>>24577807
>They will read only what is safe to read, what has been approved as a classic, or serious literature.
im like this except the opposite. "safe" or "classic" reads to me like something that has already been mimicked a thousand times in other things i've read. i only read that which i can never find any person in real life to share a conversation with about, as i am the only person that i know that has read the work in question. reading is for nerds. i may be a nerd, but i don't want to talk to other nerds. i will take quotes i read in esoteric works and use them out of context to elevate whatever i have to say to people who would otherwise not care at all what the words i am saying mean, many times never attributing the quote to the original author or even implying that the quote came from someone other than myself.

>when you just emptied your entire load inside your dead younger brothers girl and she says she isn't on birth control

>>715490924
Most of these aren't contrarian opinions, they're just idiotic