Search Results
6/26/2025, 10:55:26 PM
>>40609090
The circle of the stage also mimics another circle — the spotlight. Its limits are surrounded by darkness. We prefer to search for the keys we lost where there is light, even if we didn't lost them there. We can point to things that we see in the world around us. That's the luxury of naming that journalism is made out of. But that appearance of objectivity comes at the cost of ignoring and denying that which is dark and obscure, and instead pointing at a particular picture. Look at it, under the light of a lamp. It is beautiful, we've been told. It is so and so. We clap. Curtains.
The circle of the stage also mimics another circle — the spotlight. Its limits are surrounded by darkness. We prefer to search for the keys we lost where there is light, even if we didn't lost them there. We can point to things that we see in the world around us. That's the luxury of naming that journalism is made out of. But that appearance of objectivity comes at the cost of ignoring and denying that which is dark and obscure, and instead pointing at a particular picture. Look at it, under the light of a lamp. It is beautiful, we've been told. It is so and so. We clap. Curtains.
6/16/2025, 2:05:07 PM
>>40541591
The point I'm trying to make is this: they don't have total control over this thing. You kind of have to release it to the world, so to speak, and once you do it reversing the damage done could be imposible if it doesn't exactly what you wanted. If that is the case, they would try to use it to do something stupid and not very important at all, like creating from nothing an obscure figure of 80s british entertainment, and present it to some openminded (to the point of schizophrenia) anons on the Internet, while winking. See if someone can see something. See if someone can archive something. Watch what happens in general. Maybe there's a way of pulling the plug if everything goes South. Maybe not: in that case, people would be scratching their heads, but not really concerned. The concerning shit comes later (if this is true, I must emphasize that).
I actually believe somethimg much more sinister, that I dare not say.
Spook!
Slither!
The point I'm trying to make is this: they don't have total control over this thing. You kind of have to release it to the world, so to speak, and once you do it reversing the damage done could be imposible if it doesn't exactly what you wanted. If that is the case, they would try to use it to do something stupid and not very important at all, like creating from nothing an obscure figure of 80s british entertainment, and present it to some openminded (to the point of schizophrenia) anons on the Internet, while winking. See if someone can see something. See if someone can archive something. Watch what happens in general. Maybe there's a way of pulling the plug if everything goes South. Maybe not: in that case, people would be scratching their heads, but not really concerned. The concerning shit comes later (if this is true, I must emphasize that).
I actually believe somethimg much more sinister, that I dare not say.
Spook!
Slither!
6/15/2025, 5:17:23 PM
>>40536224
>Which reminds me, that video and the Spookin Down The Street Live On Pebble Mill videos are the only videos with a visible microphone. This is the early/mid 80s we're talking here.
Thats an interesting point. Weren't there clip on mics back then (I don't know if that's how they're named)?
By the way I don't know if someone already linked this. Clearly a shitpost, but pretty funny.
https://youtu.be/6_bzkgXR_Sw?si=2eSbAImkiqG2xTe7
>Which reminds me, that video and the Spookin Down The Street Live On Pebble Mill videos are the only videos with a visible microphone. This is the early/mid 80s we're talking here.
Thats an interesting point. Weren't there clip on mics back then (I don't know if that's how they're named)?
By the way I don't know if someone already linked this. Clearly a shitpost, but pretty funny.
https://youtu.be/6_bzkgXR_Sw?si=2eSbAImkiqG2xTe7
Page 1