Search Results
7/13/2025, 6:12:03 AM
>>510235245
>Sol-Helios?
Let us face it, all of the major so called sun gods of the ancients were actually personifications of the Saturnian sun.
Even Ra, usually presented as the Egyptian sun god par excellence, turns out to have been imbued with characteristics and motions which are not, and can never be, attributable to the present Sun.
Thus Ra was lauded as having abided within a nest of rings or circles; of having been of an emerald color shedding rays of emerald hue; of "going up" on the west and "going down" on the east side of the sky; and of moving down at dawn and upstream at night.
So, likewise, with Yima who, as his alter ego Vaivasvata, or Vivasvant, was honored as a sun-god in the Zoroastrian tradition of ancient Persia.
But that the Persian Yima, the equivalent of the Hindu Yama, personified the planet Saturn is well known.
We could go down the list of various so called sun-gods only to find out that, originally, they were actually Saturnian sun-gods, prime among whom we also find the Greek Helios himself who, like Kronos, who was Saturn, was considered a Titan.
Helios and Yahweh were also identified with Dionysos, whose Satumian selfsameness need not be repeated.
Nor do we need these Titanic and Dionysiac connections in order to make our case because the Classical Greeks themselves were quite clear on the issue, presenting Helios as a name for the planet Saturn in no uncertain terms. And so, also, with the Latin Sol.
This leads us to assume that the jewish prayers to Helios, and the representations of Helios in jewish synagogues, were actually dedicated to Saturn.
while Saturn was not the only planet that was looked upon as a god, the Saturnian deity will be found at the very head of every pantheon the world has ever known.
He was the first and for a time the only god of humankind.
>Sol-Helios?
Let us face it, all of the major so called sun gods of the ancients were actually personifications of the Saturnian sun.
Even Ra, usually presented as the Egyptian sun god par excellence, turns out to have been imbued with characteristics and motions which are not, and can never be, attributable to the present Sun.
Thus Ra was lauded as having abided within a nest of rings or circles; of having been of an emerald color shedding rays of emerald hue; of "going up" on the west and "going down" on the east side of the sky; and of moving down at dawn and upstream at night.
So, likewise, with Yima who, as his alter ego Vaivasvata, or Vivasvant, was honored as a sun-god in the Zoroastrian tradition of ancient Persia.
But that the Persian Yima, the equivalent of the Hindu Yama, personified the planet Saturn is well known.
We could go down the list of various so called sun-gods only to find out that, originally, they were actually Saturnian sun-gods, prime among whom we also find the Greek Helios himself who, like Kronos, who was Saturn, was considered a Titan.
Helios and Yahweh were also identified with Dionysos, whose Satumian selfsameness need not be repeated.
Nor do we need these Titanic and Dionysiac connections in order to make our case because the Classical Greeks themselves were quite clear on the issue, presenting Helios as a name for the planet Saturn in no uncertain terms. And so, also, with the Latin Sol.
This leads us to assume that the jewish prayers to Helios, and the representations of Helios in jewish synagogues, were actually dedicated to Saturn.
while Saturn was not the only planet that was looked upon as a god, the Saturnian deity will be found at the very head of every pantheon the world has ever known.
He was the first and for a time the only god of humankind.
7/11/2025, 9:51:44 PM
>>510115445
some have seen the name "Satan" as having been derived from "Saturn."
Etymologically, this cannot be accepted since the name Satan is merely the English transcription of the Semitic "Shaitan". There are other indications, however that the entity known as Satan owes its origin to the planetary god in question.
The Gospel of Bartholomew names this "adversary of men" as Beliar (the same as Belial), which is merely a different rendering of Bel, whose identity as Saturn has been recognized by ancient as well as modern authorities.
The Gospel of Matthew, on the other hand, identifies him with Beelzebub (or Beelzebul), which should be more correctly rendered "Ba'al Zebub".
Later still, the early Christian Fathers continued to regard Ba'al Zephon as Satan. And yet Ba' al Zephon translates as Lord of the North, which is a very appropriate title for the Saturnian planetary god situated in Earth's north celestial pole.
the Israelite EL, a common form of the Near Eastern Saturnian deity, is often referred to as "Ba'al".
Even Yahweh, identified as a Saturnian deity, was equated with Ba'al.
The Prophet Hosea himself referred to Yahweh as the Ba'al of Israel.
It therefore becomes evident that Satanic and divine power were ambiguously regarded as having been one and the same.
This ambiguity continues to be evidenced by the Gypsy name for "God, " which is "devel".
This is traceable to early Indo European nomenclature.
Thus, as it ended up in Hinduism, the word deva stood for "God."
But according to Persian (or Iranian) tradition , deva stood for "fiend" or "devil."
a Kurdish tribe known as the Yezidis worship Shaitan as a god. To them , Shaitan represents the real force of divine power. All this has been brought out here in order to stress the disparity of the planetary god Saturn who continued to be remembered both as the Lord of Light and the Star of Evil.
some have seen the name "Satan" as having been derived from "Saturn."
Etymologically, this cannot be accepted since the name Satan is merely the English transcription of the Semitic "Shaitan". There are other indications, however that the entity known as Satan owes its origin to the planetary god in question.
The Gospel of Bartholomew names this "adversary of men" as Beliar (the same as Belial), which is merely a different rendering of Bel, whose identity as Saturn has been recognized by ancient as well as modern authorities.
The Gospel of Matthew, on the other hand, identifies him with Beelzebub (or Beelzebul), which should be more correctly rendered "Ba'al Zebub".
Later still, the early Christian Fathers continued to regard Ba'al Zephon as Satan. And yet Ba' al Zephon translates as Lord of the North, which is a very appropriate title for the Saturnian planetary god situated in Earth's north celestial pole.
the Israelite EL, a common form of the Near Eastern Saturnian deity, is often referred to as "Ba'al".
Even Yahweh, identified as a Saturnian deity, was equated with Ba'al.
The Prophet Hosea himself referred to Yahweh as the Ba'al of Israel.
It therefore becomes evident that Satanic and divine power were ambiguously regarded as having been one and the same.
This ambiguity continues to be evidenced by the Gypsy name for "God, " which is "devel".
This is traceable to early Indo European nomenclature.
Thus, as it ended up in Hinduism, the word deva stood for "God."
But according to Persian (or Iranian) tradition , deva stood for "fiend" or "devil."
a Kurdish tribe known as the Yezidis worship Shaitan as a god. To them , Shaitan represents the real force of divine power. All this has been brought out here in order to stress the disparity of the planetary god Saturn who continued to be remembered both as the Lord of Light and the Star of Evil.
7/6/2025, 7:50:48 PM
>>509671796
its actually a lot more simple than that:
>Christianity: Saturn worship
>Judaism: Saturn worship
>Islam: also Saturn worship
also
>Satan = Saturn
its actually a lot more simple than that:
>Christianity: Saturn worship
>Judaism: Saturn worship
>Islam: also Saturn worship
also
>Satan = Saturn
6/30/2025, 1:05:28 AM
>>509075774
people all over the world came up with religion and God(s) because of what they observed in the sky (Planets/Stars = Gods), and what they saw was different from what we see today.
for example they had a different sun, they experienced a time without the moon or any visible stars and without day and night cycle.
also the God of the old testament is "EL" and Cronos (or Kronos-the Greek name for the planet Saturn) is called "EL" by the Phoenicians. go figure.
also FYI jews, hindus and muslims are also saturn worshippers.
people all over the world came up with religion and God(s) because of what they observed in the sky (Planets/Stars = Gods), and what they saw was different from what we see today.
for example they had a different sun, they experienced a time without the moon or any visible stars and without day and night cycle.
also the God of the old testament is "EL" and Cronos (or Kronos-the Greek name for the planet Saturn) is called "EL" by the Phoenicians. go figure.
also FYI jews, hindus and muslims are also saturn worshippers.
6/30/2025, 1:05:28 AM
>>22879699
people all over the world came up with religion and God(s) because of what they observed in the sky (Planets/Stars = Gods), and what they saw was different from what we see today.
for example they had a different sun, they experienced a time without the moon or any visible stars and without day and night cycle.
also the God of the old testament is "EL" and Cronos (or Kronos-the Greek name for the planet Saturn) is called "EL" by the Phoenicians. go figure.
also FYI jews, hindus and muslims are also saturn worshippers.
people all over the world came up with religion and God(s) because of what they observed in the sky (Planets/Stars = Gods), and what they saw was different from what we see today.
for example they had a different sun, they experienced a time without the moon or any visible stars and without day and night cycle.
also the God of the old testament is "EL" and Cronos (or Kronos-the Greek name for the planet Saturn) is called "EL" by the Phoenicians. go figure.
also FYI jews, hindus and muslims are also saturn worshippers.
6/13/2025, 2:14:34 AM
>>507146820
As Brahmanyah, Saturn can therefore be said to be Brahma's planet.
In fact, while Indologists may find it difficult to accept, Brahma has long been identified as Saturn by certain sages of Hindu religion itself.
these sages consider Brahma to be the "true sun", which is the same as saying that, to them, it is Saturn, and not the present solar orb, that is the real "sun."
Since even these sages can see that this is absurdly not so, we can only assume, on the strength of what we have learned, that this dictum must have been believed to stem from ancient lore.
But how could Saturn have been to ancient man what the Sun is to us today?
As any work on Indian mythology will assert, Surya is not only the name of the god of the Sun but is the most common Sanskrit name of the Sun itself.
There are, however, lines of evidence which indicate that Surya, too, was originally Saturn, the least of which not being the reference to Surya as graha Surya, that is the planet Sun.
as in the case of the Egyptian Ra, Surya is described as having motions and characteristics which do not fit those of the Sun.
Thus, to give but one example, Surya is said to have occupied samanam dhama, which means "the same place of rising and setting."
Everyone knows that the Sun does not rise and set in the same place.
Let me, however, be a little more specific. Surya is also termed Suraj.
But Suraj, again, is yet another name for the planet Saturn.
So that, yet one more time, we can see that Saturn and the Sun once shared the same name as, among the Hindus, at least in Sanskrit, they still do.
another Sanskrit name for the planet Saturn is Grahanayakah, which means "chief, or leader, of the planets."
But, again, Grahanayakah is also one of the names bestowed on the Sun.
As Brahmanyah, Saturn can therefore be said to be Brahma's planet.
In fact, while Indologists may find it difficult to accept, Brahma has long been identified as Saturn by certain sages of Hindu religion itself.
these sages consider Brahma to be the "true sun", which is the same as saying that, to them, it is Saturn, and not the present solar orb, that is the real "sun."
Since even these sages can see that this is absurdly not so, we can only assume, on the strength of what we have learned, that this dictum must have been believed to stem from ancient lore.
But how could Saturn have been to ancient man what the Sun is to us today?
As any work on Indian mythology will assert, Surya is not only the name of the god of the Sun but is the most common Sanskrit name of the Sun itself.
There are, however, lines of evidence which indicate that Surya, too, was originally Saturn, the least of which not being the reference to Surya as graha Surya, that is the planet Sun.
as in the case of the Egyptian Ra, Surya is described as having motions and characteristics which do not fit those of the Sun.
Thus, to give but one example, Surya is said to have occupied samanam dhama, which means "the same place of rising and setting."
Everyone knows that the Sun does not rise and set in the same place.
Let me, however, be a little more specific. Surya is also termed Suraj.
But Suraj, again, is yet another name for the planet Saturn.
So that, yet one more time, we can see that Saturn and the Sun once shared the same name as, among the Hindus, at least in Sanskrit, they still do.
another Sanskrit name for the planet Saturn is Grahanayakah, which means "chief, or leader, of the planets."
But, again, Grahanayakah is also one of the names bestowed on the Sun.
Page 1