Search Results
7/6/2025, 6:05:38 PM
>>509664559
I can tell you're a woman and I think your points are fake.
Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and prove it by going on a picnic sharing a home baked Dutch apple pie and cuddling afterwards if you are White
I can tell you're a woman and I think your points are fake.
Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and prove it by going on a picnic sharing a home baked Dutch apple pie and cuddling afterwards if you are White
7/4/2025, 11:43:40 PM
>>509521168
Without even focusing on the discussion of inherent benefits of purity you have some major holes.
Firstly anyone with an inkling of intelligence knows and understands that past behavior is the greatest predictor for future behavior.
So if a woman has had a history of sleeping around and having lots of relationships, the indicators for her behavior for a long-term monogamous relationship is long.
Second is an extremely large topic that is society existentially apocalyptic.
Families effectively don't hardly exist anymore.
With women's suffrage and no fault divorce there is absolutely zero guarantee of a family actually surviving.
People and explicitly women aren't interested in being husbands and wives anymore, just long-term girlfriends and boyfriends that they can end with a court meeting.
So to summarize what you are effectively doing is advocating for example that will most likely result in a broken family we're the man will have state enforced lesser control over his offspring.
Children from this dysfunctional broken family statistically also will be less functional adults and more likely to fall into this behavior.
Also any concept that women choose for eugenic properties in their mates and that the offspring from this female choice is better for it is completely divorced from reality.
That kind of insinuation in and of itself implies a certain level of complete disingenuousness and misanthropy.
To summarize logically people should have families and reproduce, explicitly White people.
Past behavior is important, because it illuminates future behavior.
But families cannot coexist with no fault divorce and women's suffrage, only broken families and dysfunctional offspring.
Without even focusing on the discussion of inherent benefits of purity you have some major holes.
Firstly anyone with an inkling of intelligence knows and understands that past behavior is the greatest predictor for future behavior.
So if a woman has had a history of sleeping around and having lots of relationships, the indicators for her behavior for a long-term monogamous relationship is long.
Second is an extremely large topic that is society existentially apocalyptic.
Families effectively don't hardly exist anymore.
With women's suffrage and no fault divorce there is absolutely zero guarantee of a family actually surviving.
People and explicitly women aren't interested in being husbands and wives anymore, just long-term girlfriends and boyfriends that they can end with a court meeting.
So to summarize what you are effectively doing is advocating for example that will most likely result in a broken family we're the man will have state enforced lesser control over his offspring.
Children from this dysfunctional broken family statistically also will be less functional adults and more likely to fall into this behavior.
Also any concept that women choose for eugenic properties in their mates and that the offspring from this female choice is better for it is completely divorced from reality.
That kind of insinuation in and of itself implies a certain level of complete disingenuousness and misanthropy.
To summarize logically people should have families and reproduce, explicitly White people.
Past behavior is important, because it illuminates future behavior.
But families cannot coexist with no fault divorce and women's suffrage, only broken families and dysfunctional offspring.
7/3/2025, 12:39:25 AM
>>509346063
No there's no women here otherwise they could easily prove it by going on a picnic sharing a home baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe and cuddling with me if they were moderately attractive and White
No there's no women here otherwise they could easily prove it by going on a picnic sharing a home baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe and cuddling with me if they were moderately attractive and White
6/26/2025, 9:08:51 AM
6/25/2025, 8:23:28 PM
>>508689322
You know what I don't believe you're a woman.
You should prove it by going on a picnic enjoying a home-baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe and cuddling with me if you are moderately attractive and White
You know what I don't believe you're a woman.
You should prove it by going on a picnic enjoying a home-baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe and cuddling with me if you are moderately attractive and White
ID: Ko10Jzu7/pol/507653507#507663404
6/17/2025, 2:34:43 AM
ID: kPQg27JB/soc/34014400#34028514
6/9/2025, 9:01:22 PM
>>34014400
I have a very sickening and perverse fantasy of going on a picnic sharing some wine and sandwiches prepared beforehand. Also a home baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe.
Then enjoying food drink good company followed by the worst of all, cuddling and snuggling with a moderately attractive White woman.
I guarantee you my fantasy is more outlandish and unlikely to be entertained than any of yours
I have a very sickening and perverse fantasy of going on a picnic sharing some wine and sandwiches prepared beforehand. Also a home baked Dutch apple pie from a three generation old recipe.
Then enjoying food drink good company followed by the worst of all, cuddling and snuggling with a moderately attractive White woman.
I guarantee you my fantasy is more outlandish and unlikely to be entertained than any of yours
Page 1