>>716306362
>>716306697
Many such cases.

>>24573079
Because incels are statistically a very recent phenomenon. Say a a century ago 95% of men got married (not laid, married) by middle age and the rare that didn't were voluntarily avoiding it (based autists or they may have been whoremongers which was a non issue then). Incelism in 1925 was restricted to those disfigured WWI veterans. In the early modern era even hunchbacks were married.

Zoomers killed marriages.

How are women going to survive now that the "marry a betabuxx in your 30s" strategy has been nerfed by the devs?