Search Results
7/1/2025, 2:06:50 PM
>>714159170
Tomb Raider (1996)
Grand Theft Auto III (2001)
Max Payne (2001)
Resident Evil 4 (2005)
Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune (2007)
Dead Space (2008)
Tomb Raider (1996)
Grand Theft Auto III (2001)
Max Payne (2001)
Resident Evil 4 (2005)
Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune (2007)
Dead Space (2008)
6/28/2025, 1:11:40 AM
>>713836487
>>713836848
OP like always is a faggot.
Villains are still allowed to be evil, but what people actually want is villains with depth — not just one-dimensional “evil for evil’s sake.” Look at Spider-Man villains: they’re rarely just “evil,” they’re usually twisted, broken, or insane — like the Green Goblin, who’s more tragic and unhinged than some generic bad guy.
Same with Batman — his villains are iconic because they’re psychologically complex. Take Two-Face, a guy torn apart by trauma and obsession, not just a mustache-twirling villain. Joker is chaos incarnate, but even he’s got layers beyond just “evil.”
Look at The Sopranos — Tony Soprano’s a mob boss who commits horrible acts but you still get why he’s the way he is. The Wire doesn’t give you simple “bad guys”; it shows a system that corrupts everyone, making villains sympathetic and real. And Breaking Bad? Walter White is textbook — villainy mixed with desperation, pride, and flawed humanity.
Even old school games like Silent Hill or Resident Evil didn’t just throw out pure evil; they wrapped darkness in tragedy, madness, or survival horror.
So no, villains aren’t “not allowed” to be evil anymore — it’s just that “pure evil” is boring. We want villains who feel real, who make us think and sometimes even root for them in their brokenness.
>>713836848
OP like always is a faggot.
Villains are still allowed to be evil, but what people actually want is villains with depth — not just one-dimensional “evil for evil’s sake.” Look at Spider-Man villains: they’re rarely just “evil,” they’re usually twisted, broken, or insane — like the Green Goblin, who’s more tragic and unhinged than some generic bad guy.
Same with Batman — his villains are iconic because they’re psychologically complex. Take Two-Face, a guy torn apart by trauma and obsession, not just a mustache-twirling villain. Joker is chaos incarnate, but even he’s got layers beyond just “evil.”
Look at The Sopranos — Tony Soprano’s a mob boss who commits horrible acts but you still get why he’s the way he is. The Wire doesn’t give you simple “bad guys”; it shows a system that corrupts everyone, making villains sympathetic and real. And Breaking Bad? Walter White is textbook — villainy mixed with desperation, pride, and flawed humanity.
Even old school games like Silent Hill or Resident Evil didn’t just throw out pure evil; they wrapped darkness in tragedy, madness, or survival horror.
So no, villains aren’t “not allowed” to be evil anymore — it’s just that “pure evil” is boring. We want villains who feel real, who make us think and sometimes even root for them in their brokenness.
6/27/2025, 3:04:43 PM
>>212037127
Zillennial here. Salem rules, stfu op
Zillennial here. Salem rules, stfu op
6/21/2025, 2:31:25 PM
>>713236881
>>713236881
I have never had gay romance in any RPG I ever played. Neither Dragons Age nor Baldur's Gate nor Mass Effect nor Elder Scrolls nor Kingdom Come
>>713236881
I have never had gay romance in any RPG I ever played. Neither Dragons Age nor Baldur's Gate nor Mass Effect nor Elder Scrolls nor Kingdom Come
6/21/2025, 11:14:51 AM
>>508168657
OP, the faggot, stole the video from reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/1lg01jm/man_tries_hottest_curry_in_london_and_almost/
OP, the faggot, stole the video from reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/1lg01jm/man_tries_hottest_curry_in_london_and_almost/
6/19/2025, 3:24:55 PM
>>507974179
Only a very few statues were destroyed. During the early medieval period, the dominant architectural style was Romanesque, which was based on Greco-Roman traditions, with rounded arches, thick walls, and strong pillars. Christians also preserved the names of the planets and the days of the week, continuing Roman influence. There was also a kind of small renaissance during this time, especially in places like the Carolingian Empire, where scholars studied ancient texts, including the works of Plato and other Greek philosophers. This helped keep classical knowledge alive until the larger Renaissance came later.
Only a very few statues were destroyed. During the early medieval period, the dominant architectural style was Romanesque, which was based on Greco-Roman traditions, with rounded arches, thick walls, and strong pillars. Christians also preserved the names of the planets and the days of the week, continuing Roman influence. There was also a kind of small renaissance during this time, especially in places like the Carolingian Empire, where scholars studied ancient texts, including the works of Plato and other Greek philosophers. This helped keep classical knowledge alive until the larger Renaissance came later.
6/19/2025, 1:52:16 AM
>>211656706
Retard, do you have any proof? Another maggot op made thread on false premise
Retard, do you have any proof? Another maggot op made thread on false premise
6/17/2025, 12:07:21 AM
6/16/2025, 12:18:23 AM
Page 1