Search Results
7/15/2025, 9:47:49 PM
>>105914266
>I take it this applies only to the Intel CPUs with the performance and efficiency core setup, so Ryzen is completely unaffected?
Some of the Ryzen models are also heterogeneous, with an asymmetrical CCD layout, e.g. 7950X3D. Not all heterogeneous architectures are created equal, of course.
With that example model's case, it appears to be supported in W10 22H2, according to MSFT documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-10-22h2-supported-amd-processors
>but with the whole complaining on the web about stuff not being scheduled right, YMMV
Either way: make sure your CPU is on the list, and you should (probably) be fine.
>>105914513
>Explorer
>taking 12GB of RAM
>memory leaks
Any third-party program hooked to your explorer.exe process that you have installed, like a shell extension or some Windhawk tweak? Explorer by itself shouldn't swallow that much memory.
>I take it this applies only to the Intel CPUs with the performance and efficiency core setup, so Ryzen is completely unaffected?
Some of the Ryzen models are also heterogeneous, with an asymmetrical CCD layout, e.g. 7950X3D. Not all heterogeneous architectures are created equal, of course.
With that example model's case, it appears to be supported in W10 22H2, according to MSFT documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/minimum/supported/windows-10-22h2-supported-amd-processors
>but with the whole complaining on the web about stuff not being scheduled right, YMMV
Either way: make sure your CPU is on the list, and you should (probably) be fine.
>>105914513
>Explorer
>taking 12GB of RAM
>memory leaks
Any third-party program hooked to your explorer.exe process that you have installed, like a shell extension or some Windhawk tweak? Explorer by itself shouldn't swallow that much memory.
7/13/2025, 7:28:22 PM
>>531080261
>This card is bad because... I can't read. But I will be extremely confident and adamant about my opinion
>This card is bad because... I can't read. But I will be extremely confident and adamant about my opinion
7/2/2025, 4:48:25 PM
6/22/2025, 12:52:47 AM
6/20/2025, 3:51:24 PM
>>105651375
this, often send the same prompt to deepseek and chatgpt and deepseek is just way better
this, often send the same prompt to deepseek and chatgpt and deepseek is just way better
Page 1