's a classic case of the fallacy of equivocation.

>>17911428
Mohammed and his followers were overtly stated to be incentivized by gains, I don't know how it even comes into your to compare its growth with Christianity's as if they are even in the same ballpark.
>martyrs
With the dubious exception of Muhammed, there isn't a single followers of his who even had supernatural experience, much less something to die for.
Christians died for their witness-based beliefs, again, how are they even in the same ballpark?
Isn't this just a classic case of the fallacy of equivocation?