It’s pretty straightforward, OP.
>Has exactly one personality trait
>Design doesn’t lend itself to much expression beyond that one personality trait
>Pretty much designed solely to be really popular with little kids
>Parent who end up having to watch it with said kids get annoyed with it
Barney was, ultimately, just another harmless kids mascot. But unlike other little kids programming like say, Sesame Street, there was very little that appealed to anyone outside that little kid demographic.
Everything that made Barney appealing to little kids was also exactly what made him obnoxious to the parents and older audiences that would inevitably get stuck watching it with said little kids.

>>530550750
>Banger of a theme song
>Horny as fuck for you
>Cucks your unlikable squad all at once
>Wants to reclaim the sky for everyone to enjoy again
>Prepared for almost anything with her on-hand supplies

>>63939162
based

>>149051466
If you need a giant wall of text to “prove” that a character is *insert scale here*, then your character PROBABLY isn’t. Just a hunch.
You can get away with it a little bit, but when your argument is about how this guy who has never even destroyed a mountain, much less a planet, can go around destroying *insert big number here* universes, then no. I’m not going to buy it. No matter how many walls of failed middle school math text you post to argue otherwise.