>>511213111

>>510292877

They’re “outside of time” from our perspective and we would appear to be moving verrry slowly to them so they’d have more time to spy on us or interfere with our events and timeline ……… we would be under dilation “from their perspective” and they would be under compression “from our perspective.”

On April 1, 2024 , we would have briefly been in the spatial time as their April 1, 2150, then from our perspective their time sort of runs backwards towards our April 1, 2020 , until April 1, 2025, after which their spatial time of April 1, 2046 would briefly be the same date and space time and then run backwards towards the spatial time of our April 1, 2021 on approximately April 1, 2026.

Because it’s 2150 in the part of their time space that doesn’t overlap with ours… running towards 2146…

It is only the part of theirs that overlaps with ours where 2022=2150 with a shared time space zone descending towards 2020; and then 2023=2046, with a shared time space zone descending towards 2021.

In the non shared geographic and/or spatial time of their reality and time space, it’s simply 2150 heading towards 2146. It is not compatible with 2020, 2021, etc.

And the window to interact with the “spatial time of” 1979 without leaving the spatial time you are IN right now is *gone* forever as of 3/27/2024.

Board is alow

>Florida cheers Gary
bro

Why is Coinbase a sponsor of Trump's Military Birthday Parade

>They will always call high sticking

>>507047349