Search Results
6/28/2025, 3:28:06 AM
6/26/2025, 3:13:11 AM
>>211987798
>Bro
>*hits nitrous*
>What if we like
>*hits nitrous*
>Told everyone we were in trouble with the law
>*hits blunt*
>And then took the steam down for two days while at peak viewer interest
>*does line off mints big cheeks*
>And start over in a new house
>Bro
>*hits nitrous*
>What if we like
>*hits nitrous*
>Told everyone we were in trouble with the law
>*hits blunt*
>And then took the steam down for two days while at peak viewer interest
>*does line off mints big cheeks*
>And start over in a new house
6/17/2025, 6:47:45 PM
The Streisand effect is when an attempt to censor or hide information inadvertently leads to a wider spread and increased awareness of that information. It's a phenomenon where efforts to suppress something often have the opposite effect, drawing more attention to it.
The term originated from a 2003 incident where Barbra Streisand sued to remove aerial photographs of her Malibu mansion from a public website, claiming privacy concerns. While the lawsuit was ultimately dismissed, the publicity surrounding the attempt to suppress the images generated significant media coverage and resulted in a massive increase in views of the photos.
Essentially, the Streisand effect highlights the unintended consequences of censorship and the power of the internet to amplify information, even when attempts are made to contain it.
The term originated from a 2003 incident where Barbra Streisand sued to remove aerial photographs of her Malibu mansion from a public website, claiming privacy concerns. While the lawsuit was ultimately dismissed, the publicity surrounding the attempt to suppress the images generated significant media coverage and resulted in a massive increase in views of the photos.
Essentially, the Streisand effect highlights the unintended consequences of censorship and the power of the internet to amplify information, even when attempts are made to contain it.
6/17/2025, 4:53:00 AM
6/16/2025, 12:01:27 PM
Page 1