Search Results
7/25/2025, 11:15:46 AM
7/2/2025, 12:27:38 AM
>>509254935
Not necessarily the case. The war of the flea was written about using the states power and size against itself, with historical examples. A state with problems such as Serbia can be exploited over and over again. The problems of the few can be made the problems of everyone, the state can be forced to eat the blame. If real fighting breaks out the rebels can be made to look ever the sympathetic david to the evil goliath, they can get support from abroad, make concessions with Croatia and Bosnia that a new regime if established will never try to take clay from their neighbors and give some back. The government can be made to chase ghosts and in their rage attack the blameless. A corrupt state hit in the coffers will hemorrhage support, rebels do it for love or hate before money; professional soldiers will in part walk if the pay runs out. Corporate interests will support continued profits before any other motive. The IRA didn't win until they attacked financial centers. The government is responsible for maintaining services so they can be caught making repairs. The government can be filmed beating, torturing and imprisoning citizens. If there is a small contingent willing to go all the way an underdog can do much. In America red team war games found a 2-3% population uprising could be nation ending. Most people are lemmings and as soon as you learn that you can guide them to your side or make them otherwise impassive to changes. Its much easier to win an uphill battle against superior forces if you are truly in the moral right, though it can be used to excuse any number of evil things. The situation is favorable to insurgency. There are social and economic problems, unrest is aimed at commoners and there is a sympathetic population that would aid more dedicated opposition. The US leftist insurgents of the 70s lacked all of these things and so despite the will they lost, being imprisoned or killed.
Not necessarily the case. The war of the flea was written about using the states power and size against itself, with historical examples. A state with problems such as Serbia can be exploited over and over again. The problems of the few can be made the problems of everyone, the state can be forced to eat the blame. If real fighting breaks out the rebels can be made to look ever the sympathetic david to the evil goliath, they can get support from abroad, make concessions with Croatia and Bosnia that a new regime if established will never try to take clay from their neighbors and give some back. The government can be made to chase ghosts and in their rage attack the blameless. A corrupt state hit in the coffers will hemorrhage support, rebels do it for love or hate before money; professional soldiers will in part walk if the pay runs out. Corporate interests will support continued profits before any other motive. The IRA didn't win until they attacked financial centers. The government is responsible for maintaining services so they can be caught making repairs. The government can be filmed beating, torturing and imprisoning citizens. If there is a small contingent willing to go all the way an underdog can do much. In America red team war games found a 2-3% population uprising could be nation ending. Most people are lemmings and as soon as you learn that you can guide them to your side or make them otherwise impassive to changes. Its much easier to win an uphill battle against superior forces if you are truly in the moral right, though it can be used to excuse any number of evil things. The situation is favorable to insurgency. There are social and economic problems, unrest is aimed at commoners and there is a sympathetic population that would aid more dedicated opposition. The US leftist insurgents of the 70s lacked all of these things and so despite the will they lost, being imprisoned or killed.
6/29/2025, 12:07:21 PM
6/20/2025, 1:43:55 AM
Page 1