Search Results
7/10/2025, 5:53:43 PM
>>105859610
I'm no /gd/ fag, but when it comes to product or aesthetic design a lot of it is based off "vibes" when it comes to value or how supposedly good something is. Most styles happen organically and are referred to as a particular style posthumously, but modern design styles have become known for originating from specific studios with multiple artists contributing to a shared aesthetic which then becomes branded. That is why Bauhaus and MCM became so big and lorded over, the studios behind them were big, had many artists working under them and had the connections to show and advertise their product designs (very much like the guild art workshops of old).
A lot of people don't realize that, soas result you get people like this guy who does not actually understand why specific designs or aesthetics are so expensive, yet try to emulate it
He is trying to make his product show some kind of wide stretching design philosophy or fundamental theme when there is none. He may not understand that, or he may think it does, but all he is actually doing is copying the sterotypical marketing of modern design without any of the substance behind it or understanding why. To sound like a sterotypical art critic: it's derivative and shallow. His language is another red flag because of how comically verbose it all is. It is absurd. You can simplify 80 percent of his product descriptions and have them retain the exact same statement. But again he is trying to be designer brain so of course all descriptions about designs have to be over complicated. It's really fucking weird to look at as it is almost the perfect example of someone grifting with modern art...yet I can't tell whether he is actually serious or not.
But I suppose if he is making money that's on the dumb dumbs buying his stuff to begin with which I can't really fault. But still, he could tone it down a bit the level of pretentious over fucking keyboards.
I'm no /gd/ fag, but when it comes to product or aesthetic design a lot of it is based off "vibes" when it comes to value or how supposedly good something is. Most styles happen organically and are referred to as a particular style posthumously, but modern design styles have become known for originating from specific studios with multiple artists contributing to a shared aesthetic which then becomes branded. That is why Bauhaus and MCM became so big and lorded over, the studios behind them were big, had many artists working under them and had the connections to show and advertise their product designs (very much like the guild art workshops of old).
A lot of people don't realize that, soas result you get people like this guy who does not actually understand why specific designs or aesthetics are so expensive, yet try to emulate it
He is trying to make his product show some kind of wide stretching design philosophy or fundamental theme when there is none. He may not understand that, or he may think it does, but all he is actually doing is copying the sterotypical marketing of modern design without any of the substance behind it or understanding why. To sound like a sterotypical art critic: it's derivative and shallow. His language is another red flag because of how comically verbose it all is. It is absurd. You can simplify 80 percent of his product descriptions and have them retain the exact same statement. But again he is trying to be designer brain so of course all descriptions about designs have to be over complicated. It's really fucking weird to look at as it is almost the perfect example of someone grifting with modern art...yet I can't tell whether he is actually serious or not.
But I suppose if he is making money that's on the dumb dumbs buying his stuff to begin with which I can't really fault. But still, he could tone it down a bit the level of pretentious over fucking keyboards.
7/7/2025, 1:47:34 PM
Why do people who like Jax seek to justify his behavior and are not just accepting that he is an asshole and embrace it?
7/2/2025, 6:03:40 PM
>>5010663
>misses the fucking point again
Humans shitting in the street is not compareble to animals shitting in the street, you knuckle dragging retard. Making the argument that by me saying you should not over engineer a ridiculous system for an animal to shit in your own home is the same as me saying that you should not be able to shit in your own home using plumbing is fucking moronic.
>misses the fucking point again
Humans shitting in the street is not compareble to animals shitting in the street, you knuckle dragging retard. Making the argument that by me saying you should not over engineer a ridiculous system for an animal to shit in your own home is the same as me saying that you should not be able to shit in your own home using plumbing is fucking moronic.
Page 1