>>716206032
>Is freedom of choice in RPG games an unrealistic expectation?
If you mean by that a sandbox experience like gta or red dead redemption then no, it's possible to make that and is not necessarily costly.
if instead you mean multiple endings and paths to a game then it's also possible but very costly, like with detroit becoming human.
in either case i find such design boring and unfun, the dev basically leaves you to make your own fun and do whatever you want, I prefer more focused games where the experience is catered, there can be choices but they have to serve a purpose within the game's story or for it's gameplay

>>33351321
women as a whole aren't worth it desu, sure get married if you can find a normal sane woman(lol) but never expect it to be this amazing experience that will elevate your life. ironically enough in my experience the people who were less invested in women&marriage had more success with women and marriage, i think it has something with them not having anything to lose but idk

>>713257746
>just monetize your opinions via eceleb-slop,
i actually opened up to 2 buddies of mine about making a review channel and both cut me off on 2 seprate occasions because they didn't care. it feels like too much effort for no guaranteed return(this makes me less motivated) and the bigger problem is i wouldn't know where to start. ultimately i might end up doing it if only to have a place to vent out my thoughts and share my feelings about shitty games, you almost never get a chance to go into detail about why a game is bad while explaining it to someone.
>even if people hate it you still get money.
how many views would you need to get money anyways? i can't imagine myself going past 100K at the absolute best.

>>49583464
I miss the little reunions we used to have it's not the same