Search Results
7/25/2025, 7:30:39 PM
7/23/2025, 6:36:34 PM
7/22/2025, 1:38:29 PM
>>937437104
You are completely incorrect/retarded/deranged, but I must say I almost admire your sheer persistence. It takes a special kind of mind to have such an extended and focused mental health episode. This is the first and last time I dignify your dumb ass with a response.
You are completely incorrect/retarded/deranged, but I must say I almost admire your sheer persistence. It takes a special kind of mind to have such an extended and focused mental health episode. This is the first and last time I dignify your dumb ass with a response.
7/21/2025, 7:18:21 PM
7/20/2025, 2:10:12 PM
>>937351589
Did you like them?
Did you like them?
7/19/2025, 10:36:31 PM
>>937324116
I would (will, it's inevitable) undoubtedly be upset but I don't think it will induce a full on meltdown.
>>937324131
My throat is hetero bro
>>937324141
>>937324279
I recall neither a goonathon nor a crashout but I suppose it's possible that such events happened
>>937324305
same
I would (will, it's inevitable) undoubtedly be upset but I don't think it will induce a full on meltdown.
>>937324131
My throat is hetero bro
>>937324141
>>937324279
I recall neither a goonathon nor a crashout but I suppose it's possible that such events happened
>>937324305
same
7/19/2025, 12:19:05 AM
7/17/2025, 9:15:06 PM
>>937233407
Hi, I've used your post to perform a quick bit of psychoanalysis and I have determined that despite your claim that everyone here are faggots, you are still at some level. Otherwise you would keep the webms to yourself entirely, not even mentioning their existence. Instead you intend to provoke a response. Thank you for reading.
Hi, I've used your post to perform a quick bit of psychoanalysis and I have determined that despite your claim that everyone here are faggots, you are still at some level. Otherwise you would keep the webms to yourself entirely, not even mentioning their existence. Instead you intend to provoke a response. Thank you for reading.
7/17/2025, 3:35:17 PM
I want to talk about the two contrasting forms of reason; that of Plato, which he shares with the gods, and that of Ulysses, which he shares with the foxes. For there is reason as a practical function of an individual consciousness, and there is reason abstracted from any form of particularity. I'm more interested in the latter, but both kinds of reason are interdependent. Ulysses provides the scaffolding upon which platonic reason is built. You think the guys in the cel thread would be interested???
7/14/2025, 1:18:24 PM
7/12/2025, 11:57:14 PM
7/7/2025, 2:23:17 PM
>>936761279
You aren't supposed to take it at face value retard, it's the memoir of an unreliable narrator trying to justify his crimes. My take is that it's a horrifying story that is beautifully written. It begs the question, "can the art be separated from the artist?" The artist in this case being the fictional Humbert Humbert, not Nabokov himself. Humbert is a monster, but his writing is incredible.
You aren't supposed to take it at face value retard, it's the memoir of an unreliable narrator trying to justify his crimes. My take is that it's a horrifying story that is beautifully written. It begs the question, "can the art be separated from the artist?" The artist in this case being the fictional Humbert Humbert, not Nabokov himself. Humbert is a monster, but his writing is incredible.
7/4/2025, 9:23:34 PM
6/28/2025, 1:11:32 AM
6/21/2025, 6:47:18 PM
6/20/2025, 9:04:17 PM
6/18/2025, 6:48:22 PM
6/17/2025, 10:47:28 PM
>>935907153
>>935907206
I got lost in the sauce of my own bit, and have been neglecting the creation of new images and webms. I hereby pledge to do better.
>>935907206
I got lost in the sauce of my own bit, and have been neglecting the creation of new images and webms. I hereby pledge to do better.
6/17/2025, 1:01:52 AM
>>935872974
It's highly inferior for literary discourse
It's highly inferior for literary discourse
6/12/2025, 1:10:26 PM
>>935670534
Not only does unconditional happiness not exist, but it's not even desirable. Differentiation is a necessity of experience. Uniform unchanging oneness is, in fact, identical to nothingness because it's impossible for an observer to draw any distinctions whatsoever. Total unconditional happiness would ultimately be total vacuousness.
Or maybe I'm just self deluding and this is like Aesop's fable of the fox and the grapes. Good talk.
Not only does unconditional happiness not exist, but it's not even desirable. Differentiation is a necessity of experience. Uniform unchanging oneness is, in fact, identical to nothingness because it's impossible for an observer to draw any distinctions whatsoever. Total unconditional happiness would ultimately be total vacuousness.
Or maybe I'm just self deluding and this is like Aesop's fable of the fox and the grapes. Good talk.
Page 1